Civil-military affairs and security institutions in the Southern Cone: The sources of Argentine-Brazilian nuclear cooperation

Latin American Politics and Society

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 29-60

  Sotomayor Velázquez, Arturo C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONSHIP; DEMOCRATIZATION; GEOPOLITICS; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; NUCLEAR POWER;

ARGENTINA; BRAZIL; SOUTH AMERICA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 10844235694     PISSN: 1531426X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lap.2004.0053     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Acharya, Amitav. 1998. Beyond Anarchy: Third World Instability and International Order After the Cold War. In International Relations Theory and the Third World, ed. Stephanie G. Neuman. New York: St. Martin's Press: 159-211.
2. Acuna, Carlos H., and William C. Smith. 1994. The Politics of Arms Production and the Arms Race Among New Democracies of Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. In Security, Democracy, and Development in U.S.-Latin American Relations, ed. Lars Schoultz, Smith, and Augusto Varas. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 199-240.
3. Adler, Emmanuel. 1987. The Power of Ideology: The Quest for Technical Autonomy in Argentina and Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Agüero, Felipe. 1992. The Military and the Limits to Democratization in South America. In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: the New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, ed. Scott Mainwaring, Guillermo O'Donnell, and J. Samuel Valenzuela. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 153-98.
5. Agüero, Felipe. 1995. Soldiers, Civilians, and Democracy: Post-Franco Spain in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Albright, David. 1989. Bomb Potential for South America. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 45, 4 (May): 16-20.
7. Brooke, James. 1990. Brazil Uncovers Plan by Military to Build Atom Bomb and Stops It. New York Times, October 9: A1.
8. Byman, Daniel L., and Kenneth M. Pollack. 2001. Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In. International Security 25, 4 (Spring): 107-46.
9. Carasales, Julio César. 1997. De rivales a socios: el proceso de cooperación nuclear entre Argentina y Brasil. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Latinoamericano.
10. Castro Madero, Carlos, and Esteban A. Takacs. 1991. Política nuclear argentina: ¿avance o retroceso? Buenos Aires: Librería El Ateneo.
11. Child, Jack. 1985. Geopolitics and Conflict in South America: Quarrels Among Neighbors. New York: Praeger.
12. Child, Jack. 1990. The Status of South American Geopolitical Thinking. In South America in the 1990s: Evolving International Relationship in a New Era, ed. G. Pope Atkins. Colorado: Westview Press. 53-85.
13. Corrales, Javier. 1999. Regimes of Cooperation in the Western Hemisphere: Power, Interests, and Intellectual Traditions. International Studies Quarterly 43, 1 (May): 1-36.
14. David, Steven R. 1991. Explaining Third World Alignment. World Politics 43, 2 (January): 233-56.
15. Doyle, Michael W. 1997. Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New York: W. W. Norton.
16. Escudé, Carlos, and Andrés Fontana. 1998. Argentina's Security Policy. In International Security and Democracy: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Post-Cold War Era, ed. Jorge I. Domínguez. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 51-79.
17. Evangelista, Matthew. 1991. Sources of Moderation in Soviet Security Policy. In Behavior, Society, and Nuclear War, vol. 2, ed. Philip E. Tetlock et.al. New York: Oxford University Press. 315-16.
18. Goldblat, Jozef, ed. 1985. Non-proliferation: The Why and the Wherefore. London: Taylor and Francis.
19. Goldman, Joe. 1991. Argentina, Brazil Open to Inspections. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 47, 4 (May): 8-10.
20. Haggard, Stephan, and Beth Simmons. 1987. Theories of International Regimes. International Organization 41, 3 (Summer): 491-517.
21. Harrison, Anne H. 1990. UPI News Analysis: Argentine-Brazilian Nuclear Agreement Based in Business. U.P.I. News Service, November 29.
22. Herspring, Dale H. 1996. Russian Civil-Military Relations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
23. Hirst, Mónica. 1995. Security Policies, Democratization, and Regional Integration in the Southern Cone. In International Security and Democracy: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Post-Cold War Era, ed. Jorge I. Domínguez. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 102-18.
