Impact of founder population, drift and selection on the genetic diversity of a recently translocated tree population

Heredity

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 542-550

  Lefevre F ^a   Fady, B ^a   Fallour Rubio, D ^a,b   Ghosn, D ^a,c   Bariteau, M ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b Parc National des Pyrenees   (France)

^c MEDITERRANEAN AGRONOMIC INSTITUTE OF CHANIA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Cedrus; Disequilibrium; Drift; Population admixture; Selection

Indexed keywords

ISOENZYME;

EVOLUTION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; SELECTION; TREE;

ARTICLE; CEDRUS; EVOLUTION; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

CEDRUS; EVOLUTION; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC MARKERS; ISOENZYMES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

CEDRUS; CEDRUS ATLANTICA; EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 10044221746     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800549     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Austerlitz F, Mariette S, Machon N, Gouyon PH, Godelle B (2000). Effects of colonization processes on genetic diversity: differences between annual plants and tree species. Genetics 154: 1309-1321.
2. Bariteau M, Ferrandes P (1992). Les Cèdres. In: Gallais A, Bannerot H (eds) Amélioration des Espèces Végétales Cultivées, INRA Editions: Paris, France. pp 732-743.
3. Barton NH, Keightley PD (2002). Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 3: 11-21.
4. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Goudet J, Chikhi L, Bonhomme F (1998) GENETIX, software for population genetic data analysis, Laboratoire Génome et Populations, CNRS UPR 9060, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France.
5. Byers DL, Waller DM (1999). Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30: 497-513.
6. Carson HL (1990). Increased genetic variance after a population bottleneck. Trends Ecol Evol 5: 228-230.
7. Cointat M (1996). Le roman du cèdre. Rev For Fr 48: 503-526.
8. Comps B, Gömöry D, Letouzey J, Thiébaut B, Petit RJ (2001). Diverging trends between heterozygosity and allelic richness during postglacial colonization in the European beech. Genetics 157: 389-397.
9. Cornelius J (1993). Heritabilities and additive genetic coefficients of variation in forest trees. Can J Forest Res 24: 372-379.
10. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996). Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144: 2001-2014.
11. Dawson KJ, Belkhir K (2001). A Bayesian approach to the identification of panmictic populations and the assignment of individuals. Genet Res 78: 59-77.
12. Dodd ME, Silvertown J (2000). Size-specific fecundity and the influence of lifetime size variation upon effective population size in Abies balsamea. Heredity 85: 604-609.
13. Ducousso A, Guyon JP, Kremer A (1996). Latitudinal and altitudinal variation of bud burst in western populations of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt). Liebl.) Ann Sci For 53: 775-782.
14. Endler JA (1986). Natural Selection in the Wild. Monographs in Population Biology No21, May RM (ed), Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
15. Epperson BK (1992). Spatial structure of genetic variation within populations of forest trees. New Forests 6: 257-278.
16. Espinel S, Aragonés A, Ritter E (1995). Performance of different provenances and of the local population of the Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don.) in northern Spain. Ann Sci For 52: 515-519.
17. Fallour D (1998). Evolution et structuration spatiale de la diversité du cèdre de l'Atlas sur le Petit Luberon: approches écologique, dendroécologique et génétique. PhD Thesis, University of Aix-Marseille III, France.
18. Fallour D, Fady B, Lefèvre F (2001). Evidence of variation in segregation patterns within a Cedrus population. J Hered 92: 260-266.
19. Farris MA, Mitton JB (1984). Population density, outcrossing rate, and heterozygote superiority in Ponderosa pine. Evolution 38: 151-1154.
20. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Sherman-Broyles SL (1992). Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6: 95-124.
21. Kaufman SR, Smouse PE (2001). Comparing indigenous and introduced populations of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake: response of seedlings to water and pH levels. Oecologia 127: 487-494.
22. Krouchi F, Derridj A, Lefèvre F (2004). Year and tree effect on reproductive organisation of Cedrus atlantica in a natural forest. Forest Ecol Manage 197: 181-189.
23. Le Corre V, Machon N, Petit RJ, Kremer A (1997). Colonization with long-distance seed dispersal and genetic structure of maternally inherited genes in forest trees: a simulation study. Genet Res 69: 117-125.
24. Ledig FT (1986). Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in outbreeding plants. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers: MA, Sunderland. pp 77-104.
25. Ledig FT (2000). Founder effects and the genetic structure of Coulter pine. J Hered 91: 308-315.
26. Lenormand T (2002). Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 183-189.
27. Morand ME, Brachet S, Rossignol P, Dufour J, Frascaria-Lacoste N (2002). A generalized heterozygote deficiency assessed with microsatellites in French common ash populations. Mol Ecol 11: 377-385.
28. Nei M (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
29. Otto SP, Whitlock MC (1997). The probability of fixation in populations of changing size. Genetics 146: 723-733.
30. Peterken GF (2001). Ecological effects of introduced tree species in Britain. Forest Ecol Manag 141: 31-42.
31. Pichot C (1993). Analyse de dispositifs par approches itératives prenant en compte les performances des plus proches voisins. Agronomie 13: 109-119.
32. Pinyopusarerk K, Williams ER (2000). Range-wide provenance variation in growth and morphological characteristics of Casuarina equisetifolia grown in Northern Australia. Forest Ecol Manag 134: 219-232.
33. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1998). BOTTLENECK. A program for detecting recent effective population size reductions from allelic frequency data, INRA-URLB, Laboratoire de Modélisation et Biologie Evolutive, Montpellier, France.
34. Plessas ME, Strauss SH (1986). Allozyme differentiation among populations, stands, and cohorts in Monterey pine. Can J Forest Res 16: 1155-1164.
35. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995). GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86: 248-249.
36. Reed DH, Frankham R (2001). How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution 55: 1095-1103.
37. Rehfeldt GE, Wykoff WR, Ying CC (2001). Physiological plasticity, evolution, and impacts of a changing climate on Pinus contorta. Climat Change 50: 355-376.
38. Reznick DN, Ghalambor CK (2001). The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112/113: 183-198.
39. Skrøppa T, Kohmann K (1997). Adaptation to local conditions after one generation in Norway spruce. Forest Genet 4: 171-177.
40. S-PLUS (1996). Version 3.4. MathSoft, Inc.: Seattle, Washington.
41. Scaltsoyiannes A (1999). Allozyme differentiation and phylogeny of cedar species. Silvae Genet 48: 61-68.
42. Toth J (1978). Contribution à l'étude de la fructification et de la régénération du cèdre de l'Atlas (Cedrus atlantica M.) dans le sud de la France. PhD Thesis, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques Aix-Marseille III, France.
43. Vicaire H (1864). Reboisement des montagnes. Compte-rendu des travaux de 1863. Ministère des Finances, Administration des Forêts, Paris, Imprimerie Impériale.
44. Weir BS (1990). Genetic Data Analysis. Methods for Discrete Population Genetic Data, Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers: Sunderland, MA.
45. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
46. Yazdani R, Muona O, Rudin D, Szmidt AE (1985). Genetic structure of a Pinus sylvestris L. seed-tree stand and naturally regenerated understory. Forest Sci 31: 430436.
47. Zheng YQ, Ennos RA (1999). Genetic variability and structure of natural and domesticated populations of Caribbean pine (Pinus caribaea Morelet). Theor Appl Genet 98: 765-771.