Chapter 12: Analysis and modeling of forestland development at the wildland/urban interface

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report PNW

Volumn , Issue 610, 2004, Pages 153-160

  Kline, Jeffrey D ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Land use change; Urabanization; Wildland urban interface

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM MODELING; FIRE MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; URBANIZATION;

EID: 11044223986     PISSN: 08874840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Amacher, G.S.; Cruz, W.; Grebner, D.; Hyde, W.F. 1998. Environmental motivations for migration: population pressure, poverty, and deforestation in the Philippines. Land Economics. 74(1): 92-101.
2. Azuma, D.L.; Birch, K.R.; DelZotto, P. [et al.]. 1999. Land use change on non-federal land in western Oregon, 1973-1994. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Forestry. 55 p.
3. Barlow, S.A.; Munn, I.A.; Cleaves, D.A.; Evans, D.L. 1998. The effect of urban sprawl on timber harvesting. Journal of Forestry. 96(12): 10-14.
4. Bengston, D.N. 1994. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Society and Natural Resources. 7: 515-533.
5. Binkley, C.S. 1981. Timber supply from private nonindustrial forests. Bull. 92. New Haven, CT: School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University. 97 p.
6. Bockstael, N.E. 1996. Modeling economics and ecology: the importance of a spatial perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 78: 1168-1180.
7. Bowes, M.D.; Krutilla, J.V.; Sherman, P.B. 1984. Forest management for increased timber and water yields. Water Resources Research. 20: 655-663.
8. Bradshaw, T.K.; Muller, B. 1998. Impacts of rapid urban growth on farmland conversion: application of new regional land use policy models and geographical information systems. Rural Sociology. 63: 1-25.
9. Chomitz, K.M.; Gray, D.A. 1996. Roads, land use, and deforestation: a spatial model applied to Belize. The World Bank Economic Review. 10: 487-512.
10. Cleaves, D.A.; Bennett, M. 1995. Timber harvesting by nonindustrial private forest land-owners in western Oregon. Western Journal of Applied Forestry. 10(2): 66-71.
11. Cockle, R. 2001. Northeast Oregon town threatened. The Oregonian. August 17. http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/xml/ story.ssf/html_standard.xsl?/base/front_page/9980493443448189.xml (10 September).
12. Davis, L.S.; Ruth, L.W.; Teeguarden, D.; Henly, R.K. 1991. Ballot box forestry. Journal of Forestry. 89(12): 10-18.
13. Dennis, D. 1989. An economic analysis of harvest behavior: integrating forest and ownership characteristics. Forest Science. 35: 1088-1104.
14. Dennis, D.F. 1990. A probit analysis of the harvest decision using pooled time-series and cross-sectional data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 18: 176-187.
15. ECONorthwest. 2000. Research report 1: density, development patterns, and definition of alternatives. Prepared for Willamette Valley Alternative Futures, Eugene, OR. On file with: ECONorthwest, 99 West 10th, Suite 400, Eugene, OR 97401.
16. Egan, A.F.; Luloff, A.E. 2000. The exurbanization of America's forests: research in rural social science. Journal of Forestry. 98(3): 26-30.
17. Englin, J.E.; Klan, M.S. 1990. Optimal taxation: timber and externalities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 18: 263-275.
18. Helmer, E.H. 2000. The landscape ecology of tropical secondary forest in montane Costa Rica. Ecosystems. 3: 98-114.
19. Hyberg, B.T.; Holthausen, D.M. 1989. The behavior of nonindustrial private forest land-owners. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 19: 1014-1023.
20. Johnson, R.L.; Alig, R.J.; Moore, E.; Moulton, R.J. 1997. Nonindustrial private land-owners' view of regulation. Journal of Forestry. 59: 23-28.
21. Kline, J.D.; Alig, R.J.; Johnson, R.L. 2000a. Forest owner incentives to protect riparian habitat. Ecological Economics. 33(1): 29-43.
