Genotype prediction using a dense map of SNPs

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 375-384

  Evans, David M ^a   Cardon, Lon R ^a   Morris, Andrew P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Association studies; Disease gene mapping; Linkage disequilibrium

Indexed keywords

AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; COMPARATIVE GENE MAPPING; DENSITY; DISEASE MARKER; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC MODEL; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; PREDICTION; RACE DIFFERENCE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 20; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 10044221854     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20045     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Smith JD, Krugylak L, Nickerson DA. 2003. Additional SNPs and linkage-disequilibrium analyses are necessary for whole-genome association studies in humans. Nat Genet 33:518-521.
2. Couzin J. 2002. Genomics: New mapping project splits the community. Science 296:1391-1393.
3. Excoffier L, Slatkin M. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Mol Biol Evol 12:921-927.
4. Hudson RR. 2002. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18:337-338.
5. International HapMap Consortium. 2003. The International HapMap Project. Nature 426:789-796.
6. Kang SJ, Gordon D, Brown AM, Ott J, Finch SJ. 2004. Tradeoff between no-call reduction in genotyping error rate and loss of sample size for genetic case/control association studies. Pac Symp Biocomput 9:116-127.
7. Ke X, Hunt S, Tapper W, Lawrence R, Stavrides G, Ghori J, Whittaker P, Collins A, Morris AP, Bentley D, Cardon LR, Deloukas P. 2004. The impact of SNP density on fine scale patterns of linkage disequilibrium. Hum Mol Genet 13:577-588.
8. Lam JC, Roeder K, Devlin B. 2000. Haplotype fine mapping by evolutionary trees. Am J Hum Genet 66:659-673.
9. Liu JS, Sabatti C, Teng J, Keats BJ, Risch N. 2001. Bayesian analysis of haplotypes for linkage disequilibrium mapping. Genome Res 11:1716-1724.
10. McPeek MS, Strahs A. 1999. Assessment of linkage disequilibrium by the decay of haplotype sharing, with application to fine-scale genetic mapping. Am J Hum Genet 65:858-875.
11. Morris AP, Whittaker JC, Balding DJ. 2002. Fine-scale mapping of disease loci via shattered coalescent modeling of genealogies. Am J Hum Genet 70:686-707.
12. Morris AP, Whittaker JC, Xu CF, Hosking LK, Balding DJ. 2003. Multipoint linkage-disequilibrium mapping narrows location interval and identifies mutation heterogeneity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:13442-13446.
13. Morris AP, Whittaker JC, Balding DJ. 2004. Little loss of information due to unknown phase for fine-scale linkage-disequilibrium mapping with single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 74:945-953.
14. Nordborg M. 2001. Coalescent theory. In: Balding DJ, Bishop M, Cannings C editors. Handbook of statistical genetics. Chichester, UK: Wiley. p 179-212.
15. Rannala B, Reeve JP. 2001. High-resolution multipoint linkage-disequilibrium mapping in the context of a human genome sequence. Am J Hum Genet 69:159-178.
16. Weiss KM, Clark AG. 2002. Linkage disequilibrium and the mapping of complex human traits. Trends Genet 18:19-24.
17. Weiss KM, Terwilliger JD. 2000. How many diseases does it take to map a gene with SNPs? Nat Genet 26:151-157.
18. Zondervan KT, Cardon LR. 2004. The complex interplay among factors that influence allelic association. Nat Rev Genet 5:89-100.