Comparing signal to noise ratios of amplitude modulation following responses from four EEG derivations in awake normally hearing adults;Comparando tasas señal/ruido para modulación de amplitud en seguimiento a respuestas de cuatro derivaciones del EEG en adultos normo-oyentes despiertos

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 202-207

  van der Reijden, Christoph S ^a   Mens, Lucas H M ^a   Snik, Adf M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

(SSEP); Amplitude modulation following; EEG derivation; Electrode position; Hearing threshold; Noise; response (AMFR); Signal; Steady state evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SLEEP; TIME; WAKEFULNESS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; WAKEFULNESS;

EID: 0034874605     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206090109073115     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Regan D. Human brain electrophysio-logy: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1989; 34–43, 70-134,275-278
2. Aoyagi M, Yamazaki Y, Yokota M, et al. Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 522: 6–10, Suppl
3. Ranee G, Beer D E, Cone-Wesson B, et al. Clinical findings for a group of infants and young children with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hearing 1999; 20: 238–252
4. Stapells D R, Oates P. Estimation of pure tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol Neurootol 1997; 2: 257–280
5. John M S, Lins O G, Boucher B L, Picton T W. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 1998; 37: 59–82
6. Ranee G, Dowell R C, Rickards F W, Beer D E, Clark G M. Steady-state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brain stem response. Ear Hearing 1998; 19: 48–61
7. John M S, Picton T W. MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Computer Meth Programs Biomed 2000; 61: 125–150
8. Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by magnitude-squared coherence. Ear Hearing 1989; 10: 2–13
9. Fridman J, Zapulla R, Bergelson M, et al. Application of phase spectral analysis for brain stem auditory evoked potential detection in normal subjects and patients with posterior fossa tumors. Audiology 1984; 23: 99–113
10. Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Kim Y, Suzuki Y, Fuse T, Koike Y. Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res 1993; 65: 253–261
11. Levi E C, Folsom R C, Dobie R A. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age and state. Hear Res 1993; 68: 42–52
12. Ranee G, Rickards F W, Cohen L T, De Vidi S, Clark G M. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
13. Aoyagi M, Suzuki Y, Yokota M, Furuse H, Watanabe T, Ito T. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 28–37
14. Rickards F W, Tan L E, Cohen L T, Wilson O J, Drew J H, Clark G M. Auditory steady state evoked potential in newborns. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 327–337
15. Cohen L T, Rickards F W, Clark G M. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 2467–2479, J;
16. Lins O G, Picton P E, Picton T W. Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80–110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3051–3063
17. Lins O G, Picton T W, Boucher B L, et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 1796: 81–96
18. Valdez J L, Perez-Abalo M C, Martin V, Savio G, et al. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 420–429
19. Aoyagi M, Yamazaki Y, Yokota M, et al. Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 522: 6–10, Suppl