The effect of urban sprawl on timber harvesting. A look at two southern states

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 96, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 10-14

  Barlow, Stephen A ^a   Munn, Ian A ^a   Cleaves, David A ^b   Evans, David L ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY PRODUCTION; TIMBER HARVESTING; URBAN GROWTH;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032465033     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BEFORT, W.A., A.E. LULOFF, and M. MORRONE. 1988. Rural land use and demographic change in a rapidly urbanizing environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 16:345-56.
2. BINKLEY, C.S. 1981. Timber supply from private nonindustrial forests. Bulletin No. 92. New Haven, CT: Yale University, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.
3. CUBBAGE, F.W. 1995. Regulation of private forest practices: What rights, which policies? Journal of Forestry 93(6):14-20.
4. CUBBACE, F.W., and W.C. SIEGEL. 1985. The law regulating private forest practices. Journal of Forestry 83:538-45.
5. DEFOREST, C.E., T.G. HARRIS JR., F.W. CUBBAGE, and A.C. NELSON. 1991. Timberland downtown? Southern forest resources along the urban-rural continuum. In Proceedings of a symposium. Ecological land classification: Applications to identify the productive potential of Southern forests. Charlotte, North Carolina, January 7-9, 1991, eds. D.L. Mengel and D.T. Tew. Asheville, NC: USDA Forest Service, Southeast Forest Experiment Station.
6. DENNIS, D.F. 1989. An economic analysis of harvest behavior: Integrating forest and ownership characteristics. Forest Science 35:1,088-104.
7. _. 1990. A probit analysis of the harvest decision using pooled time series and cross-sectional data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18:176-87.
8. HARRIS, T., and C. DEFOREST. 1993. Policy implications of timberland loss, fragmentation, and urbanization in Georgia and the Southeast. In Proceedings of the 1993 Southern Forest Economics Workshop, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, April 21-23, 1993, ed. D.N. Wear. Durham, NC: Duke University.
9. LAGRO, J.A., and S.D. DEGLORIA. 1992. Land use dynamics within an urbanizing non-metropolitan county in New York State. Landscape Ecology 7: 275-89.
10. LUBKA, L. 1982. Role of the forester in land-use planning. Journal of Forestry 80:597-601.
11. MARTUS, C.E., H.L. HANEY JR., and W.C. SIEGEL. 1995. Local forest regulatory ordinances: Trends in the Eastern United States. Journal of Forestry 93(6):27-31.
12. ROMM, J., R. TUAZON, and C. WASHBURN. 1987. Relating forestry investment to the characteristics of nonindustrial private forestland owners in Northern California. Forest Science 33:197-209.
13. SHANDS, W.E. 1991. Problems and prospects at the urban-forest interface. Journal of Forestry 89(6): 23-26.
14. US DEPARTMENTOF COMMERCE. 1965. City and county data bank. 84th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
15. _. 1992. Statistical abstract of the United States. 112th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
16. VAUX, H.J. 1982. Forestry's hotseat: The urban/forest interface. American Forests 88:36-37, 44-46.
17. WEAR, D.N, and R. FLAMM. 1993. Public and private forest disturbance regimes in the Southern Appalachians. Natural Resource Modeling 7:379-97.