Identification of specific amino acid residues in the E. coli β processivity clamp involved in interactions with DNA polymerase III, UmuD and UmuD′

DNA Repair

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 301-312

  Duzen, Jill M ^a   Walker, Graham C ^b   Sutton, Mark D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA polymerase management; DNA replication; dnaN; Translesion DNA synthesis; umuDC; sliding clamp

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; GENE PRODUCT; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; PROTEIN UMUD; PROTEIN UMUD'; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CATALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SYNTHESIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTE; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTA;

EID: 0842281648     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2003.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Friedberg E.C., Feaver W.J., Gerlach V.L. The many faces of DNA polymerases: strategies for mutagenesis and for mutational avoidance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:2000;5681-5683.
2. Friedberg E.C., Wagner R., Radman M. Specialized DNA polymerases, cell survival, and the genesis of mutations. Science. 296:2002;1627-1630.
3. Sutton M.D., Walker G.C. Managing DNA polymerases: coordinating DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8342-8349.
4. G.C. Walker, B.T. Smith, M.D. Sutton, The SOS response to DNA damage, in: G. Stroz, R. Hengge-Aronis (Eds.), Bacterial Stress Responses, ASM Press, Washington, DC, 2000 (Chapter 9) pp. 131-144.
5. Sutton M.D., Narumi I., Walker G.C. Post-translational modification of the umuD-encoded subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V regulates its interactions with the beta processivity clamp. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2002;5307-5312.
6. M.D. Sutton, B.T. Smith, V.G. Godoy, G.C. Walker, The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent DNA damage tolerance, Ann. Rev. Gen. (2000) 479-497.
7. Sutton M.D., Opperman T., Walker G.C. The Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins UmuD and UmuD′ interact physically with the replicative DNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:1999;12373-12378.
8. E.C. Friedberg, G.C. Walker, W. Siede, DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, ASM Press, Washington, DC, 1995.
9. VanLoock M.S., Yu X., Yang S., Galkin V.E., Huang H., Rajan S.S., Anderson W.F., Stohl E.A., Seifert H.S., Egelman E.H. Complexes of RecA with LexA and RecX differentiate between active and inactive RecA nucleoprotein filaments. J. Mol. Biol. 333:2003;345-354.
10. Kowalczykowski S.C., Dixon D.A., Eggleston A.K., Lauder S.D., Rehrauer W.M. Biochemistry of homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev. 58:1994;401-465.
11. Lusetti S.L., Cox M.M. The bacterial RecA protein and the recombinational DNA repair of stalled replication forks. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71:2002;71-100.
12. Little J.W., Edmiston S.H., Pacelli L.Z., Mount D.W. Cleavage of the Escherichia coli lexA protein by the recA protease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:1980;3225-3229.
13. Little J.W., Mount D.W., Yanisch-Perron C.R. Purified lexA protein is a repressor of the recA and lexA genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:1981;4199-4203.
14. Little J.W., Mount D.W. The SOS regulatory system of Escherichia coli. Cell. 29:1982;11-22.
15. Little J.W. The SOS regulatory system: control of its state by the level of RecA protease. J. Mol. Biol. 167:1983;791-808.
16. Neher S.B., Flynn J.M., Sauer R.T., Baker T.A. Latent ClpX-recognition signals ensure LexA destruction after DNA damage. Genes Dev. 17:2003;1084-1089.
17. Courcelle J., Khodursky A., Peter B., Brown P.O., Hanawalt P.C. Comparative gene expression profiles following UV exposure in wild-type and SOS-deficient Escherichia coli. Genetics. 158:2001;41-64.
18. Khil P.P., Camerini-Otero R.D. Over 1000 genes are involved in the DNA damage response of Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 44:2002;89-105.
19. Nohmi T., Battista J.R., Dodson L.A., Walker G.C. RecA-mediated cleavage activates UmuD for mutagenesis: mechanistic relationship between transcriptional derepression and post-translational activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:1988;1816-1820.
