Developing a matrix to explore the relationship between partnering and total quality management in construction

Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (New Series)

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 422-427

  Tang, Wen Zhe ^a   Duffield, Colin F ^a   Young, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Partnering; Relationship; Total quality management (TQM)

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; COSTS;

CONSTRUCTION PROJECT; PARTNERING; PROJECT PERFORMANCE; PROJECT SUCCESS INDEX;

TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 10044263325     PISSN: 10059113     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. EGAN. Rethinking Construction [R]. Department of the Environment, Transportation and Regions, 1998.
2. FORBES L H. Lean method in construction [A]. First International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century-Challenged and Opportunities for Management and Technology [C]. Miami: [s.n.], 2002. 459-466.
3. GALLO G, LUCAS G, MCLENNAN A, et al. Project documentation quality and its impact on efficiency in the building and construction industry [R]. Australia: CSIRO, 2002.
4. European Construction Institute (ECI). Implementing TQ in the Construction Industry [M]. London: Thomas Telford, 1996.
5. KUBAL M T. Engineered Quality in Construction: Partnering and TQM [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
6. KUBAL M. The future of engineered quality[J]. J Mgmt Eng, 1996, 12(5): 45-52.
7. ARDITI D, GUANAYDIN H M. Total quality management in the construction process [J]. Int J Proj Magmt, 1997, 15(4): 235-243.
8. MCGEORGE D, PALMER A. Construction Management-New Directions [M]. Blackwell: [s.n.], 1997.
9. CARR F, HURTADO K, LANCASTER C, et al. Partnering in construction-A practical guide to project success [A]. American Bar Association [C]. USA: [s.n.], 1999.
10. HOQUE Z. TQM and the balanced scorecard approach: A critical analysis of their potential relationships and directions for research [J]. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2003, 14: 553-556.
11. TAM C M, HUI M Y T. Total Quality Management in a public transport organisation in Hong Kong[J]. Int J Proj Management, 1996, 14(5): 311-315.
12. Australian Standard (AS-HB35), Stepping Stones-a practical, criteria-based approach to Total Quality Management [S]. Standards Australia, 1992.
13. CHASE G W. Improving construction methods: A story about quality [J]. J Mgmt Eng, 1998(3): 31-33.
14. BAYRAMOGLU S. Partnering in Construction: Improvement through Integration and Collaboration [J]. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 2001, 7: 39-43.
15. CHINYIOE A, OLOMOLAIYEPO, CORBETT P. An evaluation of the project needs of UK building clients [J]. Int J Proj Mgmt, 1998, 16(6): 385-391.
16. Chartered Institute of Building. Code of practice for project management for construction and management [A]. Blackwell[C]. UK: [s.n.], 2002.
17. BENNETT J, JAYES S. The Seven Pillars of Partnering [M]. London: Thomas Telford, 1998.
18. COX A, TOWNSEND M. Strategic Procurement in Construction: Towards Better Practice in the Management of Construction Supply Chain [M]. London: Thomas Telford, 1998.
19. SCOTT B. Partnering in Europe [M]. London: Thomas Telford, 2001.
20. SCHULTZEL H J, UNRUH V P. Successful Partnering: Fundamentals for Project Owners and Contractors [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1996.
21. THOMPSON P J, SANDERS S R. Partnering Continuum [J]. J Mgmt Eng, 1998, 14(5): 73-78.
22. WANG Y, GIBSON G E. Scope Definition and project risk analysis [A]. First International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century-Challenged and Opportunities for Management and Technology [C]. Miami: [s.n.], 2002. 111-118.