Hierarchy and monophyly

Cladistics

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 498-500

  Skinner, Adam ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b SOUTH AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144229826     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00036.x     Document Type: Letter

References (22)

1. Eldredge, N., Salthe, S.N., 1984. Hierarchy and evolution. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 1, 184-208.
2. Frost, D.R., Kluge, A.G., 1994. A consideration of epistemology in systematic biology, with special reference to species. Cladistics, 10, 259-294.
3. Ghiselin, M., 1997. Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. State University of New York Press, Albany.
4. Grene, M., 1969. Hierarchy: one word, how many concepts? In: Whyte, L.L., Wilson, A.G., Wilson, D. (Eds.), Hierarchical Structures. Elsevier, New York, pp. 56-58.
5. Lidén, M., 1990. Replicators, hierarchy, and the species problem. Cladistics, 6, 183-186.
6. Mayr, E., 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Mishler, B.D., Brandon, R.N., 1987. Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept. Biol. Philos. 2, 397-414.
8. Nixon, K.C., Wheeler, Q.D., 1990. An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics, 6, 211-223.
9. Pleijel, F., 1999. Phylogenetic taxonomy, a farewell to species, and a revision of Heteropodarke (Hesionidae, Polychaeta, Annelida). Syst. Biol. 48, 755-789.
10. Pleijel, F., Rouse, G.W., 2000a. Least-inclusive taxonomic unit: a new taxonomic concept for biology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 267, 627-630.
11. Pleijel, F., Rouse, G.W., 2000b. A new taxon, capricornia (Hesionidae, Polychaeta), illustrating the LITU ('least-inclusive taxonomic unit') concept. Zool. Scr. 29, 157-168.
12. Pleijel, F., Rouse, G.W., 2003. Ceci n'est pas une pipe: names, clades and phylogenetic nomenclature. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 41, 162-174.
13. de Queiroz, K., Donoghue, M.J., 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics, 4, 317-338.
14. de Queiroz, K., Donoghue, M.J., 1990. Phylogenetic systematics or Nelson's version of cladistics? Cladistics, 6, 61-75.
15. Rieppel, O., 1994. Species and history. In: Scotland, R.W., Siebert, D.J., Williams, D.M. (Eds.), Models in Phylogeny Reconstruction. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 31-50.
16. Rosen, D.E., 1979. Fishes from the uplands and intermontane basins of Guatemala: revisionary studies and comparative geography. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 162, 267-376.
17. Salthe, S.N., 1985. Evolving Hierarchical Systems. Columbia University Press, New York.
18. Simpson, G.G., 1955. The Major Features of Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.
19. Talbot, S.L., Shields, G.F., 1996. Phylogeography of brown bears (Ursus arctos) of Alaska and paraphyly within the Ursidae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5, 477-494.
20. Vrba, E.S., Eldredge, N., 1984. Individuals, hierarchies and processes: towards a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology, 10, 146-171.
21. Wiley, E.O., Mayden, R.L., 2000. The evolutionary species concept. In: Wheeler, Q.D., Meier, R. (Eds.), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: a Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 70-89.
22. Wimsatt, W.C., 1994. The ontology of complex systems: levels of organization, perspectives, and causal thickets. Can. J. Philos. 20(Suppl.), 207-274.