What SNP Genotyping Errors Are Most Costly for Genetic Association Studies?

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 132-141

  Kang, Sun Jung ^a   Gordon, Derek ^b   Finch, Stephen J ^a  

^a Stony Brook University   (United States)

^b ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chi square; Cost; Error detection; Genotype error; Linkage disequilibrium; Noncentrality parameter; Test of independence

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ERROR; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; HOMOZYGOTE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALLELES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE; SELECTION BIAS; SOFTWARE;

GOES;

EID: 0942276432     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10301     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Armitage P. 1955. Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 11:375-386.
2. Bross I. 1954. Misclassification in 2 × 2 tables. Biometrics 10:478-486.
3. Brzustowicz LM, Merette C, Xie X, Townsend L, Gilliam TC, Ott J. 1993. Molecular and statistical approaches to the detection and correction of errors in genotype databases. [erratum appears in Am J Hum Genet 1994;54:1132]. Am J Hum Genet 53:1137-1145.
4. Brzustowicz LM, Merette C, Xie X, Townsend L, Gilliam TC, Ott J. 1993. Molecular and statistical approaches to the detection and correction of errors in genotype databases. [erratum appears in Am J Hum Genet 1994;54:1132]. Am J Hum Genet 53:1137-1145.
5. Chakravarti A. 1999. Population genetics - making sense out of sequence. Nat Genet 21:56-60.
6. Cochran WG. 1952. The chi-square test of goodness of fit. Ann Math Stat 23:315-345.
7. Desan PH, Oren DA, Malison R, Price LH, Rosenbaum J, Smoller J, Charney DS, Gelernter J. 2000. Genetic polymorphism at the CLOCK gene locus and major depression. Am J Hum Genet 96:418-421.
8. Douglas JA, Boehnke M, Lange K. 2000. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data. Am J Hum Genet 66:1287-1297.
9. Douglas JA, Skol AD, Boehnke M. 2002. Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data. Am J Hum Genet 70:487-495.
10. Ehm MG, Kimmel M, Cottingham RW Jr. 1996. Error detection for genetic data, using likelihood methods. Am J Hum Genet 58:225-234.
11. Ewen KR, Bahlo M, Treloar SA, Levinson DF, Mowry B, Barlow JW, Foote SJ. 2000. Identification and analysis of error types in high-throughput genotyping. Am J Hum Genet 67:727-736.
12. Fallin D, Cohen A, Essioux L, Chumakov I, Blumenfeld M, Cohen D, Schork NJ. 2001. Genetic analysis of case/control data using estimated haplotype frequencies: application to APOE locus variation and Alzheimer's disease. Genome Res 11:143-151.
13. Gordon D, Heath SC, Ott J. 1999. True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Hered 49:65-70.
14. Gordon D, Leal SM, Heath SC, Ott J. 2000. An analytic solution to single nucleotide polymorphism error-detection rates in nuclear families: implications for study design. In: Pac Symp Biocomput. p 663-674.
15. Gordon D, Heath SC, Liu X, Ott J. 2001. A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data. Am J Hum Genet 69:371-380.
16. Gordon D, Finch SJ, Nothnagel M, Ott J. 2002. Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: application to single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Hered 54:22-33.
17. Gordon D, Levenstien MA, Finch SJ, Ott J. 2003. Errors and linkage disequilibrium interact multiplicatively when computing sample sizes for genetic case-control association studies. In: Pac Symp Biocomput. p 490-501.
18. Kirk KM, Cardon LR. 2002. The impact of genotyping error on haplotype reconstruction and frequency estimation. Eur J Hum Genet 10:616-622.
19. Lange K, Goradia TM. 1987. An algorithm for automatic genotype elimination. Am J Hum Genet 40:250-256.
20. Lathrop GM, Huntsman JW, Hooper AB, Ward RH. 1983. Evaluating pedigree data. II. Identifying the cause of error in families with inconsistencies. Hum Hered 33:377-389.
21. Martin ER, Lai EH, Gilbert JR, Rogala AR, Afshari AJ, Riley J, Finch KL, Stevens JF, Livak KJ, Slotterbeck BD, Slifer SH, Warren LL, Conneally PM, Schmechel DE, Purvis I, Pericak-Vance MA, Roses AD, Vance JM. 2000. SNPing away at complex diseases: analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms around APOE in Alzheimer disease. Am J Hum Genet 67:383-394.
22. Miller CR, Joyce P, Waits LP. 2002. Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using maximum likelihood. Genetics 160:357-366.
23. Mitra SK. 1958. On the limiting power function of the frequency chi-square test. Ann Math Stat 29:1221-1233.
24. Mote VL, Anderson RL. 1965. An investigation of the effect of misclassification on the properties of chi square-tests in the analysis of categorical data. Biometrika 52:95-109.
25. O'Connell JR, Weeks DE. 1998. PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 63:259-266.
26. Rice KM, Holmans P. 2003. Allowing for genotyping error in analysis of unmatched cases and controls. Ann Hum Genet 67:165-174.
27. Saito M, Saito A, Kamatani N. 2002. Web-based detection of genotype errors in pedigree data. J Hum Genet 47:377-379.
28. Sasieni PD. 1997. From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size. Biometrics 53:1253-1261.
29. Sobel E, Papp JC, Lange K. 2002. Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics. Am J Hum Genet 70:496-508.
30. Stringham HM, Boehnke M. 1996. Identifying marker typing incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 59:946-950.
31. Thomas GB, Finney RL, Weir MD, Giordano FR. 2000. Thomas' calculus. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32. Xu L, Liu G, Miller DP, Zhou W, Lynch TJ, Wain JC, Su L, Christiani DC. 2002. Counterpoint: the myeloperoxidase -463G → A polymorphism does not decrease lung cancer susceptibility in caucasians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1555-1559.
33. Zou G, Pan D, Zhao H. 2003. Genotyping error detection through tightly linked markers. Genetics 164:1161-1173.