Emotion and Political Cognition: A Test of Bipolar, Two-Dimensional, and Discrete Models of Emotion in Predicting Involvement and Learning

Communication Monographs

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 250-263

  Hullett, Craig R ^a   Louden, Allan D ^b   Mitra, Ananda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742323935     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0363775032000167424     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Benoit, W. L., McKinney, M. S., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). Beyond learning and persona: Extending the scope of presidential debate effects. Communication Monographs, 68, 259-273.
2. Benoit, W. L., Webber, D. J., & Berman, J. (1998). Effects of presidential debate watching and ideology on attitudes and knowledge. Argumentation and Advocacy, 34, 163-172.
3. Bothwell, R., & Brigham, J. (1983). Selective evaluation and recall during the 1980 Reagan-Carter debate. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 427-442.
4. Breckler, S. (1993). Emotion and attitude change. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 462-473). New York: Guilford.
5. Cacioppo, J., & Gardner, W. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191-214.
6. Corcoran, K., & Fischer, J. (1987), Measures for clinical practice. New York: Free Press.
7. Dillard, J. P., & Meijnders, A. (2002). Persuasion and the structure of affect. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook (pp. 309-328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Drew, D., & Weaver, D. (1991). Voter learning in the 1988 presidential election: Did the debates and the media matter? Journalism Quarterly, 68, 27-38.
9. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
10. Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Green, D., Goldman, S., & Salovey, P. (1993). Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1029-1041.
12. Green, D., Salovey, P., & Truax, K. (1999). Static, dynamic, and causative bipolarity of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 856-867.
13. Harmon-Jones, E., & Sigelman, J. (2001). State anger and prefrontal brain activity: Evidence that insult-related relative left prefrontal activation is associated with experienced anger and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 797-803.
14. Holbrook, T. M. (1999). Political learning from presidential debates. Political Behavior, 21, 67-89.
15. Hullett, C. R., & Louden, A. (1998). Audience learning and perceptions of image and issue in a congressional debate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 34, 189-202.
16. Hunter, J., & Gerbing, D. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 267-320.
17. Jamieson, K. H., & Adasiewicz, C. (2000). What can voters learn from election debates? In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates: International perspectives (pp. 25-42). New York: St. Martin's Press.
18. Lanoue, D. J. (1991). The "Turning Point": Viewers' reactions to the second 1988 presidential debate. American Politics Quarterly, 19, 80-95.
19. Lanoue, D. J. (1992). One that made a difference: Cognitive consistency, political knowledge, and the 1980 presidential debate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 168-184.
20. Lazarus, R. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Marcus, G., & MacKuen, M. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87, 672-685.
22. Pfau, M. (1988). Intra-party political debate and issue learning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 16, 99-112.
23. Pfau, M. (2002). The subtle nature of presidential debate influence. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 251-261.
24. Racine Group. (2002). White paper on televised political campaign debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 199-218.
25. Russell, J., & Barrett, L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 805-819.
26. Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Rüssel, S., & Crane, R. S. (1983). Assessment of anger: The state-trait anger scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in Personality Assessment (pp. 159-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L. (1999). On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 10, 297-303.
28. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.
30. Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117-123.
31. Zhu, J., Milavsky, J. R., & Biswas, R. (1994). Do televised debates affect image perception more than issue knowledge? A study of the first 1992 presidential debate. Human Communication Research, 20, 302-333.