The Subtle Nature of Presidential Debate Influence

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 251-261

  Pfau, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742299717     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2002.11821571     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Abramowitz, A. I., (1978). The impact of a presidential debate on voter rationality. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 680–690.
2. Apker, J., & Voss, C. R. W., (1994). The student voter. In D. B., Carlin & M. S., McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 187–202). Westport, CT: Praeger.
3. Atkin, C., Hocking, J., & McDermott, S., (1979). Home state voter response and secondary media coverage. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 429–445). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
4. Barnett, G. A., (1981). A multidimensional analysis of the 1976 presidential campaign. Communication Quarterly, 29, 156–165.
5. Becker, L. B., Sobowale, I. A., Cobbey, R. E., & Eyal, C. H., (1980). Debates' effects on voters' understanding of candidates and issues. In G. F., Bishop, R. G., Meadow, & M., Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 126–139). New York: Praeger.
6. Becker, S. L., & Kraus, S., (1978). The study of campaign '76: An overview. Communication Monographs, 45, 265–267.
7. Becker, S. L., Pepper, R., Weimer, L. A., & Kim, J. K., (1979). Information flow and the shaping of meanings. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 384–307). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8. Ben-Zeev, S., & White, I. S., (1962). Effects and implications. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960(pp. 331–337). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9. Benoit, W. L., & Currie, H., (2001). Inaccuracies in media coverage of the 1996 and 2000 presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 28–39.
10. Benoit, W. L., McKinney, M. S., & Holbert, R. L., (2001). Beyond learning and persona: Extending the scope of presidential debate effects. Communication Monographs, 68, 259–273.
11. Benoit, W. L., Webber, D., & Berman, J., (1998). Effects of presidential debate watching and ideology on attitudes and knowledge. Argumentation and Advocacy, 34, 163–172.
12. Benoit, W. L., & Wells, W. T., (1996). Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
13. Berke, R. L., & Sack, K., (2000, October 11). The 2000 campaign: The debates; in debate 2, microscope focuses on Gore. The New York Times [Electronic version]. Retrieved from: http://nytimes.qpass.com/search/restricted/article.
14. Berquist, G. F., Golden, J. L., (1981). Media rhetoric, criticism and the public perception of the 1980 presidential debates. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 67, 125–137.
15. Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R. W., & Tuchfarber, A. J., (1978). Debate watching and the acquisition of political knowledge. Journal of Communication, 28, 99–113.
16. Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R. W., & Tuchfarber, A. J., (1980). The presidential debates as a device for increasing the “rationality” of electoral behavior. In G. F., Bishop, R. G., Meadow, & M., Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 179–196). New York: Praeger.
17. Bowes, J. E., & Strentz, H., (1979). Candidate images: Stereotyping and the 1976 debates. In B. D., Rubin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 2 (pp. 391–406). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
18. Brydon, S. R., (1985). The two faces of Jimmy Carter: The transformation of a presidential debater, 1976 and 1980. Central States Speech Journal, 36, 138–151.
19. Burgoon, J. K., (1980). Nonverbal communication research in the 1970s: An overview. In D., Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 4 (pp. 179–197). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
20. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L., (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193–214.
21. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L., (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes in relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54, 1941.
22. Carpenter, E., (1986). The new languages. In G., Gumpert & R., Cathcart (Eds.), Intermedia: Interpersonal communication in a media world (pp. 353–367). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Casey, G., & Fitzgerald, M. R., (1977, October). Candidate images and the 1976 presidential debates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL.
24. Center for Media and Public Affairs (2000, October 18). Bush is still the biggest joke on late night tv. Retrieved from: http://www.cmpa.com/pressrel/electpr7.htm.
25. Chaffee, S. H., (1978). Presidential debates—Are they helpful to voters? Communication Monographs, 45, 330–346.
26. Chaffee, S. H., & Choe, S. Y., (1980). Time of decision and media use during the Ford-Carter campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 53–69.
27. Chaffee, S. H., & Dennis, J., (1979). Presidential debates: An empirical assessment. In A., Ranney (Ed.), The past and future of presidential debates (pp. 75–101). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
28. Chesebro, J. W., (1984). The media reality: Epistemological functions of media in cultural systems. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 111–130.
29. Davis, D. K., (1979). Influence on vote decisions. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 331–347). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
30. Davis, M. H., (1982). Voting intentions and the 1980 Carter-Reagan debate. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 481–492.
31. Dennis, J., Chaffee, S. H., & Choe, S. Y., (1979). Impact on partisan, image, and issue voting. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 314–330). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
32. Drew, D., & Weaver, D., (1991). Voter learning in the 1988 presidential election: Did the debates and the media matter? Journalism Quarterly, 68, 27–37.
33. Eadie, W. F., Krivonos, P. D., & Goodman, G., (1977, April). Winners and losers: Credibility and the first debate. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Central States Speech Association, Southfield, MI.
