Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariance matrices are heterogeneous: Revisiting the robustness of the Welch-James test again

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 925-938

  Keselman, H J ^a   Algina, James ^b   Wilcox, Rand R ^c   Kowalchuk, Rhonda K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034339715     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00131640021970998     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Algina, J. (1994). Some alternative approximate tests for a split plot design. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 365-384.
2. Algina, J. (1997). Generalization of improved general approximation tests to split-plot designs with multiple between-subjects factors and/or multiple within-subjects factors. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 50, 243-252.
3. Algina, J., & Keselman, H. J. (1997). Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariances are heterogeneous: Revisiting the robustness of the Welch-James test. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 255-274.
4. Algina, J., & Keselman, H. J. (1998). A power comparison of the Welch-James and improved general approximation tests in the split-plot design. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 152-169.
5. Algina, J., & Oshima, T. C. (1994). Type I error rates for Huynh's general approximation and improved general approximation tests. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 151-165.
6. Algina, J., & Oshima, T. C. (1995). An improved general approximation test for the main effect in a split plot design. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 149-160.
7. Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144-152.
8. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
9. Gross, A. M. (1976). Confidence interval robustness with longtailed symmetric distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 409-416.
10. Hall, P. (1986). On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval. Annals of Statistics, 14, 1431-1452.
11. Hall, P., & Padmanabhan, A. R. (1992). On the bootstrap and the trimmed mean. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 41, 132-153.
12. Huber, P. J. (1981). Robust statistics. New York: Wiley.
13. Huynh, H. (1978). Some approximate tests for repeated measurement designs. Psychometrika, 43, 161-175.
14. James, G. S. (1951). The comparison of several groups of observations when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika, 33, 324-329.
15. James, G. S. (1954). Tests of linear hypotheses in univariate and multivariate analysis when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika, 41, 19-43.
16. Johansen, S. (1980). The Welch-James approximation of the distribution of the residual sum of squares in weighted linear regression. Biometrika, 67, 85-92.
17. Johnson, M. F., Ramberg, J. S., & Wang, C. (1982). The Johnson translation system in Monte Carlo studies. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 11, 521-525.
18. Keselman, H. J., & Algina, J. (1996). The analysis of higher-order repeated measures designs. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology, volume 4 (pp. 45-70). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
19. Keselman, H. J., Carriere, K. C., & Lix, L. M. (1993). Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariance matrices are heterogeneous. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 305-319.
20. Keselman, H. J., Huberty, C. J., Lix, L. M., Olejnik, S., Cribbie, R. A., Donahue, B., Kowalchuk, R. K., Lowman, L. L., Petoskey, M. D., Keselman, J. C., & Levin, J. R. (1998). Statistical practices of educational researchers: An analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA and ANCOVA analyses. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 350-386.
21. Keselman, H. J., Kowalchuk, R. K., Algina, J., Lix, L. M., & Wilcox, R. R. (in press). Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: Trimmed means and bootstrapping. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.
22. Keselman, H. J., Kowalchuk, R. K., & Lix, L. M. (1998). Robust nonorthogonal analyses revisited: An update based on trimmed means. Psychometrika, 63, 145-163.
23. Keselman, J. C., & Keselman, H. J. (1990). Analysing unbalanced repeated measures designs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 265-282.
24. Lecoutre, B. (1991). A correction for the approximate test in repeated measures designs with two or more independent groups. Journal of Educational Statistics, 16, 371-372.
25. Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (1995). Approximate degrees of freedom tests: A unified perspective on testing for mean equality. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 547-560.
26. Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (1998). To trim or not to trim: Tests of location equality under heteroscedasticity and nonnormality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 409-429.
27. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
28. Rosenberger, J. L., & Gasko, M. (1983). Comparing location estimators: Trimmed means, medians, and trimean. In D. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, & J. Tukey (Eds.), Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis (pp. 297-336). New York: Wiley.
29. SAS Institute. (1989). SAS/IML software: Usage and reference, Version 6. Cary, NC: Author.
30. Sawilowsky, S. S., & Blair, R. C. (1992). A more realistic look at the robustness and Type II error probabilities of the t test to departures from population normality. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 352-360.
31. Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of Students' problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34, 28-35.
32. Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika, 38, 330-336.
33. Westfall, P. H., & Young, S. S. (1993). Resampling-based multiple testing. New York: Wiley.
34. Wilcox, R. R. (1994a). A one-way random effects model for trimmed means. Psychometrika, 59, 289-306.
35. Wilcox, R. R. (1994b). Some results on the Tukey-McLaughlin and Yuen methods for trimmed means when distributions are skewed. Biometrical Journal, 36, 259-273.
36. Wilcox, R. R. (1995a). ANOVA: A paradigm for low power and misleading measures of effect size? Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 51-77.
37. Wilcox, R. R. (1995b). Three multiple comparison procedures for trimmed means. Biometrical Journal, 37, 643-656.
38. Wilcox, R. R. (1997a). Pairwise comparisons using trimmed means or M-estimators when working with dependent groups. Biometrical Journal, 39, 677-688.
39. Wilcox, R. R. (1997b). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. New York: Academic Press.
40. Wilcox, R.R. (1998). The goals and strategies of robust methods. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 1-39.
41. Wilcox, R. R., Keselman, H. J., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (1998). Can tests for treatment group equality be improved?: The bootstrap and trimmed means conjecture. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 123-134.