Dose and schedule determinants of cocaine choice under concurrent variable-interval schedules in rhesus monkeys

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 176, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 274-280

  Anderson, Karen G ^a   Woolverton, William L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice; Cocaine; Drug abuse; Matching; Monkey; Self administration

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG CHOICE; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; RHESUS MONKEY;

ANIMALS; COCAINE; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE;

EID: 10944248315     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-004-1907-6     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ahmed SH, Koob GF (1999) Long-lasting increase in the set point for cocaine self-administration after escalation in rats. Psychopharmacology 146:303-312
2. Anderson KG, Woolverton WL (2000) Concurrent variable-interval drug self-administration and the generalized matching law: a drug class comparison. Behav Pharmacol 11:413-420
3. Anderson KG, Velkey AJ, Woolverton WL (2002) The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 163:319-326
4. Baum WM (1974) On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav 22:231-242
5. Bickel WT, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST (1995) The behavioral economics of concurrent drug reinforcers: a review and reanalysis of drug self-administration research. Psychopharmacology 118:250-259
6. Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1985) Toxicity associated with long-term intravenous heroin and cocaine self-administration in the rat. JAMA 254:81-83
7. Catania AC (1963) Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav 6:299-300
8. Davison M, McCarthy D (1988) The Matching Law: a research review. Erlbaum, New Jersey
9. Deneau G, Yanagita T, Seevers MH (1969) Self-administration of psychoactive substances by the monkey. Psychopharmacologia 16:30-48
10. deVilliers P (1977) Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In: Honig WK, Staddon JER (eds) Handbook of operant behavior, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 233-287
11. Fantino E, Squires N, Delbruck N, Peterson C (1972) Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer. J Exp Anal Behav 18:35-43
12. Fleshler M, Hoffman HS (1962) A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 5:529-530
13. Herrnstein RJ (1961) Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 4:267-272
14. Herrnstein RJ (1970) On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav 13:243-266
15. Heyman GM, Luce RD (1979) Operant matching is not a logical consequence of reinforcement rate maximization. Anim Learn Behav 7:133-140
16. Heyman GM, Oldfather CM (1992) Inelastic preference for ethanol in rats: an analysis of ethanol's reinforcing effects. Psychol Sci 3:1-9
17. Higgins ST (1997) The influence of alternative reinforcers on cocaine use and abuse: a brief review. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57:419-427
18. Iglauer C, Woods JH (1974) Concurrent performances: reinforcement by different doses of intravenous cocaine in rhesus monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav 22:179-196
19. Iglauer C, Llewellyn ME, Woods JH (1976) Concurrent schedules of cocaine injection in rhesus monkeys: dose variations under independent and non-independent variable-interval procedures. Pharmacol Rev 27:367-383
20. Johanson CE, Schuster CR (1975) A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 193:676-688
21. Johanson CE, Balster RL, Bonese K (1976) Self-administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs: the effects of unlimited access. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 4:45-51
22. Mantsch JR, Ho A, Schlussman SD, Kreek MJ (2001) Predictable individual differences in the initiation of cocaine self-administration by rats under extended-access conditions are dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology 157:31-39
23. McMillan DE, Hardwick WC (1996) Pentobarbital discrimination and generalization to other drugs under multiple fixed-ratio fixed-interval schedules. Behav Pharmacol 7:285-293
24. Neuringer AJ (1967) Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding. J Exp Anal Behav 10:417-424
25. Plaud JJ (1992) The prediction and control of behavior revisited: a review of the matching law. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 23:25-31
26. Premack D (1965) Reinforcement theory. In: Levine D (ed) Nebraska Symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska, Nebraska, pp 123-180
27. Rachlin HC, Baum WM (1969) Response rate as a function of amount of reinforcement for a signaled concurrent response. J Exp Anal Behav 12:11-16
28. Roberts DC, Brebner K, Vincler M, Lynch WJ (2002) Patterns of cocaine self-administration in rats produced by various access conditions under a discrete trials procedure. Drug Alcohol Depend 67:291-299
29. Schneider JW (1973) Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances. J Exp Anal Behav 20:461-471
30. Shull RL, Pliskoff SS (1967) Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures. J Exp Anal Behav 10:517-527
31. Stolerman IP (1989) Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 97:131-138
32. Todorov JC (1973) Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances. J Exp Anal Behav 19:451-458
33. Tornatzky W, Miczek KA (2000) Cocaine self-administration "binges": transition from behavioral and autonomic regulation toward homeostatic dysregulation in rats. Psychopharmacology 148:289-298
34. Woolverton WL (1996) Intravenous self-administration of cocaine under concurrent VI schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 127:195-203
35. Woolverton WL, Alling K (1999) Choice under concurrent VI schedules: comparison of behavior maintained by cocaine or food. Psychopharmacology 141:47-56