Repeated Measures Interaction Test with Aligned Ranks

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 433-461

  Kowalchuk, Rhonda K ^c   Keselman, H J ^a   Algina, James ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0842346702     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3804_2     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Agresti A. & Pendergast, J. (1986). Comparing mean ranks for repeated measures data. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 15, 1417-1433.
2. Akritas, M. G. & Arnold, S. F. (1994). Fully nonparametric hypotheses for factorial designs I: Multivariate repeated measures designs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 336-343.
3. Algina, J. (1994). Some alternative approximate tests for a split plot design. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 365-384.
4. Algina, J. (1997). Generalization of improved general approximation tests to split-plot designs with multiple between-subjects factors and/or multiple within-subjects factors. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 50, 243-252.
5. Algina, J. & Keselman, H. J. (1997). Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariances are heterogeneous: Revisiting the robustness of the Welch-James test. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 255-274.
6. Algina, J. & Keselman, H. J. (1998). A power comparison of the Welch-James and improved general approximation tests in the split-plot design. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 152-169.
7. Algina, J. & Oshima, T. C. (1994). Type I error rates for Huynh's general approximation and improved general approximation tests. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 151 -165.
8. Algina, J. & Oshima, T. C. (1995). An improved general approximation test for main effect in split-plot design. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 149-160.
9. Beasley, T. M. (2000). Nonparametric tests for analyzing interactions among intra-block ranks in multiple group repeated measures designs. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 20-59.
10. Beasley, T. M. (2002). Multivarite aligned rank test for interactions in multiple group repeated measures designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 197-226.
11. Blair, R. C., Sawilowsky, S. S., & Higgins, J. J. (1987). Limitations of the rank transform statistic in tests for interactions. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 16, 1133-1145.
12. Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144-152.
13. Catellier, D. J. & Muller, K. E. (2000). Tests for Gaussian repeated measures with missing data in small samples. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1101-1114.
14. Conover, W. J. & Iman, R.R. (1981). Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. The American Statistician, 35, 124-133.
15. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
16. Fleishman, A. I. (1978). A method for simulating non-normal distributions. Psychometrika, 43, 521-532.
17. Gross, A. M. (1976). Confidende interval robustness with long-tailed symmetric distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 409-416.
18. Hall, P. (1986). On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval. Annals of Statistics, 14, 1431-1452.
19. Hall, P. & Padmanabhan, A. R. (1992). On the bootstrap and the trimmed mean. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 41, 132-153.
20. Headrick, T. C. & Sawilowsky, S. S. (1999). Simulating correlated multivariate nonnormal distributions extending the Fleishman power method. Psychometrika, 64, 25-35.
21. Higgins, J. J. & Tashtoush, S. (1994). An aligned rank transform test for interaction. Nonlinear World, 1, 201-211.
22. Huynh, H. (1978). Some approximate tests for repeated measurement designs. Psychometrika, 43, 161-175.
23. James, G. S. (1951). The comparison of several groups of observations when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika, 38, 324-329.
24. James, G. S. (1954). Tests of linear hypotheses in univariate and multivariate analysis when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika, 41, 19-43.
25. Johansen, S. (1980). The Welch-James approximation to the distribution of the residual sum of squares in a weighted linear regression. Biometrika, 67, 85-92.
26. Keselman, H. J. & Algina, J. (1996). The analysis of higher-order repeated measures designs. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology: Vol. 4 (pp. 45-70). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27. Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2001). The analysis of repeated measures designs: A review. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 1-20.
28. Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2002). A comparison of data analysis strategies for testing omnibus effect in higher-order repeated measures designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 331 -357.
29. Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., Kowalchuk, R. K., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1999a). The analysis of repeated measurements: A comparison of mixed-model Satterthwaite F-tests and a nonpooled adjusted degrees of freedom multivariate test. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 28, 2967-2999.
30. Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., Kowalchuk, R. K., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1999b). A comparison of recent approaches to the analysis of repeated measurements. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 63-78.
31. Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., Wilcox, R. R., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2000). Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariance matrices are heterogeneous: Revisiting the robustness of the Welch-James test again. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 925-938.
32. Keselman, H. J., Carriere, K. C., & Lix, L. M. (1993). Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariance matrices are heterogeneous. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 305-319.
33. Keselman, H. J., Huberty, C. J, Lix, L. M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R. A., Donohue, B., Kowalchuk, R. K., Lowman, L. L., Petosky, M. D., Keselman, J. C., & Levin, J. R. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68, 350-386.
