Effect of dentinal tubule orientation on the microtensile bond strength to primary dentin

Journal of Dentistry for Children

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 139-144

  Çehreli, Zafer C ^a   Akça, Taner ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bond strength; Dentin; Dentinal tubules

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN; WATER; COMPOMER;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH FRACTURE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHEMISTRY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL BONDING; MATERIALS TESTING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; WATER;

EID: 0642346938     PISSN: 15518949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Welbury RR, Walls AWG, Murray JJ. The management of caries in deciduous molars: 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J. 1991;170:177-181.
2. Kilpatrick NM. Durability of restorations in primary molars. J Dent. 1993;21:211-214.
3. Forsten L, Karjalainen S. Glass ionomers in proximal cavities of primary molars. Scand J Dent Res. 1990;98:70-73.
4. Mount GJ. Clinical performances in glass ionomers. Biomaterials. 1998;19:573-579.
5. Roeters JJ, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk, RC, et al. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. Am J Dent. 1998;11:143-148.
6. van Dijken, JWV. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin modified glass-ionomer and a resin composite in class III restorations. Am J Dent. 1996;9:195-198.
7. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, et al. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: A 2-year follow-up study. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21:232-235.
8. Marks LAM, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, et al. Ketac Molar versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: 12-month clinical results. J Dent Child. 2000;67:37-41.
9. Cehreli ZC, Usmen E. Effect of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of compomers to human primary and permanent enamel. Am J Dent. 1999;12:26-30.
10. Andersson-Wenckert IE, Folkesson UH, van Dijken JW. Durability of a polyacid modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars: A multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997;55:255-260.
11. Berg JH. The continuum of restorative materials in pediatrie dentistry: A review for the clinician. Pediatr Dent. 1998;20:93-100.
12. Miller BJ, Abiden F, Nicholson JW. In vitro caries inhibition by polyacid-modified composite-resins (compomers). J Dent. 1998;26:133-136.
13. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials. 1998;19:503-508.
14. ten Cate JM, Damen JJ, Buijs MJ. Inhibition of dentin demineralization by fluoride in vitro. Caries Res. 1998;32:141-147.
15. Cehreli ZC, Altay N. Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in minimally-invasive occlusal cavities. J Dent. 2000;28:117-122.
16. Kielbassa AM, Wrbas KT, Hellwig E. Initial tensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomers and polyacid-modified resins on perfused primary dentin. J Dent Child. 1997;64:183-187.
17. Jumlongras D, White GE. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1997;21:223-229.
18. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Long-term effects of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent. 2000;25:11-19.
19. Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1336-1342.
20. Atac A, Cehreli ZC, Sener B. Antibacterial activity of fifth-generation dentin bonding systems. J Endod. 2001;27:730-733.
21. Abate PF, Bertacchini SM, Polack MA, et al. Adhesion of a compomer to dental structures. Quintessence Int. 1997;28:509-512.
22. Hse KMY, Wei SHY. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:1088-1096.
23. White SN, Luo W, Paine ML, et al. Biological organization of hydroxyapatite crystallites into a fibrous continuum that toughens and controls anisotropy in human enamel. J Dent Res. 2001;80:321-326.
24. Watanabe LG, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. Dentin shear strength: Effects of tubule orientation and intratooth location. Dent Mater. 1997;12:109-115.
25. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: Its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent. 1992;5:127-129.
26. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, et al. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in Class V and Class II preparations. J Dent. 1997;25:379-389.
27. Harnirattisai C, Inokoshi S, Shimado Y, et al. Interfacial morphology of an adhesive composite resin and etched caries in affected dentin. Oper Dent. 1992;17:222-228.
28. Harnirattisai C, Inokoshi S, Shimado Y, et al: Adhesive interface between resin and etched dentin of cervical erosion/abrasion lesions. Oper Dent. 1993;18:138-214.
29. Nör JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, et al. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1996;75:1396-1403.
30. Sano S, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength: Evaluation of a microtensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1994;10:236-240.
31. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, et al. The microtensile bond test: A review. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:299-309.
32. Nakajima M, Ogata M, Okuda M, et al. Bonding to caries-affected dentin using self-etching primers. Am J Dent. 1999;12:309-314.
33. Nakajima M, Sano H, Zheng L, et al. Effect of moist vs. dry bonding to normal vs. caries-affected dentin with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1298-1303.
34. Perdigao J, Eiriksson S, Rosa BT, et al. Effect of calcium removal on dentin bond strengths. Quintessence Int. 2001;32:142-146.
35. Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Arao T. A tensile test to facilitate identification of defects in dentin bonded specimens. J Dent. 1998;26:379-385.
36. Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I, et al. Bond strengths of single-bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent. 2000;25:2-10.
37. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, et al. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1205-1211.
38. Sudsangiam S, Van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent. 1989;1:57-67.
39. Spencer P, Swafford JR. Unprotected protein at the dentin-adhesive interface. Quintessence Int. 1999;30:501-507.
40. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PNR, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res. 1999;78:906-911.
41. Gwinnett AJ, Yu S. Effect of long-term water storage on dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 1995;8:109-111.
42. Kato G, Nakabayashi N. The durability of adhesion to phosphoric acid etched, wet dentin substrates. Dent Mater. 1998;14:347-352.
43. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, et al. The influence of storage solution on dentin bond durability of resin cement. J Dent. 2000;16:1-6.
44. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res. 1997;76:1298-1307.
45. Montes MAJR, deGoes MF, daCunha MRB, et al. A morphological and tensile bond strength evaluation of an unfilled adhesive with low-viscosity composites and a filled adhesive in 1 and 2 coats. J Dent. 2001;29:435-41.
46. Sumikawa DA, Marshall GW, Gee L, et al. Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21:439-444.
47. Bastos PA, Retief DH, Bradley EL, et al. Effect of etch duration on the shear bond strength of a microfill composite resin to enamel. Am J Dent. 1988;1:151-157.
48. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:95-110.
49. Cassandra JE, McCourt JW. Bond strength of dentinal adhesives in primary teeth. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:271-273.
50. Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Yoshida M, et al. Fluoridated light-activated bonding resin adhesion to enamel and dentin: Primary vs. permanent. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:101-106.