Potential Geographic Distribution of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in North America

American Midland Naturalist

Volumn 151, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 170-178

  Peterson, A Townsend ^a   Scachetti Pereira, R ^b   Hargrove, W W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Ctro Referencia Informacao A   (Brazil)

^c OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DAMAGE; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION;

NORTH AMERICA;

ANOPLOPHORA; ANOPLOPHORA GLABRIPENNIS; CERAMBYCIDAE; COLEOPTERA; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 0842269875     PISSN: 00030031     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2004)151[0170:pgdoag]2.0.co;2     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ANONYMOUS. 2003. Asian Longhorned Beetle. http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/ alb/maps/riskmap.htm; access date 23 July 2003.
2. APHIS. 2003. Introductions and Warehouse Detections of Longhorned Beetles from Cargo Originating in China. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/ alb/albmap.html; access date 23 July 2003.
3. BANCROFT, J. S., M. T. SMITH, E. K. CHAPUT AND J. TROPP. 2002. Rapid test of the suitability of host-trees and the effects of larval history on Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 75:308-316.
4. CARLTON, J. T. 1996. Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biological Conservation, 78:97-106.
5. CAVEY, J. F., E. R. HOEBEKE, S. PASSOA AND S. W. LINGAFELTER. 1998. A new exotic threat to North American hardwood forests: An Asian longhorned beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera : Cerambycidae). I. Larval description and diagnosis. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 100:373-381.
6. CLARK, J. S., M. LEWIS AND L. HORVATH. 2001. Invasion by extremes: Population spread with variation in dispersal and reproduction. American Naturalist, 157:537-554.
7. ESRI. 1997. ArcAtlas. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California.
8. FERIA, T. P. AND A. T. PETERSON. 2002. Using point occurrence data and inferential algorithms to predict local communities of birds. Diversity and Distributions, 8:49-56.
9. GRINNELL, J. 1917. Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. American Naturalist, 51:115-128.
10. HARGROVE, W. W., R. H. GARDNER, M. G. TURNER, W. H. ROMME AND D. G. DESPAIN. 2000. Simulating fire patterns in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecological Modelling, 135:243-263.
11. HIGGINS, S. I., D. M. RICHARDSON, R. M. COWLING AND T. H. TRINDER-SMITH. 1999. Predicting the landscape-scale distribution of alien plants and their threat to plant diversity. Conservation Biology, 13:303-313.
12. HOFFMANN, M. H. 2001. The distribution of Senecio vulgaris: capacity of climatic range models for predicting adventitious ranges. Flora, 196/5:395-403.
13. HONIG, M. A., R. M. COWLING AND D. M. RICHARDSON. 1992. The invasive potential of Australian banksias in South-African fynbos - a comparison of the reproductive potential of Banksia ericifolia and Leucadendron laureolum. Australian Journal of Ecology, 17:305-314.
14. KAREIVA, P. 1996. Developing a predictive ecology for non-indigenous species and ecological invasions. Ecology, 77:1651-1652.
15. KEENA, M. A. 2002. Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) fecundity and longevity under laboratory conditions: Comparison of populations from New York and Illinois on Acer saccharum. Environmental Entomology, 31:490-498.
16. LAWTON, J. H. AND K. C. BROWN. 1986. The population and community ecology of invading insects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 314:607-617.
17. MACARTHUR, R. 1972. Geographical Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
18. MACLEOD, A., H. F. EVANS AND R. H. A. BAKER. 2002. An analysis of pest risk from an Asian longhorn beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) to hardwood trees in the European community. Crop Protection, 21:635-645.
19. MARTIN, T. E. 2001. Abiotic vs. biotic influences on habitat selection of coexisting species: Climate change impacts? Ecology, 82:175-188.
20. MARTIN, W. K. 1996. The current and potential distribution of the common myna (Acridotheres tristis) in Australia. Emu, 96:166-173.
21. NAS. 2002. Predicting invasions of nonindigenous plants and plant pests. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
22. NOWAK, D. J., J. E. PASEK, R. A. SEQUEIRA, D. E. CRANE AND V. C. MASTRO. 2001. Potential effect of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on urban trees in the United States. Journal of Economic Entomology, 94:116-122.