34. Ellsworth, J. W., (1965). Rationality and campaigning: A content analysis of the 1960 presidential campaign debates. The Western Political Quarterly, 43, 794–802.
35. Feigert, F. B., & Bowling, W. J., (1980, April). The impact of televised debates on the 1976 presidential election: New myths and old realities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
36. Geer, J. G., (1988). The effects of presidential debates on the electorate's preferences for candidates. American Politics Quarterly, 16, 486–501.
37. Graber, D. A., (1987). Television news without pictures? Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 74–87.
38. Graber, D. A., & Kim, Y. Y., (1978). Why John Q. Voter did not learn much from the 1976 presidential debates. In B. D., Rubin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 2 (pp. 407–421). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
39. Hagner, P. R., & Rieselbach, L. N., (1980). The impact of the 1976 presidential debates: Conversion or reinforcement? In G. F., Bishop, R. G., Meadow, & M., Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 157–178). New York: Praeger.
40. Hall, M., Hillkirk, S., & Ullman, O., (2000, October 18). From the experts. USA Today, A5.
41. Hellweg, S. A., Pfau, M., & Brydon, S. R., (1992). Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. New York: Praeger.
42. Hinck, E. A., (1993). Enacting the presidency: Political argument, presidential debates, and presidential character. Westport, CT: Praeger.
43. James, C., (2000, November 4). Critic's notebook: Where politics and comedy intermingle, the punch lines can draw blood. The New York Times [Electronic version]. Retrieved from: http://nytimes.qpass.com/search/restricted/article.
44. Jamieson, K. H., (1988). Eloquence in an electronic age: The transformation of political speechmaking. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Jamieson, K. H., & Birdsell, D. S., (1988). Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Jamieson, K. H., & Adasiewicz, C., (2000). What voters can learn from election debates. In S., Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates: International perspectives (pp. 25–42). New York: St. Martin's Press.
47. Katz, E., & Feldman, J. J., (1962). The debates in light of research: A survey of surveys. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960 (pp. 173–223). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
48. Kelley, S., Jr. (1962). Candidate debates: Some facts and issues. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 351–366.
49. Kelley, S., Jr. (1983). Interpreting elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50. Kendall, K. E., (1995). Presidential campaign discourse: Strategic communication problem Albany: State University of New York Press.
51. Kennamer, J. D., (1987). Debate viewing and debate discussion as predictors of campaign cognition. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 114–118.
52. Kraus, S., (1988). Televised presidential debates and public policy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Krivonos, P. D., (1976). The first debate: Ford versus Carter—A behavioral criticism. Exetasis, 3, 3–9.
54. Ladd, E. C., & Ferree, G. D., (1981, December/January). Were the pollsters really wrong? Public Opinion, 13–20.
55. Lang, G. E., (1987). Still seeking answers. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 211–214.
56. Lang, G. E., & Lang, K., (1979). Immediate and mediated responses: First debate. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 289–313). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
57. Lang, K., & Lang, G. E., (1979). Reactions of viewers. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 313–330). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
58. Lanoue, D. L., (1992). One that made a difference: Cognitive consistency, political knowledge, and the 1980 presidential debate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 168–184.
59. Lemert, J. B., (1993). Do televised presidential debates help inform voters? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, 83–94.
60. Lemert, J. B., Elliott, W. R., Bernstein, J. M., Rosenberg, W. L., & Nestvold, K. J., (1991). News verdicts, the debates, and presidential campaigns. New York: Praeger.
61. Leuthold, D. A., & Valentine, D. C., (1981). How Reagan “won” the Cleveland debate: Audience predispositions and presidential debate “winners.” Speaker and Gavel, 18, 60–66.
62. Lichtenstein, A., (1982). Differences in impact between local and national televised political candidates' debates. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 296.
63. Lubell, S., (1962). Personalities vs. issues. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960 (pp. 151–162). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
64. Lupfer, M. B., & Wald, K. D., (1979). An experimental study of the first Carter-Ford debate. Experimental Study of Politics, 7, 20–40.
65. Mayer, M. A., & Carlin, D. B., (1994). Debates as a voter education tool. In D. B., Carlin & M. S., McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 127–138). New York: Praeger.
66. McCroskey, J. C., (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65–72.
67. McCroskey, J. C., & Jenson, T. A., (1975). Image of mass media news sources. Journal of Broadcasting, 19, 169–180.
68. McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J., (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 24–34.
69. McLeod, T. M., Durall, J. A., Ziemke, D. A., & Bybee, C. A., (1979). Reactions of young and older voters: Expanding the contexts of effects. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 348–367). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
70. Meadow, R. G., (1987). A speech by any other name. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 207–210.
71. Meyrowitz, J., (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
72. Middleton, R., (1962). National television debates and presidential voting decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 426–438.
73. Miller, A. H., & MacKuen, M., (1979). Informing the electorate: A national study. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 269–297). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
74. Morrow, G. R., (1977). Changes in perceptions of Ford and Carter following their first presidential debate. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 423–429.
75. Mortensen, C. D., (1968). The influence of television on policy discussion. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54, 277–281.