22. Kline, J.D.; Alig, R.J.; Johnson, R.L. 2000b. Fostering the production of nontimber services among forest owners with heterogeneous objectives. Forest Science. 46(2): 302-311.
23. Kline, J.D.; Armstrong, C. 2001. Autopsy of a forestry ballot initiative: characterizing voter support for Oregon's Measure 64. Journal of Forestry. 99(5): 20-27.
24. Kline, J.D.; Azuma, D.L.; Moses, A. [In press]. Modeling the spatially dynamic distribution of humans in the Oregon (USA) Coast Range. Landscape Ecology.
25. Kline, J.D.; Moses, A.; Alig, R.J. 2001. Integrating urbanization into landscape-level ecological assessments. Ecosystems. 4(1): 3-18.
26. Kuuluvainen, J.; Karppinen, H.; Ovaskainen, V. 1996. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. Forest Science. 42: 300-308.
27. Larabee, M. 2001. Fire brings urban peril into focus. The Oregonian. August 12. http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/ index.ssf?/xml/story.ssf/html_standard.xsl?/base/front_page/ 9975309381909169.xml. (10 September).
28. Lorensen, T.; Birch, K.; Lettman, G. 1993. Wildfire prevention and control in areas of residential forest land development: an analysis of fire data. Tech. Bull. Salem, OR: Public Affairs Office, Oregon Department of Forestry. [Pages unknown].
29. Max, W.; Lehman, D.E. 1988. A behavioral model of timber supply. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 15: 71-86.
30. McGranahan, D.A. 1999. Natural amenities drive rural population change. Agric. Econ. Rep. 781. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 24 p.
31. Milloy, R.E. 2000. Population trends heighten West's fire woes. New York Times. August 10: Sect. A: 10.
32. Nelson, G.C.; Hellerstein, D. 1997. Do roads cause deforestation? Using satellite images in econometric analysis of land use. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 79: 80-88.
33. Newman, D.H.; Wear, D.N. 1993. Production economics of private forestry: a comparison of industrial and nonindustrial forest owners. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 75: 674-684.
34. Quinn, B. 2001. Crews abandon 10 homes to Quartz Fire. The Oregonian. August 14. http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/ index.ssf.?/xml/story.ssf/html_standard.xsl?/base/front_page/ 99779015127150166.xml. (10 September).
35. Row, C. 1978. Economies of tract size in timber growing. Journal of Forestry. 78: 576-582.
36. Schindler, B.; List, P.; Steel, B.S. 1993. Managing federal forests: public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide. Journal of Forestry. 91(7): 36-42.
37. Spies, T.A.; Reeves, G.H.; Burnett, K.M. [et al.]. 2002. Assessing the ecological consequences of forest policies in a multi-ownership province in Oregon. In: Liu, J.; Taylor, W.W., eds. Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Strang, W.J. 1983. On the optimal forest harvesting decision. Economic Inquiry. 11: 576-583.
39. Swallow, S.K.; Wear, D.N. 1993. Spatial interactions in multiple-use forestry and substitution and wealth effects for the single stand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 25: 103-120.
40. Swanson, L.L. 1986. What attracts new residents to nonmetro areas? Res. Rep. 56. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 15 p.
41. Thompson, R.; Thompson, P.; Jones, J.G. 1981. Classifying nonindustrial private forest land by tract size. Journal of Forestry. 81: 288-291.
42. Turner, M.G.; Wear, D.N.; Flamm, R.O. 1996. Land ownership and land-cover change in the southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecological Applications. 6: 1150-1172.
43. Wear, D.N.; Bolstad, P. 1998. Land-use changes in southern Appalachian landscapes: spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems. 1: 575-594.
44. Wear, D.N.; Liu, R.; Foreman, J.M.; Sheffield, R. 1999. The effects of population growth on timber management and inventories in Virginia. Forest Ecology and Management. 118(1-3): 107-115.