23. PANETTA, F. D. AND J. DODD. 1987. Bioclimatic prediction of the potential distribution of skeleton weed Chondrilla juncea L. in Western Australia. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 53:11-16.
24. PAPES, M. AND A. T. PETERSON. 2003. Predictions of the geographic course of the invasion of Ageratina adenophora in China. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research.
25. PETERSON, A. T., J. SOBERON AND V. SANCHEZ-CORDERO. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science, 285:1265-1267.
26. _. 2001. Predicting species' geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor, 103:599-605.
27. _. AND D. A. VIEGLAIS. 2001. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling. BioScience, 51:363-371.
28. _, L. G. BALL AND K. C. COHOON. 2002a. Predicting distributions of tropical birds. Ibis, 144:e27-e32.
29. _, D. R. B. STOCKWELL AND D. A. KLUZA. 2002b. Distributional prediction based on ecological niche modeling of primary occurrence data, p. 617-623. In: J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund and M. L. Morrison (eds.). Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
30. _ AND D. A. KLUZA. 2003. New distributional modeling approaches for Gap Analysis. Animal Conservation, 6:47-54
31. _, M. PAPES AND D. A. KLUZA. 2003. Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America. Weed Science.
32. _ AND C. R. ROBINS. 2003. When endangered meets invasive: Ecological niche modeling predicts double trouble for spotted owls, Strix occidentalis. Conservation Biology.
33. _, R. SCACHETTI-PEREIRA AND D. A. KLUZA. 2003. Assessment of invasive potential of the glassy-winged sharpshooter Homalodisca coagulata in California and South America. Biota Neotropica.
34. PODGER, F. D., D. C. MUMMERY, C. R. PALZER AND M. J. BROWN. 1990. Bioclimatic analysis of the distribution of damage to native plants in Tasmania by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Australian Journal of Ecology, 15:281-290.
35. REICHARD, S. H. AND C. W. HAMILTON. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology, 11:193-203.
36. RICHARDSON, D. M. AND J. P. MCMAHON. 1992. A bioclimatic analysis of Eucalyptus nintens to identify potential planting regions in Southern Africa. South African Journal of Science, 88:380-387.
37. SCACHETTI-PEREIRA, R. 2001. Desktop GARP. http://www.lifemapper.org/ desktopgarp/; access date 23 July 2003.
38. SCOTT, J. K. AND F. D. PANETTA. 1993. Predicting the Australian weed status of southern African plants. Journal of Biogeography, 20:87-93.
39. SINDEL, B. M. AND P. W. MICHAEL. 1992. Spread and potential distribution of Senecio madagascariensis pior (Fireweed) in Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology, 17:21-26.
40. SKOV, F. 2000. Potential plant distribution mapping based on climatic similarity. Taxon, 49:503-515.
41. SMITH, M. T., J. BANCROFT, G. H. LI, R. GAO AND S. TEALE. 2001. Dispersal of Anoplophora glabripennis (Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology, 30:1036-1040.
42. _ AND J. TROPP. 2002. Age-specific fecundity of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on three tree species infested in the United States. Environmental Entomology, 31:76-83.
43. STOCKWELL, D. R. B. AND I. R. NOBLE. 1992. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: A robust and informative method of analysis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 33:385-390.
44. _. 1999. Genetic algorithms II, p. 123-144. In: A. H. Fielding (ed.). Machine learning methods for ecological applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
45. _ AND D. P. PETERS. 1999. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. International Journal of Geographic INformation Systems, 13:143-158.
46. _ AND A. T. PETERSON. 2002. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecological Modelling, 148:1-13.
47. SUTHERST, R. W., G. F. MAYWALD, T YONOW AND P. M. STEVENS. 1999. CLIMEX User Guide - predicting the effects of climate on plants and animals. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
48. WELK, E., K. SCHUBERT AND M. H. HOFFMANN. 2002. Present and potential distribution of invasive garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in North America. Diversity and Distributions, 8:219-233.
49. ZALBA, S. M., M. I. SONAGLIONI AND C. J. BELENGUER. 2000. Using a habitat model to assess the risk of invasion by an exotic plant. Biological Conservation, 93:203-208.