Autopsy of a forestry ballot initiative: Characterizing voter support of Oregon's measure 64

Journal of Forestry

Volumn 99, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 20-27

  Kline, J D ^a   Armstrong, C ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Clearcutting; Policy; Sustainable forestry

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECOSYSTEMS; HERBICIDES;

FORESTRY PRACTICES;

FORESTRY;

CLEARCUTTING; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035341446     PISSN: 00221201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Clearcut ban seen too radical by even environmentalists
2. Changing forest values and ecosystem management
3. Measure 64 could reshape Oregon's forestry landscape
4. Initiative proposes longer logging cycles
5. Cut down by voters, "64" Boosters reevaluate
6. Playing field not level for Measure 64 boosters
7. Public perceptions of clearcutting
8. Kitzhaber opposes ban on clearcuts
9. Consensus and dissension among rural and urban publics concerning forest management in the Pacific Northwest
10. Ballot box forestry
11. Private preference for collective goods revealed through voting on referenda
12. The polls-Poll trends: Environmental problems and protection
13. The exurbanization of America's forests: Research in rural social science
14. Endorsements '98
15. The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?
16. Using referendum data to characterize public support for purchasing development rights to farmland
17. Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism
18. Managing federal forests: Public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide
19. The OSAF response to Measure 64: Forestry in the spotlight
20. Conflicting values about federal forests: A comparison of national and Oregon publics
21. Social acceptability of ecosystem management in the Pacific Northwest
22. Forestry referendum rejected for third time