Mad Cow Disease: An Empirical Investigation of Restaurant Strategies and Consumer Response

Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 358-368

  Reynolds, Dennis ^a   Balinbin, William M ^a  

^a 335 Statler Hall   (United States)

Author keywords

consumer behavior; food safety; risk aversion

Indexed keywords

EID: 10144248759     PISSN: 10963480     EISSN: 15577554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1096348003251394     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Jack in the Box franchisees cite parent concern in surf.New York Times. 1993;:C3.
2. Consumer preferences for food safety attributes: A market segment approach.Agribusiness. 1994;10:319-324.
3. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual strategies and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173-1182.
4. Worriers and non-worriers among consumers about farmers' use of pesticides.Journal of Consumer Affairs. 1968;2 (2): 189-204.
5. Constructive consumer choice processes.Journal of Consumer Research. 1998;25:187-217.
6. Estimates of death toll from Mad Cow Disease vary widely.New York Times. 2001;:F6.
7. Confidence lost and-partially-regained: Consumer response to food scares.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2000;43:471-485.
8. Pesticide residue concerns and shopping location likelihood.Agribusiness. 1994;10:491-501.
9. Economics of food safety. New York: Elsevier; 1991:29-44.
10. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1983:.
11. Traditional butchery methods linked to v-CJD cluster.British Medical Journal. 2001;322:753-754.
12. Pesticide residues and consumer valuation of food safety.American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1995;76:760-771.
13. Economics of food safety. New York: Elsevier; 1991:45-66.
14. Cattle plagues past and present: The mystery of Mad Cow Disease.Journal of Contemporary History. 1998;33:215-228.
15. Consumer willingness to pay to avoid pesticide residues.Statistica Sinica. 1993;3:351-366.
16. Publication participation in medical screening programs: A sociopsychological study (PHS Pub. No. 572). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1958:.
17. Simultaneous-equation model for estimating consumer risk perceptions, attitudes, and willingness-to-pay for residue-free produce.Journal of Consumer Affairs. 1993;27 (2): 377-389.
18. International financial statistics, vol. LIV. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2001:.
19. A comparison of perspectives about the critical areas of knowledge for safe food handling in food establishments.Journal of Environmental Health. 1998;60:8-15.
20. Genetic and environmental factors modify bovine spongiform encephalopathy incubation period in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Conference, Washington, DC; Washington, DC: National Academy of Science;. 7402.
21. Panelists say mad-cow disease is no threat to U.S. foodservice.Nation's Restaurant News. 2001;:74.
22. Evaluation of food safety education for consumers.Journal of Nutrition Education. 2001;33:27-34.
23. Who's afraid of food?.American Demographics. 1990;:40-43.
24. Changing risk perception and food-handling practices of Oregon household food prepares.Journal of Consumer Studies & Home Economics. 1997;21:117-130.
25. Consumer pesticide concerns: A 1965 and 1984 comparison.Journal of Consumer Affairs. 1987;21 (1): 96-106.
26. Food safety: An application of the Health Belief Model.Journal of Nutritional Education. 1993;25:17-23.
27. Ambiguous argument as advocacy in organizational crisis communication.Argumentation & Advocacy. 1995;31:138-150.
28. Observed choices for food safety in retail, survey, and auction markets.American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1999;81 (5): 1192-1199.
29. Sales loss determination in food contamination incidents: An application to milk bans in Hawaii.American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1988;70:513-520.
30. Public interest in foreign news.International Journal for Mass Communication Studies. 1980;26:149.
31. The effect of BSE: Consumer perceptions and beef purchasing behavior.British Food Journal. 1992;94 (9): 23-27.
32. Economic loss resulting from microbial contamination of food. Proceedings of the Second National Conference for Food Protection; Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;. 151.
33. Consistent questions of ambiguity in organizational crisis communication: Jack in the Box as a case study.Journal of Business Ethics. 2000;25:143-155.
34. Economics of food safety. New York: Elsevier; 1991:155-174.
35. The theoretical benefits of food safety policies: A total economic value framework.American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1996;78:1291-1296.
36. An investigation of the rationality of consumer valuations of multiple health risks.RAND Journal of Economics. 1987;18 (4): 465-479.
37. Valuing food safety and nutrition. Boulder, CO: Westview; 1995:51-68.