20. Shinagawa H., Iwasaki H., Kato T., Nakata A. RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:1988;1806-1810.
21. Burckhardt S.E., Woodgate R., Scheuermann R.H., Echols H. UmuD mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: overproduction, purification, and cleavage by RecA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:1988;1811-1815.
22. Opperman T., Murli S., Smith B.T., Walker G.C. A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:1999;9218-9223.
23. 2′C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:1999;8919-8924.
24. 2′C mutagenic complex and RecA protein Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95:1998;9755-9760.
25. Reuven N.B., Arad G., Maor-Shoshani A., Livneh Z. The mutagenesis protein UmuC is a DNA polymerase activated by UmuD′, RecA, and SSB and is specialized for translesion replication. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1999;31763-31766.
26. Reuven N.B., Tomer G., Livneh Z. The mutagenesis proteins UmuD′ and UmuC prevent lethal frameshifts while increasing base substitution mutations. Mol. Cell. 2:1998;191-199.
27. Rangarajan S., Woodgate R., Goodman M.F. A phenotype for enigmatic DNA polymerase II: a pivotal role for pol II in replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96:1999;9224-9229.
28. Ranjarajan S., Woodgate R., Goodman M.F. Replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli involving pols II, III, V, PriA and RecFOR proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 43:2002;617-628.
29. 2′C ) EMBO J. 20:2001;4287-4298.
30. 2 protein. DNA Rep. 1:2002;77-93.
31. Sutton M.D., Murli S., Opperman T., Klein C., Walker G.C. umuDC-dnaQ interaction and its implications for cell cycle regulation and SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 183:2001;1085-1089.
32. Sutton M.D., Farrow M.F., Burton B.M., Walker G.C. Genetic interactions between the Escherichia coli umuDC gene products and the beta processivity clamp of the replicative DNA polymerase. J. Bacteriol. 183:2001;2897-2909.
33. Maor-Shoshani A., Reuven N.B., Tomer G., Livneh Z. Highly mutagenic replication by DNA polymerase V (UmuC) provides a mechanistic basis for SOS untargeted mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:2000;565-570.
34. Maor-Shoshani A., Livneh Z. Analysis of the stimulation of DNA polymerase V of Escherichia coli by processivity proteins. Biochemistry. 41:2002;14438-14446.
35. Foster P.L., Sullivan A.D. Interactions between epsilon, the proofreading subunit of DNA polymerase III, and proteins involved in the SOS response of Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 214:1988;467-473.
36. Foster P.L., Sullivan A.D., Franklin S.B. Presence of the dnaQ-rnh divergent transcriptional unit on a multicopy plasmid inhibits induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 171:1989;3144-3151.
37. Jonczyk P., Fijalkowska I., Ciesla Z. Overproduction of the epsilon subunit of DNA polymerase III counteracts the SOS mutagenic response of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85:1988;9124-9127.
38. Jonczyk P., Nowicka A. Specific in vivo protein-protein interactions between Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins. J. Bacteriol. 178:1996;2580-2585.
39. Tadmor Y., Ascarelli-Goell R., Skaliter R., Livneh Z. Overproduction of the beta subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme reduces UV mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 174:1992;2517-2524.
40. Dalrymple B.P., Kongsuwan K., Wijffels G., Dixon N.E., Jennings P.A. A universal protein-protein interaction motif in the eubacterial DNA replication and repair systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;11627-11632.
41. Jeruzalmi D., Yurieva O., Zhao Y., Young M., Stewart J., Hingorani M., O'Donnell M., Kuriyan J. Mechanism of processivity clamp opening by the delta subunit wrench of the clamp loader complex of E. coli DNA polymerase III. Cell. 106:2001;417-428.
42. Becherel O.J., Fuchs R.P., Wagner J. Pivotal role of the beta-clamp in translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in E. coli cells. DNA Rep. 1:2002;703-708.
43. Pham P., Bertram J.G., O'Donnell M., Woodgate R., Goodman M.F. A model for SOS-lesion-targeted mutations in Escherichia coli. Nature. 409:2001;366-370.
