Gender differences in community integration after spinal cord injury

Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 163-174

  Forchheimer, Martin B ^a   Kalpakjian, Claire Z ^a   Tate, Denise G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Barriers; CHART; CHIEF; Community integration; Gender; ICF; Societal participation; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRAIG HANDICAP ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING TECHNIQUE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIALIZATION; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

EID: 11144238950     PISSN: 10820744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/KG8C-TJCP-95A5-N949     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P. Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(4):170-180.
2. Hansen N, Forchheimer M, Tate D, Luera G. Relationships among community reintegration, coping strategies and life satisfaction in a sample of persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 1998;4(1):56-72.
3. Richards J, Bombardier C, Tate D, et al. Access to the environment and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1501-1506.
4. Krause JS. Activity patterns after spinal cord injury: relationship to gender and race. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 1998;4(1):31-41.
5. Krause JS. Dimensions of subjective well-being after spinal cord injury: an empirical analysis by gender and race/ethnicity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:900-909.
6. Vandenakker CB, Glass DD. Menopause and aging with disability. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2001;12(1):133-151.
7. Greenwald BD, Seel RT, Cifu DX, Shah AN. Gender-related differences in acute rehabilitation lengths of stay, charges, and functional outcomes for a matched sample with spinal cord injury: a multicenter investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(9):1181-1187.
8. Shackelford M, Parley T, Vines CL. A comparison of women and men with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1998;36(5):337-339.
9. Budh CN, Lund I, Hultling C, et al. Gender related differences in pain in spinal cord injured individuals. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(2): 122-128.
10. Levi R, Hultling C, Seiger A. The Stockholm Spinal Cord Injury Study. 2. Associations between clinical patient characteristics and post-acute medical problems. Paraplegia. 1995;33(10):585-594.
11. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
12. Whiteneck G, Tate D, Charlifue S. Predicting community reintegration after spinal cord injury from demographic and injury characteristics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(11): 1485-1491.
13. Walker N, Mellick D, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. Measuring participation across impairment groups using the Craig handicap assessment reporting technique. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(12):936-941.
14. American Spinal Injury Association. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, 6th ed. Chicago, IL: Author; 2000.
15. Granger C, Hamilton B. The Functional Independence Measure. In: McDowell I, Newell C, eds. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires, 2nded. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987:115-121.
16. Hall K, Cohen M, Wright J, Call M, Werner P. Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(11):1471-1476.
17. Ottenbacher K, Hsu Y, Granger C, Fiedler R. The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1226-1232.
18. Kreuter M. Spinal cord injury and partner relationships. Spinal Cord. 2000;38:2-6.
19. Holicky R, Charlifue S. Ageing with spinal cord injury: the impact of spousal support. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:250-257.
20. Whiteneck G, Charilifue C, Gerhart K, Overholser J, Richardson N. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519-526.
21. Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors, Manual Version 3.0; 2001.
22. Cusick CP, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. The use of proxies in community integration research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82(8):1018-1024.
23. Zhang L, Abreu B, Gonzales V, Seale G, Masel B, Ottenbacher K. Comparison of the Community Integration Questionnaire, the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique, and the Disability Rating Scale in traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17(6):497-509.
24. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.