Orthographic revision: A developmental study of how revisers check verbal agreements in written texts

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 533-550

  Largy, Pierre ^a,c   Dédéyan, Alexandra ^a   Hupet, Michel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; SEMANTICS;

EID: 10244235352     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/0007099042376382     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht, Boston & London: Kluwer Academic.
2. Anderson, J.R. (1993). Learning and memory. An integrated approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Beers, C.S., & Beers, J.W. (1992). Children's spelling of English inflectional morphology. In S. Templeton & D.R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy (pp.231-251). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bock, J.K., & Miller, C.A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45-93.
5. Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591-620.
6. Cameron, C.A., Edmunds, G., Wigmore, B., Hunt, A.K., & Linton, M.J. (1997). Children's revision of textual flaws. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 667-680.
7. Dubois, J. (1965). Grammaire structurale du français: Nom et pronom. Paris: Larousse.
8. Ellis, A.W. (1979). Slips of the pen. Visible Language, 13, 265-282.
9. Fayol, M., & Largy, P. (1992). Une approche cognitive fonctionelle de l'orthographe grammaticale. Les erreurs d'accord sujet-verbe chez l'enfant et l'adulte. Langue Française, 95, 80-98.
10. Fayol, M., Hupet, M., & Largy, P. (1999). The acquisition of subject-verb agreement in written French: From novices' to experts' errors. Reading and Writing, 11, 153-174.
11. Fayol, M., Largy, P., & Lemaire, P. (1994). Cognitive overload and orthographic errors. A study in French written language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 437-464.
12. Francis, W.N. (1986). Proximity concord in English. Journal of English Linguistics, 19, 309-318.
13. Hacker, D.J., Plumb, C., Butterfield, E.C., Quathamer, D., & Heineken, E. (1994). Text revision: Detection and correction of errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 65-78.
14. Hayes, J.R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1-28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Hotopf, W.H.N. (1983). Lexical slips of the pen and tongue: What they tell us about language production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (Vol. 2, pp.147-199). New York: Academic Press.
16. Hupet, M., Fayol, M., & Schelstraete, M.A. (1998). Effects of semantic variables on the subject-verb agreement processes in writing. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 59-75.
17. Lambert, E., & Chesnet, D. (2001). Novlex: Une base de données lexicales pour les èlèves de primaire. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 277-288.
18. Largy, P. (2001). La révision des accords nominal et verbal chez l'enfant. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 221-245.
19. Largy, P., & Dédéyan, A. (2002). Automatisme en détection d'erreurs d'accord sujet-verbe: Etude chez l'enfant et l'adulte. L'Année Psychologique, 102, 201-234.
20. Largy, P., Fayol, M., & Lemaire, P. (1996). The homophone effect in written French: The case of noun-verb inflection errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 217-255.
21. Logan, G.D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatisation. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
22. Logan, G.D. (1992). Automaticity and memory. In W.E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays in honor of Bennett Murdock (pp.234-248). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp.249-308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. McDonald, J.L., & Heilenman, K. (1991). Determinants of cue strength in adult first and second language speakers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 238-261.
25. Pearlmutter, N.J., Garnsey, S.M., & Bock, J.K. (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 427-456.
26. Totereau, C., Thévenin, M.G., & Fayol, M. (1997). Acquisition de la morphologie du nombre en français. In L. Rieben, M. Fayol & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Des orthographes et leur acquisition (pp. 147-163). Lausanne & Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.
27. Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 186-215.
28. Yagelski, R.P. (1995). The role of classroom context in the revision strategies of student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 216-238.