24. Holsti, Kalevi J. 1996. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hunter, Wendy. 1997. Eroding Military Influence in Brazil: Politicians Against Soldiers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
26. Hurrell, Andrew. 1998a. Security in Latin America. International Affairs 74, 3: 210-33.
27. Hurrell, Andrew. 1998b. An Emerging Security Community in South America? In Security Communities, ed. Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 243-45.
28. Hurrell, Andrew, and Louise Fawcett, eds. 1995. Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. International Atomic Energy Organization (IAEO).
30. Job, Brian L. 1992. The Insecurity Dilemma: National, Regime, and State Securities in the Third World. In The Insecurity Dilemma: National Security of Third World States, ed. Job. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 11-35.
31. Kaufman, Stuart J. 1994. Organizational Politics and Change in Soviet Military Policy. World Politics 46 (April): 355-82.
32. Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
33. Keohane, Robert O. 1993. Institutionalist Theory and the Realist Challenge After the Cold War. In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, ed. David A. Baldwin. New York: Columbia University Press. 270-300.
34. Kessler, Richard J. 1989. Peronists Seek "Nuclear Greatness." Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 45, 5 (May): 13-15.
35. Krasno, Jean. 1994. Non-proliferation: Brazil's Secret Nuclear Program. Orbis 38, 3 (Summer): 425-36.
36. Leventhal, Paul L., and Sharon Tanzer, eds. 1992. Averting a Latin American Nuclear Arms Race: New Prospects and Challenges for Argentine-Brazilian Nuclear Cooperation. New York: St. Martin's Press.
37. Lijphart, Arend J. 1971. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review 65 (September): 690-93.
38. Los Angeles Times. 1990. Brazil Probe Finds a Bomb-Plan. December 7: 2.
39. Mansfield, Edward D., and Jack Snyder. 1996. Democratization and the Danger of War. In Debating the Democratic Peace, ed. Michael E. Brown, Sean M. Lynn-Jones, and Steven E. Miller. Cambridge: MIT Press. 301-34.
40. March, James, and Johan Olsen. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Features in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78, 3 (September): 734-49.
41. Mares, David R. 1991. Escenarios de seguridad en Europa Oriental y en América Latina. Estudios Internacionales 23, 93 (January-March): 19-41.
42. Martins Filho, Joao R., and Daniel Zirker. 2000. The Brazilian Military Under Cardoso: Overcoming the Identity Crisis. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 42, 3 (Fall): 143-70.
43. Mearsheimer, John J. 1994-95. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19, 3: 5-49.
44. Milner, Helen. 1992. International Theories of Cooperation. World Politics 44, 3 (April): 466-96.
45. Moe, Terry M. 1990. Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 213-53.
46. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1999. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Democracy and Political Uncertainty in Postwar Europe. Paper presented at the Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University, December 8.
47. Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Democracy and Political Uncertainty in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54, 2: 217-52.
48. Neuman, Stephanie G. 1998. International Relations Theory and the Third World: An Oxymoron? In International Relations Theory and the Third World, ed. Neuman. New York: St. Martin's Press. 1-29.
49. Nohlen, Dieter, and Mario Fernández B. 1991. Democratizació n y política exterior. Análisis comparado en torno a tres casos: Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay. Estudios Internacionales 24, 94 (April-June): 229-59.
50. Norden, Deborah L. 1996. Military Rebellion in Argentina: Between Coups and Consolidation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
51. O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1988. Challenges to Democratization in Brazil. World Policy Journal 5, 2 (Spring): 281-300.
52. O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1996. Illusions About Consolidation. Journal of Democracy 7, 3 (April): 34-51.
53. O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1986. Transition from Authoritarian Rule (Tentative Conclusions). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
54. Pion-Berlin, David. 1991. Between Confrontation and Accommodation: Military and Government Policy in Democratic Argentina. Journal of Latin American Studies 23, 3 (October): 543-71.
55. Pion-Berlin, David. 1998. From Confrontation to Cooperation: Democratic Governance and Argentine Foreign Relations. In Civil-Military Relations: Building Democracy and Regional Security in Latin America, Southern Asia, and Central Europe, ed. David R. Mares. Boulder: Westview Press. 79-100.
