Phylogenetic taxonomy, a farewell to species, and a revision of Heteropodarke (Hesionidae, Polychaeta, Annelida)

Systematic Biology

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 755-789

  Pleijel, Fredrik ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Apomorphy based definitions; Linnean nomenclature; Phylogenetic taxonomy; Polychaetes; Ranks; Species concepts; Species names; Types

Indexed keywords

ANNELIDA; HESIONIDAE; HETEROMORPHA; HETEROPODARKE; POLYCHAETA;

EID: 0033270466     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351599260003     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. ALTANGEREL, P., M. A. NORELL, L. M. CHIAPPE, AND J. M. CLARK. 1993. Flightless bird from Cretaceous of Mongolia. Nature 362:623-626.
2. AMOUREUX, L. 1983. Annélides polychètes du golfe d'Aqaba (mer Rouge). Description d'un genre nouveau et de deux espèces nouvelles. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris Ser. 4,5:723-742.
3. BAUM, D. A., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. Choosing among alternative "phylogenetic" species concepts. Syst. Biol. 20:560-573.
4. BENTON, M. J., AND J. M. CLARK. 1988. Archosaur phylogeny and the relationships of the Crocodylia. Pages 295-338 in The phylogeny and classification of tetrapods, volume 1. Amphibians, reptiles, birds (M. J. Benton, ed.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
5. BLAKE, J. A. 1975. The larval development of polychaeta from the northern California coast. Eighteen species of Errantia. Ophelia 14:23-84.
6. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42:795-803.
7. BREMER, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295-304.
8. BREMER, K., AND H.-E. WANNTORP. 1979. Geographic populations or biological species in phylogeny reconstruction? Syst. Biol. 28:220-224.
9. BRUNDIN, L. 1966. Transarctic relationships and their significance, as evidenced by chironomid midges, with a monograph of the subfamilies Podonominae and Aphroteniinae and the austral Heptagyiae. K. Sven. Vetenskapsakad. Handl. 11:1-472.
10. BRYANT, H. N. 1994. Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the naming of crown clades. Syst. Biol. 43: 124-130.
11. BRYANT, H. N. 1996. Explicitness, stability, and universality in the phylogenetic definition and usage of taxon names: A case study of the phylogenetic taxonomy of the Carnivora (Mammalia). Syst. Biol. 45:174-189.
12. CAIN, A. J. 1959. Taxonomic concepts. Ibis 101:302-318.
13. CANNATELLA, D. C., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1993. Amphibian relationships: Phylogenetic analysis of morphology and molecules. Herpetol. Monogr. 7:1-7.
14. CANTINO, P. D., R. G. OLMSTEAD, AND S. J. WAGSTAFF. 1997. A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: A botanical case study. Syst. Biol. 46:313-331.
15. CLARIDGE, M. F., DAWAH, H. A., AND M. R. WILSON. 1997. Species: The units of biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, London.
16. CRACRAFT, J. 1983. Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr. Ornithol. 1:159-187.
17. CRANE, P. R., AND P. KENRICK. 1997. Problems in cladistic classification: Higher-level relationships in land plants. Aliso 15:87-104.
18. DARWIN, C. 1859. On the origin of species. John Murray, London.
19. DE PINNA, M. C. C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7:367-394.
20. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1987. Phylogenetic systematics of iguanine lizards. A comparative osteological study. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 118:1-203.
21. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1988. Systematics and the Darwinian revolution. Phil. Sci. 55:238-259.
22. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1992. Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy. Biol. Philos. 7:295-313.
23. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1994. Replacement of an essentialistic perspective on taxonomic definitions as exemplified by the definition of "Mammalia." Syst. Biol. 43: 497-510.
24. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1995. The definitions of species and clade names: A reply to Ghiselin. Biol. Philos. 10: 223-228.
25. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1996. A phylogenetic approach to biological nomenclature as an alternative to the Linnaean system in current use. In Proceedings of a minisymposium on biological nomenclature in the 21st century (J. L. Reveal, ed.). Univ. Maryland, College Park. Available via http://www.inform.umd. edu/PBIO/nomcl/dequ.html.
26. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1997. Misunderstandings about the phylogenetic approach to biological nomenclature: A reply to Lidèn and Oxelman. Zool. Scr. 26:67-70.
27. DE QUEIROZ, K., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4:317-338.
28. DE QUEIROZ, K., AND J. GAUTHIER. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: Phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39:307-322.
29. DE QUEIROZ, K., AND J. GAUTHIER. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:449-480.
30. DE QUEIROZ, K., AND J. GAUTHIER. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:27-31.
31. DING, Z., AND W. WESTHEIDE. 1994. Two new interstitial Streptosyllis species from South China (Polychaeta: Syllidae). Microfauna Mar. 9:303-312.
32. DING, Z., B. WU, AND W. WESTHEIDE. 1997. A new interstitial species of Heteropodarke (Polychaeta: Hesionidae) from Xiamen, China. Raffles Bull. Zool. 45:319-325.
33. DOMINGUEZ, E., AND Q. D. WHEELER. 1997. Taxonomic stability is ignorance. Cladistics 13:367-372.
34. DONOGHUE, M. J. 1985. A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Bryologist 88:172-181.
35. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79:333-345.
36. DORSEY, J. H. 1978. A first report of Heteropodarke heteromorpha Hartmann-Schröder, 1962 (Polychaeta: Hesionidae) from California. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 77:82-84.
37. DOYLE, J. A., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1993. Phylogenies and angiosperm diversification. Paleobiology 19: 141-167.
38. EKELÖF, G. 1959. Opus incertum. Albert Bonniers Boktryckeri, Stockholm.
39. ENVALL, M. 1996. Ototyphlonemertes correae sp. nov. and a redescription of O. duplex (Nemertea: Monostilifera: Ototyphlonemertidae), with a phylogenetic consideration of the genus. J. Zool. 238:253-277.
40. ERESHEFSKY, M. 1992. The units of evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
41. FARRIS, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner Trees. Syst. Zool. 19:83-92.
42. FARRIS, J. S. 1982. Outgroups and parsimony. Syst. Zool. 31:328-334.
43. FARRIS, J. S., A. G. KLUGE, AND M. F. MICKEVICH. 1982. Immunological distances and the phylogenetic relationships of the Rana boylii species group. Syst. Zool. 31:479-491.
44. FAUCHALD, K. 1977. The polychaete worms. Definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angel. Cty. Sci. Ser. 28:1-188.
45. FLYNN, J. J., A. R. WYSS, R. CHARRIER, AND C. C. SWISHER. 1995. An early Miocene anthropoid skull from the Chilean Andes. Nature 373:603-607.
46. GAUTHIER, J. A., R. ESTES, AND K. DE QUEIROZ. 1988. A phylogenetic analysis of Lepidosauromorpha. Pages 15-98 in Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families (R. Estes and G. Pregill, eds.). Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, California.
47. GHISELIN, M. T. 1995. Ostensive definitions of the names of species and clades. Biol. Philos. 10:219-222.
48. GRAYBEAL, A. 1995. Naming species. Syst. Biol. 44: 237-250.
49. GREUTER, W., F. R. BARRIE, H. M. BURDET, W. G. CHALONER, V. DEMOULIN, D. L. HAWKSWORTH, P. M. JØRGENSEN, D. H. NICOLSON, P. C. SILVA, P. TREHANE, AND J. MCNEILL. 1994. International code of botanical nomenclature (Tokyo Code) adopted by the Fiftenth International Botanical Congress, Yokohama, August-September 1993. Regnum Veg. 131:1-389.
