Lκ factorial experiments with hard-to-change and easy-to-change factors

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 411-421

  Ju, Huey L ^a   Lucas, James M ^b  

^a StatPlus Inc   (United States)

^b J M Lucas and Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Blocking; Restricted randomization; Split plot designs

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RANDOM PROCESSES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EASY-TO-CHANGE FACTORS; EXPERIMENTAL FACTORS; HARD-TO-CHANGE FACTORS;

STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 0012163532     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2002.11980173     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Anderson, V. L. and McLean, R. A. (1974). Design of Experiments: A Realistic Approach. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
2. Anbari, F. T. (1993). "Experimental Designs for Quality Improvement When There Are Hard-to-Change and Easy-to-Change Factors". Ph.D. Dissertation, Drexel University.
3. Anbari, F. T. and Lucas, J. M. (1994). "Super Efficient Designs When There are Hard-to-Change and Easy-to-Change Factors". ASQC Annual Quality Congress Transactions, pp. 852-863.
4. Ganju, J. (1994). "Diagnostics for Inherent Split-plotting in Designed Experiments". Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware.
5. Ganju, J. and Lucas, J. M. (1997). "Bias in Test Statistics when Restrictions on Randomization are Caused by Factors". Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 26, pp. 47-63.
6. Ganju, J. and Lucas, J. M. (1999). "Detecting Randomization Restrictions Caused by Factors". Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 81, pp. 129-140.
7. Ganju, J. and Lucas, J. M. (2000). "Analysis of Unbalanced Data from an Experiment with Random Block Effects and Unequally Spaced Factor Levels". The American Statistician 54, pp. 5-11.
8. Ju, H. L. (1992). "Split Plotting and Randomization in Industrial Experiments". Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware.
9. Kempthorne, O. (1989). "Comment on Simo and Styan". The American Statistician 43, pp. 161-162.
10. Kiefer, J. and Wolfowitz, J. (1990). "The Equivalence of Two Extremum Problems". Canadian Journal of Mathematics 12, pp 363-366.
11. Letsinger, J. D.; Myers, R. H.; and Lentner, M. (1996). "Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures". Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381-397.
12. Lorenzen, T. and Anderson, V. L. (1993). Design of Experiments: A No Name Approach. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
13. Lucas, J. M. (1999). "Comparing Randomization and a Random Run Order In Experimental Design". ASQ Annual Quality Congress Transactions pp. 29-35.
14. Webb, D. F. (1999). "Randomization Restrictions and the Inadvertent Split Plot in Industrial Experimentation". Ph. D. Dissertation, Montana State University-Bozeman.