76. Mulder, R. D., (1978). The political effects of the Carter-Ford debate: An experimental analysis. Sociological Focus, 11, 33–45.
77. O'Keefe, G. J., & Mendelsohn, H., (1979). Media influences and their anticipation. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 405–417). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
78. Owen, D., (1991). Media messages in American presidential elections. New York: Greenwood Press.
79. Paletz, D. L., & Guthrie, K. K., (1987). Three faces of Ronald Reagan. Journal of Communication, 37, 7–23.
80. Payne, J. G., Golden, J. L., Marlier, J., & Ratzan, S. C., (1989). Perceptions of the 1988 presidential and vice-presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 425–435.
81. Pfau, M., (1990). A channel approach to television influence. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34, 195–24.
82. Pfau, M., Cho, J., & Chong, K., (2001). Impact of communication forms in presidential campaigns: Influences on candidate perceptions and democratic process. Press/Politics, 6, 88–105.
83. Pfau, M., Diedrich, T., Larson, K. M, & Van Winkle, K. M., (1993). Relational and competence perceptions of presidential candidates during primary election campaigns. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, 275–292.
84. Pfau, M., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (1994). Debates versus other communication sources: The pattern of information and influence. In D. B., Carlin & M. S., McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 155–173). New York: Praeger.
85. Pfau, M., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (1996). Influence of traditional and non-traditional news media in the 1992 election campaign. Western Journal of Communication, 60, 214–232.
86. Pfau, M., & Kang, J. G., (1991). The impact of relational messages on candidate influence in televised political debates. Communication Studies, 42, 114–128.
87. Robinson, J. P., (1979). The polls. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 262–268). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
88. Rose, D. D., (1979). Citizen uses of the Ford-Carter debates. Journal of Politics, 41, 214–221.
89. Roper, B. W., (1977, September). The effects of debates on the Carter/Ford election. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
90. Roper, E., (1960, November). Polling post-mortem. Saturday Review, 10–13.
91. Rosenthal, P. I., (1963). Ethos in the presidential campaign of 1960: A study of the basic persuasive process of the Kennedy-Nixon television debates. Ph.D., dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
92. Rouner, D., & Perloff, R. M., (1988). Selective perception of outcome of first 1984 presidential debate. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 141–147.
93. Ruesch, J., & Bateson, G., (1951). Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
94. Schroeder, A., (2000). Presidential debates: Forty years of high-risk tv. New York: Columbia University Press.
95. Sears, D. O., & Chaffee, S. H., (1979). Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of empirical studies. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 223–261). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
96. Sebald, H., (1962). Limitations of communication: Mechanisms of image maintenance in the form of selective perception, selective memory, and selective distortion. Journal of Communication, 12, 142–149.
97. Sella, M., (2000, September 24). The stiff guy vs. the dumb guy. The New York Times [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://nytimes.qpass.com/search/restricted/article.
98. Sigelman, L., & Sigelman, C. K., (1984). Judgments of the Carter-Reagan debate: The eyes of the beholder. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 624–628.
99. Simons, H. W., & Liebowitz, K., (1979). Shifts in candidate images. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great clebates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 398–404). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
100. Smith, R. G., (1977). The Carter-Ford debates: Some perceptions from academe. Central States Speech Journal, 28, 250–257.
101. Steeper, F. T., (1980). Public response to Gerald Ford's statements on Eastern Europe in the second debate. In G. F., Bishop, R. G., Meadow, & M., Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 81–101). New York: Praeger.
102. Strope, L., (2000, October 22). Pols' images are live from New York. Wisconsin State Journal, A-4.
103. Swerdlow, J. L., (1984). Beyond debate: A paper on televised presidential debates. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
104. Tannenbaum, P. H., Greenberg, B. S., & Silverman, F. R., (1962). Candidate images. In S., Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960 (pp. 271–288). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
105. Traugott, M. W., (2001). Assessing poll performance in the 2000 campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 389–419.
106. Twentieth Century Task Force on Televised Presidential Debates (1979). With the nation watching: Report of the Twentieth Century Task Force on Televised Presidential Debates. Lexington, MA: D. C. Health & Company.
107. Vancil, D. L., & Pendel, S. D., (1984). Winning presidential debates: An analysis of criteria influencing audience response. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 62–74.
108. Wald, K. D., & Lupfer, M. B., (1978). The presidential debate as a civics lesson. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 342–353.
109. Walker, J. R., & Peterson, D. S., (1981, November). Image changers and presidential debates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Anaheim, CA.
110. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D., (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton.
111. West, D. M., (2000). How issue ads have reshaped American politics. In J. A., Thurber, C. J., Nelson, & D. A., Dulio (Eds.), Crowded airwaves: Campaign advertising in elections (pp. 149–169). Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.
112. Zhu, J. H., Milavsky, J. R, & Biswas, R., (1994). Do televised debates affect image perception more than issue knowledge. Human Communication Research, 20, 302–333.