50. GRIFFITHS, G. C. D. 1974. Some fundamental problems in biological classification. Syst. Zool. 22:338-343.
51. GRIFFITHS, G. C. D. 1976. The future of Linnean nomenclature. Syst. Zool. 168-173.
52. HAALAND, B., AND T. A. SCHRAM. 1982. Larval development and metamorphosis of Gyptis rosea (Malm) (Hesionidae, Polychaeta). Sarsia 67:107-118.
53. HAALAND, B., AND T. A. SCHRAM. 1983. Larval development and metamorphosis of Ophiodromus flexuosus (Delle Chiaje) (Hesionidae, Polychaeta). Sarsia 68:85-96.
54. HÄRLIN, M., AND P. SUNDBERG. 1998. Taxonomy and philosophy of names. Biol. Philos. 13:233-244.
55. HARTMANN-SCHRÖDER, G. 1962. Zweiter Beitrag zur Polychaetenfauna von Peru. Kiel. Meeresforsch. 18: 109-147.
56. HARTMANN-SCHRÖDER, G. 1974. Zur Polychaeten-fauna von Natal (Südafrika). Mitt. Hamb. Zool. Mus. Inst. 71:35-73.
57. HENNIG, W. 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin.
58. HENNIG, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana.
59. HENNIG, W. 1969. Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. W. Kramer, Frankfurt.
60. HILBIG, B. 1994. Family Hesionidae. Pages 243-269 in Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel (J. A. Blake and B. Hilbig, eds.). Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California.
61. HOLTZ, T. R., JR. 1994. The phylogenetic position of the Tyrannosauridae: Implications for theropod systematics. J. Paleontol. 68:1100-1117.
62. HOLTZ, T. R., JR. 1996. Phylogenetic taxonomy of the Coelurosaura (Dinosauria: Theropoda). J. Paleontol. 70:536-538.
63. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE. 1985. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature in association with British Museum (Natural History), London.
64. LAUBIER, L. 1967. Annélide polychètes interstitielles de Nouvelle-Calédonie. Expéd. Fr. Récifs Coralliens Nouv.-Calédonie 2:91-101
65. LEE, M. S. Y. 1996. The homologies and early evolution of the shoulder girdle in turtles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263:111-117.
66. LEE, M. S. Y. 1998. Ancestors and taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:26.
67. LIDÉN, M., AND B. OXELMAN. 1989. Species-pattern or process? Taxon 38:228-232.
68. LIDÉN, M., AND B. OXELMAN. 1996. Do we need "phylogenetic taxonomy"? Zool. Scr. 25:183-185.
69. LIDÉN, M., B. OXELMAN, A. BACKLUND, L. ANDERSSON, B. BREMER, R. ERIKSSON, R. MOBERG, I. NORDAL, K. PERSSON, M. THULIN, AND B. ZIMMER. 1997. Charlie is our darling. Taxon 46:735-738.
70. LØVTRUP, S. 1987. On species and other taxa. Cladistics 3:157-177.
71. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. Mac-Clade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
72. MAYDEN, R. L. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: The denouement in the saga of the species problem. Pages 381-424 in Species: The units of biodiversity (M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson, eds.). Chapman & Hall, London.
73. MAYR, E. 1940. Speciation phenomena in birds. Am. Nat. 74:249-278.
74. MCKITRICK, M. C., AND R. M. ZINK. 1988. Species concepts in ornithology. Condor 90:1-14.
75. MICHENER, C. D. 1963. Some future developments in taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 12:151-172.
76. MICHENER, C. D. 1964. The possible use of uninomial nomenclature to increase the stability of names in biology. Syst. Zool. 13:182-190.
77. MISHLER, B. D. 1999. Getting rid of species? Pages 307-315 in Species: new interdisciplinary essays. (R. Wilson, ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
78. MISHLER, B. D., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1982. Species concepts: A case for pluralism. Syst. Zool. 31:491-503.
79. MOORE, G. 1998. A comparison of traditional and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 47:561-579.