Breakthroughs in Radiography: Computed Radiography

Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 58-66

  Mattoon, John S ^a   Smith, Carin ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Smith Veterinary Consulting   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742323663     PISSN: 01931903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Greene RE, Oestmann J: Computed Digital Radiography in Clinical Practice. New York, Thieme Medical Publishers, 1992, pp 2-46.
2. Roberts G, Graham J: Computed radiography, in Kraft S, Roberts G (eds): Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract: Modern Diagnostic Imaging. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2001, pp 47-62.
3. Launders J: Digital x-ray systems, Part 1: Health devices; An introduction to DX technologies and an evaluation of cassette DX systems. Health Devices 30(8):273-310, 2001.
4. Fujifilm: CR vs. DR. Available at http://www.fujimed.com/medical/crvsdr.html; accessed November 2003.
5. IDEXX Laboratories: Enhance Your Patient's Image. Available at http://www.idexx.com/AnimalHealth/Digital/index.cfm; accessed November 2003.
6. American Association of Physicists in Medicine: Acceptance Testing and Quality Control of Photo Stimulate Phosphor Imaging Systems: Report of Task Group #10, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Available at www.thecapturedimage.com/pdf/aapm10v3.doc; accessed November 2003.
7. All Pets Dental: Why Radiology? Available at http://www.dentalvet.com/vets/basicdentistry/whywhenliow_radiology.htm; accessed November 2003.
8. Fujifilm: Basic CR Theory. Available at http://www.fujimed.com/medical/cr_basics.html; accessed November 2003.
9. IDEXX Laboratories: Benefit from Innovation in Image Enhancement and Management. Available at http://www.idexx.com/AnimalHealth/Digital/PACS/; accessed November 2003.
10. Swee RG, Gray JE, Beabout JW, et al: Screen-film versus computed radiography imaging of the hand: A direct comparison. Am J Roentgenol 168(2):539-542, 1997.
11. Don S, Hildebolt CF, Sharp TL, et al: Computed radiography versus screen-film radiography: Detection of pulmonary edema in a rabbit model that stimulates neonatal pulmonary infiltrates. Radiology 213:455-460, 1999.
12. Reiner B, Siegel E, McLaurin T, et al: Evaluation of soft-tissue foreign bodies: Comparing conventional plain film radiography, computed radiography printed on film, and computed radiography displayed on a computer work-station. Am J Roentgenol 167(1):141-44, 1996.
13. Wegryn SA, Piraino DW, Richmond BJ, et al: Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: An observer performance study. Radiology 175(1):225-228, 1990.
14. Roberts G: Computed radiography: How it works and its advantages. The AAEP 2000 Resort Symposium Lecture Workbook, February 4-6, 2000.
15. Fujifilm: Advanced Processing Capabilities of FCR. Available at http://www.fujimed.com/medical/cr_process5.html; accessed November 2003.
16. Murphey MD, Bramble JM, Cook LT, et al: Nondisplaced fractures: Spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging. Radiology 174(3 Pt 1):865-870, 1990.
17. Lund PJ, Krupinski EA, Pereles S, Mockbee B: Comparison of conventional and computed radiography: Assessment of image quality and reader performance in skeletal extremity trauma. Acad Radiol 4(8):570-576, 1997.
18. Ogoda M: DICOM 101: Understanding the Basics of DICOM. Insights & Images; The User's Publication of Computed Radiography, Stamford, CT, Fujifilm Medical Systems, 2001, pp 2, 4.