Intravenous self-administration of cocaine under concurrent VI schedules of reinforcement

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 195-203

  Woolverton, William L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice; Cocaine; Concurrent; Matching; Rhesus monkey; Self administration

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; FEMALE; FOOD; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; RHESUS MONKEY;

EID: 0029829196     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02246127     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baum WM (1974) On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav 22: 231-242
2. Baum WM (1979) Matching, undermatching and overmatching in studies of choice. J Exp Anal Behav 32: 269-281
3. Baum WM, Rachlin HC (1969) Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav 12: 861-874
4. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Hughes JR, Rizzuto P (1992) Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. IV. The effects of response requirement on the consumption of and interaction between concurrently available coffee and cigarettes. Psychopharmacology 107: 211-216
5. Bickel WT, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST (1995) The behavioral economics of concurrent drug reinforcers: a review and reanalysis of drug self-administration research. Psychopharmacology 118: 250-259
6. Brownstein AJ, Pliskoff SS (1968) Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 11: 683-688
7. Carroll ME (1985) Concurrent phencyclidine and saccharin access: presentation of an alternative reinforcer reduces drug intake. J Exp Anal Behav 43: 131-144
8. Carroll ME, Lac ST , Nygaard SL (1989) A concurrently available nondrug reinforcer prevents the acquisition or decreases the maintenance of cocaine-reinforced behavior. Psychopharmacology 97: 23-29
9. deVilliers P (1977) Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In: Honig WK, Staddon JER (eds) Handbook of operant behavior. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 233-287
10. Findley JD (1958) Preference and switching under concurrent scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav 1: 123-144
11. Fleshler M, Hoffman HS (1962) A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 5: 529-530
12. Herrnstein RJ (1961) Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 4: 267-272
13. Herrnstein RJ (1970) On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav 13: 243-266
14. Heyman GM, Oldfather CM (1992) Inelastic preference for ethanol in rats: an analysis of ethanol's reinforcing effects. Psychol Sci 3: 1-9
15. Iglauer C, Woods JH (1974) Concurrent performances: reinforcement by different doses of intravenous cocaine in rhesus monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav 22: 179-196
16. Iglauer C, Llewellyn ME, Woods JH (1976) Concurrent schedules of cocaine injection in rhesus monkeys: dose variations under independent and non-independent variable-interval procedures. Pharmacol Rev 27: 367-383
17. Johanson CE, Schuster CR (1975) A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 193: 676-688
18. Kelleher RT (1976) Characteristics of behavior maintained by scheduled injections of drugs. Pharmacol Rev 27: 307-323
19. Keller JV, Gollub LR (1977) Duration and rate of responding as determinants of concurrent responding. J Exp Anal Behav 22: 179-196
20. Lamas X, Negus, SS, Hall, E, Mello NK (1995) Relationship between the discriminative stimulus effects and plasma concentrations of intramuscular cocaine in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 121: 331-338
21. Meisch RA, Lemaire GA (1988) Oral self-administration of pentobarbital by rhesus monkeys: relative reinforcing effects under concurrent fixed-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 50: 75-86
22. Nader MA, Woolverton WL (1991) Effects of increasing the magnitude of an alternative reinforcer on drug choice in a discretetrials choice procedure. Psychopharmacology 105: 169-174
23. Nader MA, Woolverton WL (1992a) Effects of increasing response requirement on choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 108: 295-300
24. Nader MA, Woolverton WL (1992b) Further characterization of adjunctive behavior generated by schedules of cocaine self-administration. Behav Pharmacol 3: 65-74
25. Schuster CR, Johanson CE (1981) An analysis of drug-seeking behavior in animals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 5: 315-323
26. Shull RL, Pliskoff SS (1967) Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures. J Exp Anal Behav 10: 517-527
27. Takahashi M (1994) Concurrent schedule control of monkey's observing during vigilance. Behav Proc 32: 133-146
28. Todorov JC, Castro JMO, Hanna ES, Bittencourt de Sa MCN, Barreto MQ (1983) Choice, experience and the generalized matching law. J Exp Anal Behav 40: 99-111
29. Williams BA (1988) Reinforcement, choice and response strength. In: Atkinson RC, Herrnstein RJ, Lindzey G, Luce RD (eds) Steven's handbook of experimental psychology, 2nd edn, vol. 2: learning and cognition. Wiley, New York, pp 167-244