Automation-related "complacency": Theory, empirical data, and design implications

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 463-467

  Metzger, Ulla ^a   Parasuraman, Raja ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; STUDENTS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

AUTOMATION SYSTEMS; HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTION;

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0442310964     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120104500442     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Billings, C. E., Lauber, J. K., Funkhouser, H., Lyman, G., & Huff, E. M. (1976). NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (Tech. Rep. TM-X-3445. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
2. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
3. Comstock, J. R. & Arnegard, R. J. (1992). The multi-attribute task battery for human operator workload and strategic behavior research. Technical Memorandum 104174. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA.
4. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Duley, J. A., Westerman, S., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1997). Effects of display superimposition on monitoring of automation. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 322-328). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
6. Farrell, S. & Lewandowsky, S. (2000). A connectionist model of complacency and adaptive recovery under automation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 395-410.
7. Gopher, D. (1996). Attention control: explorations of the work of an executive controller. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 23-38.
8. Gopher, D., Weil M. & Siegel, D. (1989). Practice under changing priorities: An approach to the training of complex skills. Acta Psychologica, 71, 147-177.
9. Healy, A. F. & MCNamara, D. S. (1995). A generation advantage for multiplication skill training and nonword vocabulary acquisition. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (eds.), Learning and memory of knowledge and skills: Durability and specificity (pp. 132-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. L., Weber, T. A., & Bardell, L. (1999). Training for executive control: Task coordination strategies and aging. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVII Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 617-652). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
12. Metzger, U., Duley, J. A., Abbas, R., & Parasuraman, R. (2000). Effects of variable-priority training on automation-related complacency: Performance and eye movements. In Proceedings of the 14th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: HFES
13. th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, March 5-8, 2001, Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
14. Molloy, R. & Parasuraman, R. (1994). Automation-induced monitoring inefficiency: The role of display integration and redundant color coding. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.) Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 224-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
15. th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 68-71). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
16. Moray, N. (1993). Designing for attention. In A. Baddeley and L. Weiskrantz (Eds.) Attention: Selection, awareness, and control. A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 111-134) Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
17. Moray, N. (2000). Are observers ever really complacent when monitoring automated systems? In Proceedings of the 14th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: HFES
18. Parasuraman, R. (2000). Designing automation for human use: Empirical studies and quantitative models. Ergonomics, 43, 931-951.
19. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R. & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency". International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
20. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., & Molloy, R. (1996). Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Human Factors, 38, 665-679.
21. Parasuraman, R. & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
22. Pashler, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
24. Sanders, A. F. (1993). On the output of a visual fixation. In A. Baddeley and L. Weiskrantz (Eds.) Attention: Selection, awareness, and control. A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 36-52) Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
25. Sklar, A.E. and Sarter, N.B. (1999). "Good vibrations": The use of tactile feedback in support of mode awareness on advanced technology aircraft. Human Factors, 41(4), 543-552.
26. Slamecka, N. J. & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
27. Thackray, R. I. & Touchstone, R. M. (1989). Detection efficiency on an air traffic control monitoring task with and without computer aiding. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, 744-748.
28. von Helmholtz, H. (1894). Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Leipzig, Germany: Leopold Voss.
29. th Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar. Denver, Co: Flight Safety Foundation, Inc.