56. Posen, Barry R. 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars. New York: Cornell University Press.
57. Preston, Julia. 1991. Brazil's Leader Brings Vigorous Image, Mixed Record. Washington Post, June 18: A18.
58. Redick, John R. 1972. Military Potential of Latin American Nuclear Energy Programs. Beverly Hills: Sage.
59. Redick, John R., Julio C. Carasales, and Paulo S. Wrobel. 1995. Nuclear Rapprochement: Argentina, Brazil, and the Nonproliferation Regime. Washington Quarterly 18, 1 (Winter): 107-22.
60. Reiss, Mitchell. 1995. Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain Their Nuclear Capabilities. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
61. Rice, Condolezza. 1989. Gorbachev and the Military: A Revolution in Security Policy, Too? Harriman Institute Forum 2, 4: 1-8.
62. Robinson, Eugene. 1992. South America Steps Back from Atomic Brink: Brazil, Argentina Stand Down After Decades of Racing to Obtain Nuclear Arms. Washington Post, January 26: A24.
63. Rojas Aravena, Francisco. 1994. Security Regimes in the Western Hemisphere: A View from Latin America. In Security, Democracy, and Development in U.S.-Latin American Relations, ed. Lars Schoultz, William C. Smith, and Augusto Varas. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 171-97.
64. Russell, Roberto. 1990. Conflicto y armamentismo en América Latina. In Desarme y desarrollo en América Latina, ed. Mónica Hirst et al. Buenos Aires: Fundación para la Democracia y la Paz. 61-67.
65. Russell, Roberto, and Mónica Hirst. 1987. Democracia y polí tica exterior: los casos de Argentina y Brasil. Estudios Internacionales 20, 80 (October-December): 442-90.
66. Russett, Bruce, 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
67. Russett, Bruce, John R. Oneal, and David R. Davis. 1998. The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950-85. International Organization 52, 3 (Summer): 441-67.
68. Schmitter, Philippe C. 1991. Change in Regime Type and Progress in International Relations. In Progress in Postwar International Relations, ed. Emanuel Adler and Beverly Crawford. New York: Columbia University Press. 89-124.
69. Selcher, Wayne A, ed. 1981. Brazil in the International System: The Rise of a Middle Power. Boulder: Westview Press.
70. Serrano, Mónica. 1994. Brazil and Argentina. In Nuclear Proliferation After the Cold War, ed. Mitchell Reiss and Robert S. Litwak. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. 231-55.
71. Silverstein, Ken. 1991. Brazil's Intelligence Chief Asked to Explain Secret Nuclear Project. Associated Press, August 14.
72. Snyder, Jack. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: W. W. Norton.
73. Solingen, Etel. 1998. Regional Orders at Century's Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
74. Stepan, Alfred. 1971. The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
75. Stepan, Alfred, and Cindy Skach. 1993. Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarism versus Presidentialism. World Politics 46, 1 (October): 1-22.
76. Ullman, Richard H. 1991. Securing Europe. Princeton: Princeton Universiy Press.
77. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
78. Weitsman, Patricia A. 1997. Intimate Enemies: The Politics of Peacetime Alliances. Security Studies 7, 1 (Autumn): 156-92.
79. Wrobel, Paulo S. 1999. From Rivals to Friends: The Role of Public Declarations in Argentine-Brazilian Rapprochement. In Declaratory Diplomacy: Rhetorical Initiatives and Confidence Building, ed. Michael Krepon, Jenny S. Drezin, and Michael Newbill. Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center. 135-51.
80. Zagorski, Paul W. 1994. Civil-Military Relations and Argentine Democracy: The Armed Forces Under the Menem Government. Armed Forces and Society 20, 3 (Spring): 423-37.
81. Zaverucha, Jorge. 1998. The 1988 Brazilian Constitution and Its Authoritarian Legacy: Formalizing Democracy While Gutting Its Essence. Journal of Third World Studies 15, 1: 105-24.