The Shark HoxN Cluster Is Homologous to the Human HoxD Cluster

Journal of Molecular Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 212-217

  Prohaska, Sonja J ^a,b   Fried, Claudia ^a,b   Amemiya, Chris T ^c   Ruddle, Frank H ^d   Wagner, Günter P ^d   Stadler, Peter F ^a,b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c BENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Hox clusters; Phylogenetic footprints

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; PROTEIN HOXA; PROTEIN HOXC; PROTEIN HOXD; PROTEIN HOXM; PROTEIN HOXN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; EVOLUTIONARY HOMOLOGY; GENE CLUSTER; GENE ISOLATION; GENE SEQUENCE; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SHARK; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, HOMEOBOX; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SHARKS;

CHONDRICHTHYES; HETERODONTUS FRANCISCI; MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0842334025     PISSN: 00222844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00239-003-2545-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403-410
2. Amores A, Force A, Yan YL, et al. (1998) Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282:1711-1714
3. Aparicio S, Chapman J, Stupka E, et al. (2002) Whole-genome shotgun assembly and analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes. Science 297:1301-1310
4. Bailey WJ, Kim J, Wagner G, Ruddle FH (1997) Phylogenetic reconstruction of vertebrate Hox cluster duplications. Mol Biol Evol 14:843-853
5. Bandelt HJ, Dress AWM (1992) A canonical decomposition theory for metrics on a finite set. Adv Math 92:47
6. Bandelt HJ, Dress AWM (1993) A relational approach to split decomposition. In: Opitz O. Lausen B. Klar R (eds) Information and classification. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 123-131
7. Buneman P (1971) The recovery of trees from measures of dissimilarity. In: Hodson FR, Kendall DG, Tauto P (eds) Mathematics and the archeological and historical sciences. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK, pp 387-395
8. Chiu Ch, Amemiya C, Dewar K, Kim CB, Ruddle FH, Wagner GP (2002) Molecular evolution of the HoxA cluster in the three major gnathostome lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:5492-5497
9. DOE Joint Genome Institute (2002) Fugu genome database. version 2.0: http://genome.jgi-psf.org/fugu3/fugu3.home.html; version 3.0: http://genome.jgi-psf.org/fugu6/fugu6.home.html
10. Duret L, Bucher P (1997) Searching for regulatory elements in human noncoding sequences. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7:399-406
11. Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP - Phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164-166
12. Garcia-Fernández J, Holland PW (1994) Archetypal organization of the amphioxus hox gene cluster. Nature 370:563-566
13. Holland PW Garcia-Fernández J (1999) Hox genes and chordate evolution. Dev Biol 173:382-395
14. Holland PWH, Garcia-Fernández J, Williams NA, Sidow A (1994) Gene duplication and the origins of vertebrate development. Development (Suppl):125-133
15. Huson DH (1998) Splitstree: Analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14:68-73
16. Kappen C. Schughart K, Ruddle FJH (1989) Two steps in the evolution of antennapedia-class vertebrate homeobox genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:5459-5463
17. Kim CB, Amemiya C, Bailey W, Kawasaki K, Mezey J, Miller W, Minosima S, Shimizu N, Wagner GP, Ruddle F (2000) Hox cluster genomics in the horn shark, Heterodontus francisci Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97:1655-1660
18. Maddison DR, Maddison WP (2000) MacClade 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA (e-book and computer program)
19. Málaga-Trillo E, Meyer A (2001) Genome duplications and accelerated evolution of Hox genes and cluster architecture in teleost fishes. Am Zool 41:6767-686
20. McGinnis W, Krumlauf R (1992) Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68:283-302
21. Morgenstern B (1999) DIALIGN 2: Improvement of the segment-to-segment approach to multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 15:211-218
22. Prohaska S, Fried C, Flamm C, Wagner G, Stadler PF (2003) Surveying phylogenetic footprints, in large gene clusters: Applications to Hox cluster duplications. Mol Phylog Evol (in press)
23. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406-425
24. Semple C, Steel M (2003) Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
25. Sumiyama K, Kim C, Ruddle FH (2001) An efficient cis-element discovery method using multiple sequence comparisons based on evolutionary relationships. Genomics 71:260-262
26. Tagle DA, Koop BF, Goodman M, Slightom JL, Hess DL, Jones RT (1988) Embryonic epsilon and gamma globin genes of a prosimian primate (galago crassicaudatus). Nucleotide and amino acid sequences, developmental regulation and phylogenetic footprints. J Mol Biol 203:439-455
27. Thompson JD, Higgs DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTALW: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties, and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673-4680