Evaluation of the UME-21 Initiative at 18 Medical Schools between 1999 and 2001

Family Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue SUPPL., 2004, Pages

  Veloski, J Jon ^a   Barzansky, Barbara ^b  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CURRICULUM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FAMILY PRACTICE; FORECASTING; GOALS; HUMANS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0842343460     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Wood DL. Educating physicians for the 21st century. Acad Med 1998;73:1280-1.
2. Pascoe JM, Babbott D, Pye KL, Rabinowitz HK, Veit KJ, Wood DL. The UME-21 project: connecting medical education and medical practice. Fam Med 2004;36(January suppl):S12-S14.
3. Shuster AL. Medical education: can we do better? Acad Med 1998;73:Sv-Svi.
4. Blake RL. Preface. Increasing the production of generalist physicians: experiences of the RWJ Foundation's GPI. Acad Med 1999;74:Svii-Sviii.
5. Kahn N, Davis, A, Wilson, M, et al. The interdisciplinary generalist curriculum (IGC) project: an overview of its experience and outcomes. Acad Med 2001;76:S9-S12.
6. Harris DL, Starnaman SM, Henry RC, Bland CJ. Multidisciplinary education outcomes of the W.K. Kellogg Community Partnerships and Health Professions Education Initiative. Acad Med 1998;73:S13-S15.
7. Bland CJ, Starnaman SM, Harris D, Henry R, Hembroff L. "No fear" curricular change: monitoring curricular change in the W.K. Kellogg Foundation's National Initiative on Community Partnerships and Health Professions Education. Acad Med 2000;75:623-33.
8. Scotti MJ. The Interdisciplinary Generalist Curriculum Project. Acad Med 2001;76:S1-S2.
9. Bland CJ, Starnaman SM, Wersal L, Moorhead-Rosenberg L, Zonia S, Henry R. Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed. Acad Med 2000;75:575-94.
10. Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Ausiello J, Wyatt S, Blumenthal D. Understanding the relationship between market competition and students' ratings of the managed care content of their undergraduate medical education. Acad Med 2001;76:51-9.
11. Medical School Objectives Project. Learning objectives for medical student education. Guidelines for medical schools: Report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med 1999;74:13-8.
12. Friedman CP, Corn M, Frisse M, et al. Contemporary issues in medicine-medical informatics and population health: Report II of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med 1999;74:130-41.
13. Christakis NA. The similarity and frequency of proposals to reform US medical education: constant concerns. JAMA 1995;274:706-11.
14. Enarson C, Burg FD. An overview of reform initiatives in medical education. 1906 through 1992. [Review]. JAMA 1992;268:1141-3.
15. Jones RF, Korn D. On the cost of educating a medical student. Acad Med 1997;72:200-10.