Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: Trimmed means and bootstrapping

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 175-191

  Keselman, H J ^a   Kowalchuk, Rhonda K ^a   Algina, James ^b   Lix, Lisa M ^c   Wilcox, Rand R ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c Saskatchewan Health   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039333352     PISSN: 00071102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000711000159286     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Algina, J. (1994). Some alternative approximate tests for a split plot design. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 365-384.
2. Algina, J. (1997). Generalization of improved general approximation tests to split-plot designs with multiple between-subjects factors and/or multiple within-subjects factors. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 50, 243-252.
3. Algina, J., & Keselman, H. J. (1997). Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariances are heterogeneous: Revisiting the robustness of the Welch-James test. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 225-274.
4. Algina, J., & Keselman, H. J. (1998). A power comparison of the Welch-James and Improved General Approximation tests in the split-plot design. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 152-169.
5. Algina, J., & Oshima, T. C. (1994). Type I error rates for Huynh's general approximation and improved general approximation tests. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 151-165.
6. Algina, J., & Oshima, T. C. (1995). An improved general approximation test for the main effect in a split-plot design. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 149-160.
7. Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144-152.
8. Coombs, W. T., Algina, J., & Oltman, D. O. (1996). Univariate and multivariate omnibus hypothesis tests selected to control Type I error rates when population variances are not necessarily equal. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 66, 137-179.
9. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
10. Gross, A. M. (1976). Confidence interval robustness with long-tailed symmetric distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 409-416.
11. Hall, P. (1986). On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval. Annals of Statistics, 14, 1431-1452.
12. Hall, P., & Padmanabhan, A. R. (1992). On the bootstrap and the trimmed mean. Journal of Multivariate Analysis.41, 132-153.
13. Huber, P. J. (1993). Projection pursuit and robustness. In S. Morgenthalcr, E. Ronchetti & W. Stahel (Eds.), New directions in statistical data analysis and robustness. Boston: Birkhäuser Verlag.
14. Huynh, H. (1978). Some approximate tests for repeated measurement designs. Psychometrika, 43, 161-175.
15. Huynh, H. & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69-82.
16. James, G. S. (1951). The comparison of several groups of observations when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika, 38, 324-329.
17. James, G. S. (1954). Tests of linear hypotheses in univariate and multivariate analysis when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika, 41, 19-43.
18. Johansen, S. (1980). The Welch-James approximation of the distribution of the residual sum of squares in weighted linear regression. Biometrika, 67, 85-92.
19. Johnson, M. F., Ramberg, J. S., & Wang, C. (1982). The Johnson translation system in Monte Carlo studies. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 11, 521-525.
20. Keselman, H. J., & Algina, J. (1996). The analysis of higher-order repeated measures designs. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology, Volume 4 (pp. 45-70). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
21. Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., Kowalchuk, R. K., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1999a). A comparison of recent approaches to the analysis of repeated measurements. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 63-78.
22. Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., Kowalchuk, R. K., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1999b). The analysis of repeated measurements: A comparison of mixed-model Satterthwaite F tests and a nonpooled adjusted degrees of freedom multivariate test. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 28, 2967-2999.
23. Keselman, H. J., Carriere, K. C., & Lix, L. M. (1993). Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariance matrices are heterogeneous. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 305-319.
24. Keselman, H. J., Huberty, C. J., Lix, L. M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R. A., Donahue, B., Kowalchuk, R. K., Lowman, L. L., Petoskey, M. D., Keselman, J. C., & Levin, J. R. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA. MANOVA and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 350-386.
25. Keselman, H. J., Kowalchuk, R.K., & Boik, R. J. (2000). An examination of the robustness of the empirical Bayes and other approaches for testing main and interaction effects in repeated measures designs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 51-67.
26. Keselman, H. J., Kowalchuk, R. K., & Lix, M. (1998). Robust nonorthogonal analyses revisited: An update based on trimmed means. Psychometrika, 63, 145-163.
27. Keselman, H. J. & Lix, L. M. (1997). Analysing multivariate repeated measures designs when covariance matrices are heterogeneous. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 50, 319-338.
28. Keselman, J. C., & Keselman, H. J. (1990). Analysing unbalanced repeated measures designs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 265-282.
29. Lecoutre, B. (1991). A correction for the ∈̃ approximate test in repeated measures designs with two or more independent groups. Journal of Educational Statistics, 16, 371-372.
30. Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (1995). Approximate degrees of freedom tests: A unified perspective on testing for mean equality. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 547-560.
31. Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (1998). To trim or not to trim: Tests of location equality under heteroscedasticity and nonnormality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 409-429.
32. Lix, L. M., Keselman, H. J., & Algina, J. (1997, April). Trimmed means in split-plot repeated measures designs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
33. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
34. Rosenberger, J. L., & Gasko, M. (1983). Comparing location estimators: Trimmed means, medians, and trimean. In D. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, & J. Tukey (Eds.), Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis (pp. 297-336). New York: Wiley.
35. SAS Institute (1989). SAS/IML software: Usage and reference, Version 6. Cary NC: SAS.
36. Sawilowsky S. S., & Blair, R. C. (1992). A more realistic look at the robustness and Type II error probabilities of the t test to departures from population normality. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 352-360.
37. Tukey, J. W. (1960). A survey of sampling from contaminated normal distributions. In I. Olkin et al. (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38. Welch, B. L. (1938). The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika, 29, 350-362.
39. Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of Student's problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34, 28-35.
40. Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika, 38, 330-336.
41. Westfall. P. H., & Young, S. S. (1993). Resampling-based multiple testing. New York: Wiley.
42. Wilcox, R. R. (1994a). A one-way random effects model for trimmed means. Psychometrika, 59, 289-306.
43. Wilcox, R. R. (1994b). Some results on the Tukey-McLaughlin and Yuen methods for trimmed means when distributions are skewed. Biometrical Journal, 36, 259-273.
44. Wilcox, R. R. (1995a). ANOVA: A paradigm for low power and misleading measures of effect size? Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 51-77.
45. Wilcox, R. R. (1995b). Three multiple comparison procedures for trimmed means. Biometrical Journal, 37, 643-656.
46. Wilcox, R. R. (1997a). Pairwise comparisons using trimmed means of M-estimators when working with dependent groups. Biometrical Journal, 39, 677-688.
47. Wilcox, R. R. (1997b). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48. Wilcox, R. R. (1998). The goals and strategies of robust methods. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 1-39.
49. Wilcox, R. R., Keselman, H. J., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (1998). Can tests for treatment group equality be improved? The bootstrap and trimmed means conjecture. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 123-134.
50. Wilcox, R. R., Keselman, H. J., Muska, J., & Cribbie, R. (2000). Repeated measures ANOVA: Some new results on comparing trimmed means and means. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 69-82.
51. Yuen, K. K. (1974). The two-sample trimmed t for unequal population variances. Biometrika, 61, 165-170.