New distributional modelling approaches for gap analysis

Animal Conservation

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 47-54

  Peterson, A Townsend ^a   Kluza, Daniel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; ERROR ANALYSIS; GAP DYNAMICS; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 0346747590     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S136794300300307X     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, R. P., Laverde, M. & Peterson, A. T. (2002a). Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models. Glob. Ecol. and Biogeog. 11 131-141.
2. Anderson, R. P., Laverde, M. & Peterson, A. T. (2002b). Using niche-based GIS modelling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice. Oikos 93: 3-16.
3. Anderson, R. P., Lew, D. & Peterson, A. T. (In press). Using intermodel variation in error components to select best subsets of ecological niche models. Ecol. Modell.
4. Austin, M. P., Nicholls, A. O. & Margules, C. R. (1990). Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species. Ecol. Monogr. 60: 161-177.
5. Boone, R. B. & Krohn, W. B. (1998). Maine Gap Analysis vertebrate data, Part II: Distribution, habitat relations, and status of breeding birds in Maine. Orono, ME: Maine Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Maine.
6. Csuti, B. (1996). Mapping animal distribution areas for gap analysis. In Gap analysis: a landscape approach to biodiversity planning: 135-145. Scott, J. M., Tear, T. H. & Davis, F. W. (Eds). Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
7. DeGraaf, R. M., Yamasaki, M., Leak, W. B. & Lanier, J. W. (1992). New England wildlife: management of forested habitats. General Technical Report NE-144. Radnor, PA: US Department of Agriculture.
8. Feria, T. P. & Peterson, A. T. (2002). Using point occurrence data and inferential algorithms to predict local communities of birds. Divers. and Distrib. 8: 49-56.
9. Fielding, A. H. & Bell, J. F. (1997). A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24: 38-49.
10. Grinnell, J. (1917). Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. Am. Nat. 51: 115-128.
11. Grinnell, J. (1924). Geography and evolution. Ecology 5: 225-229.
12. Hutchinson, G. E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Sym. Quant. Biol. 22: 415-427.
13. Krohn, W. B. (1996). Predicted vertebrate distributions from gap analysis: considerations in the designs of statewide accuracy assessments. In Gap analysis: a landscape approach to biodiversity planning: 147-162. Scott, J. M., Tear, T. H. & Davis, F. W. (Eds). Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
14. Krohn, W. B., Boone, R. B., Sader, S. A., Hepinstall, J. A., Schaefer, S. M. & Painton, S. L. (1998). Maine Gap Analysis: a geographic analysis of biodiversity. Moscow, ID: US Biological Resources Division, Gap Analysis Program.
15. Nichols, J. D., Boulinier, T., Hines, J. E., Pollack, K. H. & Sauer, J. H. (1998). Inference models for spatial variation in species richness and community composition when not all species are detected. Conserv. Biol. 12: 1390-1398.
16. Nix, H. A. (1986). A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes. In Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia: 4-15. Longmore, R. (Ed.). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
17. Peterson, A. T. (2001). Predicting species' geographic distributions based on ecological niche modelling. Condor 103: 599-605.
18. Peterson, A. T., Ball, L. G. & Cohoon, K. C. (2002a). Predicting distributions of tropical birds. Ibis 144: e27-e32.
19. Peterson, A. T. & Cohoon, K. C. (1999). Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic data completeness. Ecol. Model. 117: 159-164.
20. Peterson, A. T., Navarro-Siguenza, A. G. & Benitez-Diaz, H. (1998). The need for continued scientific collecting: a geographic analysis of Mexican bird specimens. Ibis 140: 288-294.
21. Peterson, A. T., Ortega-Huerta, M. A., Bartley, J., Sanchez-Cordero, V., Soberon, J., Buddemeier, R. H. & Stockwell, D. R. B. (2002b). Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature 416: 626-629.
22. Peterson, A. T. & Robins, C. R. (In press). When endangered meets invasive: ecological niche modelling predicts double trouble for spotted owls, Strix occidentalis. Conserv. Biol.
23. Peterson, A. T., Sanchez-Cordero, V., Beard, C. B. & Ramsey, J. M. (2002c). Ecologic niche modelling and potential reservoirs for Chagas disease, Mexico. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8: 662-667.
24. Peterson, A. T., Sanchez-Cordero, V., Soberon, J., Bartley, J., Buddemeier, R. H. & Navarro-Siguenza, A. G. (2001). Effects of global climate change on geographic distributions of Mexican Cracidae. Ecol. Model. 144: 21-30.
25. Peterson, A. T., Soberon, J. & Sanchez-Cordero, V. (1999). Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285: 1265-1267.
26. Peterson, A. T., Stockwell, D. R. B. & Kluza, D. A. (2002d). Distributional prediction based on ecological niche modelling of primary occurrence data. In Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy: 617-623. Scott, J. M. (Ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.
27. Peterson, A. T. & Vieglais, D. A. (2001). Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modelling. BioScience 51: 363-371.
28. Scott, J. M., Davis, F., Csuti, B., Noss, R., Butterfield, B., Groves, C., Anderson, H., Caicco, S. L., D'Ericha, F., Edwards, T. C. Jr., Ullman, J. & Wright, R. G. (1993). Gap analysis: a geographic approach to the protection of biological diversity. Wildl. Monogr. 23 1-41.
29. Scott, J. M., Heglund, P. J. & Morrison, M. L. (Eds). (2002). Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Washington, DC: Island Press.
30. Scott, J. M., Tear, T. H. & Davis, F. W. (Eds). (1996). Gap analysis: a landscape approach to biodiversity planning. Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
31. Stockwell, D. R. B. (1999). Genetic algorithms II. In Machine learning methods for ecological applications: 123-144. Fielding, A. H. (Ed.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32. Stockwell, D. R. B. & Noble, I. R. (1992). Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of analysis. Maths. Comput. in Simul. 33: 385-390.
33. Stockwell, D. R. B. & Peters, D. P. (1999). The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int. J. of Geog. Inf. Syst. 13: 143-158.
34. Stockwell, D. R. B. & Peterson, A. T. (2002a). Controlling bias in biodiversity data. In Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy: 537-546. Scott, J. M. (Ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.
35. Stockwell, D. R. B. & Peterson, A. T. (2002b). Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 148: 1-13.
36. Walker, P. A. & Cocks, K. D. (1991). HABITAT: a procedure for modelling a disjoint environmental envelope for a plant or animal species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeog. Lett. 1: 108-118.