The mean-integral representation of rectangles

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 250-262

  Macmillan, Neil A ^a   Ornstein, Adam S ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031991283     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206034     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ASHBY, F. G., & GOTT, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 33-53.
2. ASHBY, F. G., & LEE, W. W. (1991). Predicting similarity and categorization from identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 120, 150-172.
3. ASHBY, F. G., & MADDOX, W. T. (1991). A response time theory of perceptual independence. In J. P. Doignon & J. C. Falmagne (Eds.), Mathematical psychology: Current developments (pp. 389-413). New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. ASHBY, F. G., & MADDOX, W. T. (1994). A response time theory of separability and integrality in speeded classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 423-466.
5. ASHBY, F. G., & PERRIN, N. A. (1988). Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition. Psychological Review, 95, 124-150.
6. ASHBY, F. G., & TOWNSEND, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
7. BORG, I., & LEUTNER, D. (1983). Dimensional models for the perception of rectangles. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 257-267.
8. DORFMAN, D. D., & ALF, E., JR. (1969). Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals - Rating method data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 487-496.
9. DUNN, J. C. (1983). Spatial metrics of integral and separable dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 242-257.
10. DYKES, J. R., JR. (1979). A demonstration of selection of analyzers for integral dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 734-745.
11. DYKES, J. R., JR., & COOPER, R. G., JR. (1978). An investigation of the perceptual basis of redundancy gain and orthogonal interference for integral dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 36-42.
12. FELFOLDY, G. L. (1974). Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 453-459.
13. GARNER, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
14. GARNER, W. R., & FELFOLDY, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225-241.
15. GOUREVITCH, V., & GALANTER, E. (1967). A significance test for one-parameter isosensitivity functions. Psychometrika, 32, 25-33.
16. GRAHAM, N. V. (1989). Visual pattern analyzers. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. KADLEC, H. (1995). Multidimensional signal detection analyses (MSDA) for testing separability and independence: A Pascal program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 442-458.
18. KADLEC, H., & TOWNSEND, J. T. (1992). Signal detection analyses of dimensional interactions. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 181-227). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. KINGSTON, J., & MACMILLAN, N. A. (1995). Integrality of nasalization and F1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: A detection-theoretic application of the Garner paradigm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1261-1285.
20. KINGSTON, J., MACMILLAN, N. A., DICKEY, L. W., THORBURN, R., & BARTELS, C. (1997). Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 1696-1709.
21. KRANTZ, D. J., & TVERSKY, A. (1975). Similarity of rectangles: An analysis of subjective dimensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 4-34.
22. KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density. Psychological Review, 85, 445-463.
23. LAZARTE, A. A., & SCHÖNEMANN, P. H. (1991). Saliency metric for subadditive dissimilarity judgments of rectangles. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 142-158.
24. LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1970). Identification and the form of multidimensional discrimination space. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 1-10.
25. LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1972). Processing dimensional stimuli: A note. Psychological Review, 79, 410-419,
26. LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1979). Holistic versus analytic process models: A reply. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 746-755.
27. LOCKHEAD, G. R., & KING, M. C. (1977). Classifying integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 436-443.
28. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. MACMILLAN, N. A., & KINGSTON, J. (1995). Integrality, correspondence, and configurality represent different degrees of perceptual interaction, not different types. In C.-A. Possamai (Ed.), Fechner Day 95 (pp. 243-248). Cassis, France: International Society for Psychophysics.
30. MADDOX, W. T. (1992). Perceptual and decisional separability. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 147-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. MADDOX, W. T., & ASHBY, F. G. (1996). Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 795-817.
32. MARASCUILO, L. A. (1970). Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses. Psychometrika, 35, 237-243.
33. MELARA, R. D., & O'BRIEN, T. P. (1987). Interaction between synesthetically corresponding dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 323-336.
34. MONAHAN, J. S., & LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1977) Identification of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 94-110.
35. POSNER, M. I. (1964). Information reduction in the analysis of sequential tasks. Psychological Review, 71, 491-504.
36. SCHÖNEMANN, P. H. (1990). Psychophysical maps for rectangles. In H.-G. Geissler (Ed.), Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 149-164). Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber.
37. SCHÖNEMANN, P. H., DORCEY, T., & KIENAPPLE, K. (1985). Subadditive concatenation in dissimilarity judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 1-17.
38. SCHÖNEMANN, P. H., & LAZARTE, A. (1987). Psychophysical maps for subadditive dissimilarity ratings. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 342-354.
39. SHEPARD, R. N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 54-87.
40. SWETS, J. A., & PICKETT, R. M. (1982). Evaluation of diagnostic systems: Methods from signal detection theory. New York: Academic Press.
41. WEINTRAUB, D. J. (1971). Rectangle discnminability: Perceptual relativity and the law of Prägnanz. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 1-11.
42. WENDER, K. (1971). A test of independence of dimensions in multidimensional scaling. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 30-32.
43. WIENER-EHRLICH, W. K. (1978). Dimensional and metric structures in multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 399-414.