44. Turner J., Hingorani M.M., Kelman Z., O'Donnell M. The internal workings of a DNA polymerase clamp-loading machine. EMBO J. 18:1999;771-783.
45. Ferentz A.E., Opperman T., Walker G.C., Wagner G. Dimerization of the UmuD′ protein in solution and its implications for regulation of SOS mutagenesis. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4:1997;979-983.
46. Kim D.R., McHenry C.S. Identification of the beta-binding domain of the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli polymerase III holoenzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1996;20699-20704.
47. 2C complex involved in a DNA damage checkpoint control. J. Bacteriol. 183:2001;1215-1224.
48. Lee M.H., Ohta T., Walker G.C. A monocysteine approach for probing the structure and interactions of the UmuD protein. J. Bacteriol. 176:1994;4825-4837.
49. S.S. Wong, Chemistry of Protein Conjugation and Cross-Linking, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993.
50. Battista J.R., Ohta T., Nohmi T., Sun W., Walker G.C. Dominant negative umuD mutations decreasing RecA-mediated cleavage suggest roles for intact UmuD in modulation of SOS mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87:1990;7190-7194.
51. Griep M.A., McHenry C.S. Dissociation of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme beta 2 subunits is accompanied by conformational change at distal cysteines 333. J. Biol. Chem. 265:1990;20356-20363.
52. Kong X.P., Onrust R., O'Donnell M., Kuriyan J. Three-dimensional structure of the beta subunit of E. coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: a sliding DNA clamp. Cell. 69:1992;425-437.
53. G.T. Hermanson Bioconjugate Techniques, Academic Press, 1997.
54. Naktinis V., Turner J., O'Donnell M. A molecular switch in a replication machine defined by an internal competition for protein rings. Cell. 84:1996;137-145.
55. Dionne I., Nookala R.K., Jackson S.P., Doherty A.J., Bell S.D. A heterotrimeric PCNA in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Mol. Cell. 11:2003;275-282.
56. Kelman Z., Yuzhakov A., Andjelkovic J., O'Donnell M. Devoted to the lagging strand-the subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme contacts SSB to promote processive elongation and sliding clamp assembly. EMBO J. 17:1998;2436-2449.
57. Glover B.P., McHenry C.S. The chi psi subunits of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme bind to single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) and facilitate replication of an SSB-coated template. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1998;23476-23484.
58. Frank E.G., Hauser J., Levine A.S., Woodgate R. Targeting of the UmuD, UmuD′, and MucA′ mutagenesis proteins to DNA by RecA protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90:1993;8169-8173.
59. Freitag N., McEntee K. "Activated"-RecA protein affinity chromatography of LexA repressor and other SOS-regulated proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86:1989;8363-8367.
60. Khidhir M.A., Casaregola S., Holland I.B. Mechanism of transient inhibition of DNA synthesis in ultraviolet- irradiated E. coli: inhibition is independent of recA whilst recovery requires RecA protein itself and an additional, inducible SOS function. Mol. Gen. Genet. 199:1985;133-140.
61. Lopez de Saro F.J., O'Donnell M. Interaction of the beta sliding clamp with MutS, ligase, and DNA polymerase I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;8376-8380.
62. Bonner C.A., Stukenberg P.T., Rajagopalan M., Eritja R., O'Donnell M., McEntee K., Echols H., Goodman M.F. Processive DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase II mediated by DNA polymerase III accessory proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 267:1992;11431-11438.
63. Lenne-Samuel N., Wagner J., Etienne H., Fuchs R.P. The processivity factor beta controls DNA polymerase IV traffic during spontaneous mutagenesis and translesion synthesis in vivo. EMBO Rep. 3:2002;45-49.
64. Tsurimoto T. PCNA binding proteins. Front. Biosci. 4:1999;D849-D858.
65. Stelter P., Ulrich H.D. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature. 425:2003;188-191.
66. Bunting K.A., Roe S.M., Pearl L.H. Structural basis for recruitment of translesion DNA polymerase Pol IV/DinB to the beta clamp. EMBO J. 22:2003;5883-5892.