Potential plant distribution mapping based on climatic similarity

Taxon

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 503-515

  Skov, Flemming ^a  

^a Kalø   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Arecaceae; Climatic envelope; Distribution mapping; Ecuador; GIS; Spatial modelling

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; VEGETATION MAPPING;

EID: 0033849680     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1224346     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Austin, M. P. & Meyers, J. A. 1996. Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: implication for management of forest biodiversity. Forest. Ecol. Manag. 85: 95-106.
2. Baker, W. L. & Weisberg, P. J. 1997. Using GIS to model tree population parameters in the Rocky Mountain National Park forest-tundra ecotone. J. Biogeogr. 24: 513-526.
3. Beerling, D. J., Huntley, B. & Bailey, J. P. 1995. Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica; use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfaces. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 269-282.
4. Bjerrum, M. 2000. Importance of environment and history in modelling the distribution of Begonia in Ecuador. Master Thesis, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
5. Borchsenius, F. & Skov, F. 1999. Conservation status of Ecuadorian palms. Acta. Bot. Venez. 22: 221-236.
6. _ , Borgtoft Pedersen, H. & Balslev, H. 1998. Manual to the palms of Ecuador. AAU Reports 27. Aarhus.
7. Box, E. O. 1981a. Macroclimate and plant forms: an introduction to predictive modelling in phytogeography. The Hague.
8. Box, E. O. 1981b. Predicting physiognomic vegetation types with climate variables. Vegetatio 45: 127-139.
9. _ , Crumpacker, D. W. & Hardin, E. D. 1993. A climatic model for location of plant species in Florida, U.S.A. J. Biogeogr. 20: 629-644.
10. _ , _ & _ 1999. Predicted effects climatic change on distribution of ecologically important native tree and shrub species in Florida. Climatic Change 41: 213-248.
11. Breininger, D. R., Larson, V. L., Duncan, B. W., Smith, R. B., Oddy, D. M. & Goodchild, M. F. 1995. Landscape patterns of Florida Scrub Jay habitat use and demographic success. Conservation Biol. 9: 1442-1453.
12. Carpenter, G., Gillison, A. N. & Winter, J. 1993. DOMAIN: a flexible modelling procedure for mapping potential distributions of plants and animals. Biodiversity Conservation 2: 667-680.
13. DeMers, M. N. 1997. Fundamentals of Geographic Information Systems, ed. 2. New York.
14. Duncan, B. W., Breininger, D. R., Schmalzer, P. A. & Larson, V. L. 1995. Validating a Florida Scrub Jay habitat suitability model, using demography data on Kennedy Space Center. Photogramm. Engin. Remote Sensing 61: 1361-1370.
15. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.). 1996. Using ArcView. Redlands.
16. Franklin, J. 1995. Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progr. Phys. Geog. 19: 474-499.
17. Gower, J. C. 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27: 857-871.
18. Guisan, A., Theurillat, J. P. & Kienast, F. 1998. Predicting the potential distribution of plant species in an alpine environment. J. Veg. Sci. 9: 65-74.
19. Haber, E. 1993. Desktop computer mapping at the National Herbarium of Canada. Taxon 42: 63-70.
20. Henderson, A. 1995. The palms of the Amazon. New York.
21. Holdridge, L. R. 1967. Life zone ecology. San José.
22. Hughes, L., Cawsey, E. M. & Westoby, M. 1996. Climatic range sizes of Eucalyptus species in relation to future climate change. Global. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 5: 23-29.
23. Huntley, B., Berry, P. M., Cramer, W. & McDonald, A. P. 1995. Modelling present and potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate response surfaces. J. Biogeogr. 22: 967-1001.
24. Iverson, L. R. & Prasad, A. M. 1998. Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern United States. Ecol. Monogr. 68: 465-485.
25. _ , _ & Schwartz, M. W. 1999. Modeling potential future individual tree-species distributions in the eastern United States under a climate change scenario: a case study with Pinus virginiana. Ecol. Model. 115: 77-93.
26. Jennings, M. D. 2000. Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecol. 15: 5-20.
27. Jensen, J. R., Narumalani, S., Weatherbee, O., Morris, K. S. & Mackey, H. E. 1992. Predictive modeling of Cattail and Waterlily distribution in a South Carolina reservoir using GIS. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S. 58: 1561-1568.
28. Kienast, F., Wildi, O. & Brzeziecki, B. 1998. Potential impacts of climate change on species richness in mountain forests - an ecological risk assessment. Biol. Conservation 83: 291-305.
29. Leathwick, J. R. 1995. Climatic relationships of some New Zealand forest tree species. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 237-248.
30. _ , Whitehead, D. & McLeod, M. 1996. Predicting changes in the composition of New Zealand's indigenous forests in response to global warming: a modelling approach. Environm. Model. Softw. 11: 81-90.
31. Lenihan, J. M. 1993. Ecological response-surface for North-American boreal tree species and their use in forest classification. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 667-680.
32. Lugo, A. E., Brown, S. L., Dodson, R., Smith, T. S. & Shugart, H. H. 1999. The Holdridge life zones of the conterminous United States in relation to ecosystem mapping. J. Biogeogr. 26: 1025-1038.
33. Mitchell, A. 1999. The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis. Volume I: Geographic patterns and relationships. Redlands.
34. Narumalani, S., Jensen, J. R., Althausen, J. D., Burkhalter, S. & Mackey, H. E. 1997. Aquatic macrophyte modeling using GIS and logistic multiple regression. Photogramm. Engin. Remote Sensing 63: 41-49.
35. Rhoads, A. F. & Thompson, L. 1992. Integrating herbarium data into a geographic information system: requirements for spatial analysis. Taxon 41: 43-49.
36. Skov, F. 1989. Hypertaxonomy - a new computer tool for revisional work. Taxon 38: 582-509.
37. -1999. Spatial modelling for tropical biodiversity assessment. Pp. 203-214 in: Stubkjær, E. & Hansen, H. S. (eds.), ScanGIS '99 - Proceedings from the 7th Scandinavian Research conference on Geographical Information Science. Aalborg.
38. _ & Borchsenius, F. 1997. Predicting plant species distribution patterns using simple climatic parameters: a case study of Ecuadorian palms. Ecography 20: 347-355.
39. Stott, P. 1981. Historical Plant Geography. London.
40. Sykes, M. T., Prentice, I., Colin, I. C. & Cramer, W. 1996. A bioclimatic model for the potential distributions of north European tree species under present and future climates. J. Biogeogr. 23: 203-233.
41. Tomlin, C. D. 1990. Geographic information systems and cartographic modeling. New Jersey.
42. Welzen, P. C. van. 1989. Software programs COOR and MAP. Taxon 38: 237.
43. Zimmermann, N. E. & Kienast, F. 1999. Predictive mapping of alpine grasslands in Switzerland: species versus community approach. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 469-482.