Establishing Normal Hearing with the Dichotic Multiple-frequency Auditory Steady-State Response Compared to an Auditory Brainstem Response Protocol

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 62-68

  Swanepoel, Dewet ^a   Schmulian, Dunay ^a   Hugo, René ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Ambient noise; Amplitude modulated tones; Auditory evoked response; Carrier frequency; Modulation frequency; Multiple stimulus technique; Tone burst

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIPLE FREQUENCY AUDITORY STEADY STATE RESPONSE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 0842265641     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480310015902     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Van der Reijden CS, Mens LHM, Snik FM. Comparing signal to noise ratios of amplitude modulation following responses from four EEG deprivations in awake normally hearing adults. Audiology 2001; 40: 202-7.
2. Hall III JW. Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1992.
3. Hood LJ. Clinical applications of the auditory brainstem response. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 1998.
4. Lins OG, Picton TW. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 420-32.
5. Lins OG, Picton TW, Boucher BL, et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 81-96.
6. Rickards FW, Tan LE, Cohen LT, Wilson OJ, Drew JH, Clark GM. Auditory steady state evoked potentials in newborns. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 327-37.
7. Lins OG, Picton PE, Picton TW, Champagne SC, Durieux-Smith A. Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3051-63.
8. Rance G, Dowell RC, Rickards FW, Beer DE, Clark GM. Steady state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click evoked auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 48-61.
9. Perez-Abalo MC, Savio G, Torres A, Martin V, Rodriguez E, Galan L. Steady state responses to multiple amplitude modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency specific thresholds in hearing impaired children and normal subjects. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 200-11.
10. Picton TW, Durieux-Smith A, Champagne S, et al. Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 315-31.
11. Collet L, Gallégo S, Durrant JD, Truy E. Electrically evoked multiple auditory steady-state responses recorded in digisonic cochlear-implanted patients. Proc 17th Biennial Symposium of the International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group, Vancouver, B.C., 22-27 July, 2001.
12. Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Furuse H, et al. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80 Hz amplitude modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1994; 504: 7-14.
13. Rance G, Rickards FW, Cohen LT, De Vidi S, Clark GM. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499-507.
14. Herdman AT, Stapells DR. Thresholds determined using monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 2001; 30: 41-9.
15. Dimitrijevic A, John MS, Van Roon P, et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 205-24.
16. Picton TW. Clinical usefulness of auditory evoked potentials: a critical evaluation. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1991; 15: 3-18.
17. Arnold SA. The auditory brain stem response. In: Roeser RJ, Valente M, Hosford-Dunn H, eds. Audiology diagnosis. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 2000: 451-70.
18. Bachmann KR, Hall JW. Pediatric auditory brainstem response assessment: the cross-check principle twenty years later. Semin Hear 1998; 19: 41-60.
19. ANSI. American national standard specification for audiometers, ANSI S3.6. New York: American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 1996.
20. ANSI. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms, ANSI S3.1. New York: American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 1999.
21. Sinninger, Cone-Wesson. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of clinical audiology, 5th edn. London: Williams & Wilkins, 1994: 3-5.
22. Gorga MP, Kaminski JR, Beauchaine KL, Bergman BM. A comparison of auditory brain stem response thresholds and latencies elicited by air-and bone-conducted stimuli. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 85-94.
23. Stapells D. Threshold estimation by the tone-evoked ABR: a literature meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 2000; 24: 74-83.
24. Aoyagi M, Yamazaki Y, Yokota M, et al. Frequency specificity of 80 Hz amplitude modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1996; 522: 6-10.
25. Kosmider D. The auditory brainstem response and the steady state evoked potential as predictors of the behavioural audiogram [unpublished master's thesis]. Melbourne, Vic.: Department of Otolaryngology, Audiology and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, 1997.
26. Gorga MP. Predicting auditory sensitivity from auditory brainstem response measurements. Semin Hear 1999; 20: 29-43.