Contact dermatitis alternatives 2003

Advances in Dermatology

Volumn 19, Issue , 2003, Pages 113-138

  Scheman, Andrew ^a   Katta, Rajani ^b   James, William D ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 HYDROXYBENZOIC ACID ESTER; ALLERGEN; ANTIHISTAMINIC AGENT; BALSAM PERU; BENZOCAINE; BUPIVACAINE; CHLOROPROCAINE; COBALT; COSMETIC; DISULFIRAM; EPOXY RESIN; ETHYLENEDIAMINE; FORMALDEHYDE; FRAGRANCE; GENTAMICIN; KATHON CG; LIDOCAINE; MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE; NEOMYCIN; NICKEL; PRILOCAINE; PROCAINE; PROPOXYCAINE; PROXYMETACAINE; ROSIN; RUBBER; TETRACAINE; THIOL DERIVATIVE; TOBRAMYCIN; UNINDEXED DRUG;

CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; COSMETIC INDUSTRY; DERMATOLOGY; HUMAN; PATCH TEST; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSONAL HYGIENE; REVIEW; SENSITIZATION; SKIN ALLERGY;

ALLERGENS; COSMETICS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; PATCH TESTS; PATIENT EDUCATION;

EID: 0642368049     PISSN: 08820880     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Prue C, Martinson ME, McAnally PM, Stagner WC: Postmarketing survey results of T.R.U.E. TEST, a new allergen patch test. Am J Contact Dermat 9:6-10, 1998.
2. Warshaw EM, Nelson D: Prevalence of patch testing and methodology of dermatologists in the US: Results of a cross-sectional survey. Am J Contact Dermat 13:53-58, 2002.
3. Sherertz EF, Fransway AF, Belsito DV, et al: Patch testing discordance alert: False-negative findings with rubber additives and fragrances. J Am Acad Dermatol 45:313-314, 2001.
4. Larkin A, Rietschel RL: The utility of patch tests using larger screening series of allergens. Am J Contact Dermat 9:142-145, 1998.
5. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF: Fisher's Contact Dermatitis, ed 5. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
6. Cohen DE, Brancaccio R, Andersen D, et al: Utility of a standard allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: A retrospective study of 732 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 36:914-918, 1997.
7. Marks JG, Deleo VA: Contact and Occupational Dermatology, ed 2. St Louis, Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 1997.
8. Yiannias JA, el-Azhary RA. Contact allergen avoidance program: A topical skin care product database. Am J Contact Dermat 11:243-247, 2000.
9. Hausen BM: Contact allergy to balsam of Peru. II. Patch test results in 102 patients with selected balsam of Peru constituents. Am J Contact Dermat 12:93-102, 2001.
10. Fisher AA: Nonoccupational dermatitis to "black" rubber mix: part II. Cutis 49:229-230, 1992.
11. Ventura MT, Dagnello M, Matino MG, et al: Contact dermatitis in students practicing sports: Incidence of rubber sensitization. Br J Sports Med 35:100-102, 2001.
12. Nettis E, Colanardi MC, Soccio AL, et al: Occupational irritant and allergic contact dermatitis among healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 46:101-107, 2002.
13. Gibbon KL, McFadden JP, Rycroft RJ, et al: Changing frequency of thiuram allergy in healthcare workers with hand dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 144:347-350, 2001.
14. Rago A, Roley L: In-use barrier integrity of glove: Latex and nitrile superior to vinyl. Am J Infect Control 27:405-410, 1999.
15. Fisher AA: The new female and male polyurethane condoms. Cutis 56:82, 1995.
16. Downs AM, Sansom JE: Colophony allergy: A review. Contact Dermatitis 41:305-310, 1999.
17. Saseville D, Tennstedt D, Lachapelle JM: Allergic contact dermatitis from hydrocolloid dressings. Am J Contact Dermat 8:236-238, 1997.
18. Scheman AS, Severson DL: Pocket guide to medications used in dermatology, ed 7. Baltimore, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
19. Ash S, Scheman AJ: Systemic contact dermatitis to hydroxyzine. Am J Contact Dermat 8:2-5, 1997.
20. Maouad M, Fleischer AB, Sherertz EF, et al: Significance-prevalence index number: a reinterpretation and enhancement of data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. J Am Acad Dermatol 41:573-576, 1999.
21. Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T, et al: Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part II). Contact Dermatitis 44:344-346, 2001.
22. Scheman A: Adverse reactions to cosmetic ingredients. Dermatol Clin 18:685-698, 2000.
23. Scheinman PL: Exposing covert fragrance chemicals. Am J Contact Dermat 12:225-228, 2001.
24. Jacobs MC, White IR, Rycroft RJ, et al: Patch testing with preservatives at St. John's from 1982-1993. Contact Dermatitis 33:247-254, 1995.
25. Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Andersen KE, et al: Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe: A 10-year overview (1991-2000). Contact Dermatitis 46:207-210, 2002.
26. Katz BE, Fisher AA: Bacitracin: A unique topical antibiotic sensitizer. J Am Acad Dermatol 17:1016-1024, 1987.
27. Kimura M, Kawada A: Contact sensitivity induced by neomycin with cross-sensitivity to other aminoglycoside antibiotics. Contact Dermatitis 39:148-150, 1998.
28. Adams RM, Fisher AA: Contact allergen alternatives. J Am Acad Dermatol 14:951-969, 1986.
29. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al: North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch-Test Results, 1996-1998. Arch Dermatol 136:272-273, 2000.
30. Nestle FO, Spiedel H, Speidel MO: Metallurgy: High nickel release from 1- and 2-euro coins. Nature 419:132, 2002.
31. Haudrechy P, Mantout B, Frappaz A, et al: Nickel release from stainless steels. Contact Dermatitis 37:113-117, 1997.
32. Dobson RL: Earrings for nickel-sensitive women. J Am Acad Dermatol 16:631, 1987.
33. Gawkrodger DJ, Healy J, Howe AM: The prevention of nickel contact dermatitis. A review of the use of binding agents and barrier creams. Contact Dermatitis 32:257-265, 1995.
34. Memon AA, Molokhia MM, Friedmann PS: The inhibitory effects of topical chelating agents and antioxidants on nickel-induced hypersensitivity reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 30:560-565, 1994.
35. Kaufmann RE, Banner W, Blumer JL, et al: Clioquinol (iodochlorohydroxyquin, Vioform) and iodoquinol (diiodohydroxyquin): Blindness and neuropathy. Pediatrics 86:797-798, 1990.
36. Wohrl S, Kriechbaumer N, Hemmer W, et al: A cream containing the chelator DTPA (diethyelenetriaminepenta-acetic acid) can prevent contact allergic reactions to metals. Contact Dermatitis 44:224-228, 2001.
37. Mowad CM: Allergic contact dermatitis caused by parabens: 2 Case reports and a review. Am J Contact Dermat 11:53-56, 2000.
38. Adams RM, Maibach HI: A five year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermat 13:1062-1069, 1985.
39. Scheman AJ: New trends in hair care products: An update for dermatologists. Cosmetic Derm 11:17-21, 1998.
40. Fautz R, Fuchs A, van der Walle H, et al: Hair dye-sensitized hairdressers: The cross-reaction pattern with new generation hair dyes. Contact Dermatitis 46:319-324, 2002.
41. Shapiro M, Mowad C, James WD: Contact dermatitis due to printer's ink in a milk industry employee: Case report and review of the allergen paraphenylenediamine. Am J Contact Dermat 12:109-112, 2001.
42. Brancaccio RR, Brown LH, Chang YT, et al: Identification and quantification of para-phenylenediamine in a temporary black henna tattoo. Am J Contact Dermat 13:15-18, 2002.
43. Mancuso G, Reggiani M, Berdondini RM: Occupational dermatitis in shoemakers. Contact Dermatitis 34:17-22, 1996.
44. Suneja T, Belsito DV: Thimerosal in the detection of clinically relevant allergic contact reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 45:23-27, 2001.
45. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, et al: Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials, and industrial biocides. Results from a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol 138:467-476, 1998.
46. Audicana MT, Munoz D, del Pozo MD, et al: Allergic contact dermatitis from mercury antiseptics and derivatives: Study protocol of tolerance to intramuscular injections of thimerosal. Am J Contact Dermat 13:3-9, 2002.
47. Giordano-Labadie F, Rance F, Pellegrin F, et al: Frequency of contact allergy in children with atopic dermatitis: Results of a prospective study of 137 cases. Contact Dermatitis 40:192-195, 1999.