Values and value dilemmas in relation to judgments concerning outcomes of an industrial conflict

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 446-459

  Feather, N T ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044534723     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202287003     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Braithwaite, V. (1998). The value balance model of political evaluations. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 223-247.
2. Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press.
3. Feather, N. T. (1979). Value correlates of conservatism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1617-1630.
4. Feather, N. T. (1984). Protestant ethic, conservatism, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1132-1141.
5. Feather, N.T. (1994). Human values and their relation to justice. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 129-151.
6. Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135-1151.
7. Feather, N. T. (1996). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 215-252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528-544.
9. Feather, N.T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
10. Feather, N. T., Boeckmann, R. J., & McKee, I. R. (2001). Reactions to an offense in relation to authoritarianism, knowledge about risk, and freedom of action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 109-126.
11. Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469-506.
12. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.3. Chicago:Scientific Software International.
13. Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
15. MacCallum, R. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107-120.
16. Peterson, R. S. (1994). The role of values in predicting fairness judgments and support of affirmative action. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 95-115.
17. Rasinski, K. A. (1987). What's fair is fair - Or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 201-211.
18. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
19. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Sniderman, P. M., Tetlock, P. E., & Carmines, E. G. (1993). Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21. Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 365-375.
22. Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R. S., & Lerner, J. S. (1996). Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context vari ables. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 25-51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
24. Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.