Testing similarity measures with continuous and discrete protein models

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 144-157

  Wallin, Stefan ^a   Farwer, Jochen ^b   Bastolla, Ugo ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TÉCNICA AEROESPACIAL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Distance measure; Protein folding; Protein structure comparison; Root meansquare deviation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENERGY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 0037233516     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10271     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Venclovas C, Zemla A, Fidelis K, Moult J. Comparison of performance in successive CASP experiments. Proteins Struct Funct Genetics 2001;Suppl 5:163-170.
2. Holm L, Sander C. The FSSP database of structurally aligned protein fold families. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:3600-3609.
3. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. CATH: A hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997;5:1093-1108.
4. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
5. Koehl P. Protein structure similarities. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2001;11:348-353.
6. May ACW. Towards more meaningful hierarchical classification of amino acid scoring matrices. Protein Eng 1999;12:707-712.
7. Orengo CA, Swindells MB, Michie AD, Zvelebil MJ, Driscoll PC, Waterfield MD, Thornton JM. Structural similarity between the pleckstrin homology domain and verotoxin: the problem of measuring and evaluating structural similarity. Protein Sci 1995;4:1977-1983.
8. Feng ZK, Sippl MJ. Optimum superimposition of protein structures: ambiguities and implications. Fold Des 1996;1:123-132.
9. Godzik A. The structural alignment between two proteins: Is there a unique answer? Protein Sci 1996;5:1325-1338.
10. Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973;181:223-230.
11. Bryngelson JD, Wolynes PG. Spin-glasses and the statistical-mechanics of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987;84: 7524-7528.
12. Garel T, Orland H. Mean-field model for protein folding. Europhys Lett 1988;6:307-310.
13. Shakhnovich EI, Gutin AM. Formation of unique structure in polypeptide chains: theoretical investigation with the aid of a replica approach. Biophys Chem 1989;34:187-199.
14. Shakhnovich EI, Gutin AM. Engineering of stable and fast-folding sequences of model proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:7195-7199.
15. Shakhnovich EI. Proteins with selected sequences fold into unique native conformation. Phys Rev Lett 1994;24:3907-3910.
16. Abkevich VI, Gutin AM, Shakhnovich EI. Free energy landscapes for protein folding kinetics - intermediates, traps and multiple pathways in theory and lattice model simulations. J Chem Phys 1994;101:6052-6062.
17. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D. Factors governing the foldability of proteins. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1996;26:411-441.
18. Bastolla U, Frauenkron H, Gerstner E, Grassberger P, Nadler W. Testing a new Monte Carlo algorithm for protein folding. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1998;32:52-66.
19. Tiana G, Broglia RA, Roman HE, Vigezzi E, Shakhnovich EI. Folding and misfolding of designed protein-like chains with mutations. J Chem Phys 1998;108:757-761.
20. Bastolla U, Roman HE, Vendruscolo M. Neutral evolution of model proteins: diffusion in sequence space and overdispersion. J Theor Biol 1999;200:49-64.
21. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996; 258:367-392.
22. Irbäck A, Sjunnesson F, Wallin S. Three-helix-bundle protein in a Ramachandran model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:13614-13618.
23. Irbäck A, Sjunnesson F, Wallin S. Hydrogen bonds, hydrophobicity forces and the character of the collapse transition. J Biol Phys 2001;27:169-179.
24. Favrin G, Irbäck A, Wallin S. Folding of a small helical protein using hydrogen bonds and hydrophobicity forces. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2002;47:99-105.
25. Park BH, Levitt M. The complexity and accuracy of discrete state models of protein structure. J Mol Biol 1995;249:493-507.
26. von Neumann J. Some matrix-inequalities and metrization of matric-space. Tomsk Univ Rev 1937;1:286-300.
27. Kabsch W. A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallog A 1978;34:827-828.
28. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Size-independent comparison of protein three-dimensional structures. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1995;22:273-283.
29. Levitt M. A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J Mol Biol 1976;104:59-107.
30. Cohen FE, Sternberg JE. On the prediction of protein structure: the significance of the root-mean-square deviation. J Mol Biol 1980;138:321-333.
31. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Significance of root-mean-square deviation in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;235:625-634.
32. Vendruscolo M, Subramanian B, Kanter I, Domany E, Lebowitz J. Statistical properties of contact maps. Phys Rev E 1999;59:977-984.
33. Bastolla U, Frauenkron H, Grassberger P. Phase diagram of random heteropolymers: replica approach and application of a new Monte Carlo algorithm. J Mol Liq 2000;84:111-129.
34. Chan HS, Kaya H, Shimizu S. Computational methods for protein folding: scaling a hierarchy of complexities. In: Jiang T, Xu Y, Zhang MQ, editors. Current topics in computational molecular biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002. p 403-447.
35. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993;233:123-138.
36. Holm L, Sander C. Mapping the protein universe. Science 1996;273: 595-602.
37. Rooman MJ, Kocher JA, Wodak SJ. Prediction of protein backbone conformation based on seven structure assignments. J Mol Biol 1991;221:961-979.
38. Bastolla U, Farwer J, Knapp EW, Vendruscolo M. How to guarantee optimal stability for most representative structures in the Protein Data Bank. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2001;44:79-96.
39. Krantz BA, Srivastava AK, Nauli S, Baker D, Sauer RT, Sosnick TR. Understanding protein hydrogen bond formation with kinetic H/D amide isotope effects. Nature Struct Biol 2002;9:458-463.