Imaging the dense breast

Applied Radiology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 22-26

  Hersh, Marla R ^a  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; RADIOISOTOPE;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 0742271688     PISSN: 01609963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Heine JJ, Malhotra, P. Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis and digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;9:398-435.
2. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS). 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 1998.
3. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: Detection with screening US - diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology. 1998;207:191-199.
4. Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Jong RA, et al. Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. RadioGraphics. 1998; 18:1587-1598.
5. Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:886-894.
6. Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Slone S, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:30-37.
7. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Int Med. 2003;138:168-175.
8. Venta LA, Hendrick E, Adler YT, et al. Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1241-1248.
9. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology. 2001;218:873-880.
10. Brem RF, Hoffmeister J, Baum JK, et al. Impact of breast density on the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) system. Presented to the RSNA, Chicago, IL; December 2002.
11. Ho WT, Lam PWT. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol. 2003;58:133-136.
12. Vyborny CJ, Doi T, O'Shaughnessy KF, et al. Breast cancer: Importance of spiculation in computer-aided detection. Radiology. 2000;215:703-707.
13. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology. 2001;219:192-202.
14. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening, mammography, physical examination and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225:165-175.
15. Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz M. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:177-182.
16. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable beast cancers: The importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1675-1679.
17. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. Radiology. 2003;180:901-910.
18. Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, Thelen M. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: Sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1493-1501.
19. Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: Preliminary results. Radiology. 2003;226:773-778.
20. Tilanus-Linthorst MA, Obdeijn IMM, Bartels KCM, et al. First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;63:53-60.
21. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1095-1102.
22. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography and ultrasound for surveillance of woman at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3524-3531.
23. Kuhl CK. High risk screening: Multi-modality surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer (proven or suspected carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene) J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002;21(3 Supp):103-106.
24. 99mTc Sestamibi breast imaging for the examination of patients with dense and fatty breasts: Multicenter study. Radiology. 2002;222:149-155.