Construction and Reactivity Screening of a Surface Composition Gradient for Combinatorial Discovery of Electro-Oxidation Catalysts

Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 27-31

  Jayaraman, Shrisudersan ^a   Hillier, Andrew C ^a  

^a Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON MONOXIDE; HYDROCARBON; HYDROGEN; INDIUM; MOLYBDENUM; OSMIUM; PLATINUM; POLYMER; PROTON; RUTHENIUM; TIN;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CATALYST; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CRYSTAL; DIFFUSION; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTRODE; OXIDATION; PARTICLE SIZE; SCREENING; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS; THEORETICAL MODEL; VAPOR;

EID: 0942268102     PISSN: 15204766     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/cc034030k     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Rawlings, R. Mater. World 1995, 3, 474-475.
2. Marple, B. R.; Boulanger, J. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1994, 77, 2747-2750.
3. Neubrand, A.; Rodel, J. Z. Metallkunde 1997, 88, 358-371.
4. Ruardy, T. G.; Schakenraad, J. M.; vanderMei, H. C.; Busscher, H. J. Surf. Sci. Rep. 1997, 29, 3-30.
5. Xiang, X.-D.; Sun, X.; Briceno, G.; Lou, Y.; Wang, K.-A.; Chang, H.; Wallace-Freedman, W. G.; Chen, S.-W.; Schultz, P. G. Science 1995, 268, 1738-1740.
6. Taylor, S. J.; Morken, J. P. Science 1998, 280, 267-270.
7. Reddington, E.; Sapienza, A.; Gurau, B.; Viswanathan, R.; Sarangapani, S.; Smotkin, E. S.; Mallouk, T. E. Science 1998, 280, 1735-1737.
8. Ertl, G.; Neumann, M.; Streit, K. M. Surf. Sci. 1977, 64, 393-410.
9. Appleby, A. J.; Foulkes, F. R. Fuel Cell Handbook; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1989.
10. Gasteiger, H. A.; Markovic, N. M.; Ross, P. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 8290-8301.
11. Chaudhury, M. K.; Whitesides, G. M. Science 1992, 256, 1539-1541.
12. Elwing, H.; Gölander, C. G. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1990, 32, 317-339.
13. Dertinger, S. K. W.; Chiu, D. T.; Jeon, N. L.; Whitesides, G. M. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1240-1246.
14. Fuierer, R. R.; Carroll, R. L.; Feldheim, D. L.; Gorman, C. B. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 154.
15. Tingey, M. L.; Luk, Y. Y.; Abbott, N. L. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 1224.
16. Balss, K. M.; Coleman, B. D.; Lansford, C. H.; Haasch, R. T.; Bohn, P. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 8970-8978.
17. Jayaraman, S.; Hillier, A. C. Langmuir 2001, 17, 7857-7864.
18. Lee, K. Y. C.; Klingler, J. F.; McConnell, H. M. Science 1994, 263, 655-658.
19. Groves, J. T.; Boxer, S. G.; McConnell, H. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 935-938.
20. Meredith, J. C.; Smith, A. P.; Karim, A.; Amis, E. J. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 9747-9756.
21. Meredith, J. C.; Karim, A.; Amis, E. J. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 5760-5762.
22. Wu, T.; Efimenko, K.; Genzer, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9394-9395.
23. Liedberg, B.; Tengvall, P. Langmuir 1995, 11, 3821-3827.
24. Lestelius, M.; Engquist, I.; Tengvall, P.; Chaudhury, M. K.; Liedberg, B. Colloids Surf., B 1999, 15, 57-70.
25. 4, and a potential pulse program with a square wave with potential limits of 0.5 V and -1.0 V vs RHE and a frequency of 100 Hz was applied for 5 min. This resulted in the reduction of the metal ions on the ITO surface forming a co-deposited PtxRuy catalyst gradient. The agarose gel was removed subsequently by dissolving it in a boiling water bath, leaving behind the metal deposit on the substrate.
26. y gradient, the photoresist was removed by immersing the substrate in photoresist remover (Microposit remover 1165, Shipley, Marlborough, MA) for ∼2 min. The substrate was cleaned thoroughly with deionized water before performing any further experiments.
27. Cattaneo, C.; de Pinto, M. I. S.; Mishima, H.; de Mishima, B. A. L.; Lescano, D.; Cornaglia, L. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1999, 461, 32-39.
28. Jayaraman, S.; Hillier, A. C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5221-5230.
29. Bard, A. J.; Mirkin, M. V. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy, 1st ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001.
30. Shah, B. C.; Hillier, A. C. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2000, 147, 3043-3048.
31. Bard, A. J.; Mirkin, M. V.; Unwin, P. R.; Wipf, D. O. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 1861-1868.
32. The spatial resolution of the SECM is related to the tip size and the tip-substrate separation. The best point-to-point resolution is on the order of the diameter of the active tip area.
33. Cussler, E. L. Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, 1997.
34. 3+t)).
35. The tip was scanned well beyond the catalyst region and onto the bare ITO regions. The ITO regions exhibited a pure negative feedback because they are catalytically inactive toward the hydrogen oxidation reaction. This facilitates identifying the edges of the catalyst region as seen by the UME tip, which in turn provides an absolute indexing of the various catalyst compositions as a function of distance, and hence, a one-to-one correspondence with the composition data measured by EDS.
36. 4 for ∼10 min. CO was then removed from solution by purging with nitrogen for a period of 15 min with the substrate under potential control.
37. Watanabe, M.; Motoo, S. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1975, 60, 275-283.
38. Jambunathan, K.; Shah, B. C.; Hudson, J. L.; Hillier, A. C. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2001, 500, 279-289.
39. -1 for the present system.