34. Keselman, H. J., Keselman, J. C., & Lix, L. M. (1995). The analysis of repeated measurements: Univariate tests, multivariate tests, or both? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 319-338.
35. Keselman, H. J., Kowalchuk, R. K., Algina, J., Lix, L. M., & Wilcox, R. R. (2000). Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: Trimmed means and bootstrapping. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 175-191.
36. Keselman, H. J., Kowalchuk, R. K., & Boik, R. J. (2000). An examination of the robustness of the Empirical Bayes and other approaches for testing main and interaction effects in repeated measures designs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 51-67.
37. Keselman, H. J., Wilcox, R. R., & Lix, L. M. (2003). A generally robust approach to hypothesis testing in independent and correlated groups designs. Psychophysiology, 40, 586-596.
38. Keselman, H. J., Wilcox, R. R., Othman, A. R., & Fradette, K. (2002). Trimming, transforming statistics and bootstrapping: Circumventing the biasing effects of heteroscedasticity and normality. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 1, 288-309.
39. Keselman, J. C. & Keselman, H. J. (1990). Analysing unbalanced repeated measures designs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 265-282.
40. Keselman, J. C., Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (1996). The analysis of repeated measurements: A quantitative research synthesis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 275-298.
41. Kowalchuk, R. K., Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., & Wolfinger, R. D. (in press). The analysis of repeated measurements with mixed-model adjusted F-tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
42. Kowalchuk, R. K., Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (1996, June). The analysis of repeated measures designs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Banff, AB, Canada.
43. Lecoutre, B. (1991). A correction for the approximate test in repeated measures designs with two or more independent groups. Journal of Educational Statistics, 16, 371-372.
44. Lix, L. M. & Keselman, H. J. (1995). Approximate degrees of freedom tests: A unified perspective on testing for mean equality. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 547-560.
45. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
46. Rogan, J. C., Keselman, H. J., & Mendoza, J. L. (1979). Analysis of repeated measurements. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 32, 269-286.
47. Salter, K. C. & Fawcett, R. F. (1993). The ART test of interaction: A robust and powerful rank test of interaction in factorial models. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 22, 137-153.
48. SAS Institute. (1989). SAS/STAT software: Usage and reference, version 6. Cary, NC: Author.
49. SAS Institute. (1999). SAS/STAT users guide, version 7. Cary NC: Author.
50. Sawilowsky, S. S. (1990). Nonparametric tests for interaction in experimental design. Review of Educational Research, 60, 91-126.
51. Thompson, G. L. (1991a). A note on the rank transformation for interactions. Biometrika, 78, 697-701.
52. Thomspon, G. L. (1991b). A unified approach to rank tests for multivariate and repeated measures designs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 410-419.
53. Thompson, G. L. (1993). Correction: A note on the rank transformation for interactions. Biometrika, 89, 711.
54. Thompson, G. L. & Ammann, L. P. (1990). Efficiencies of interblock rank statistics for repeated measures designs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 519-528.
55. Toothaker, L. E. & Newman, D. (1994). Nonparametric competitors in the two-way ANOVA. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19, 237-273.
56. Vargha, A. & Delaney, H. D. (1998). The Kruskal-Wallis test and stochastic homogeneity. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 170-192.
57. Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of Student's problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34, 28-35.
58. Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika, 38, 330-336.
59. Westfall, P. H. & Young, S. S. (1993). Resampling-based multiple testing. New York: Wiley.
60. Wilcox, R. R. (1990). Comparing the means of two independent groups. Biometrical Journal, 32, 771-780.
61. Wilcox, R. R. (1994). Some results on the Tukey-McLaughlin and Yuen methods for trimmed means when distributions are skewed. Biometrical Journal, 36, 259-273.
62. Wilcox, R. R. (1995a). ANOVA: A paradigm for low power and misleading measures of effect size? Review of Educational Research, 65, 51-77.
63. Wilcox, R. R. (1995b). Three multiple comparisons procedures for trimmed means. Biometrical Journal, 37, 643-656.
64. Wilcox, R. R. (1997). Pairwise comparisons using trimmed means or M-estimators when working with dependent groups. Biometrical Journal, 39, 677-688.
65. Wilcox, R. R. (1998). The goals and strategies of robust methods. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 1-39.
66. Wilcox, R. R., Keselman, H. J., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (1998). Can tests for treatment group equality be improved?: The bootstrap and trimmed means conjecture. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 123-134.
67. Zimmerman, D. W. & Zumbo, B. D. (1993). Relative power of the Wilcoxon Test, the Friedman test and repeated measures ANOVA on ranks. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 75-86.