Utility of canine microsatellites in revealing the relationships of pure bred dogs

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 104-107

  Zajc, Irena ^a   Sampson, J ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (Slovenia)

^b ANIMAL HEALTH TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

CONFERENCE PAPER; DOG; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BREEDING; DOGS; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PATERNITY;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS; MAMMALIA;

EID: 0032955387     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/90.1.104     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Botstein D, White R, Skolnik M, and Davis RW, 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Am J Hum Genet 32: 314-331.
2. Bowcock AM, Riuz-Linare A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, and Kidd JR, 1994. High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368: 455-457.
3. Bruford MW and Wayne RK, 1993. Microsatellites and their application to population genetic studies. Curr Opin Genet Dev 3:939-943.
4. Chakraborty R and Kidd KK, 1991. The utility of DNA in forensic work. Science 254:1735-1739.
5. Fredholm M and Wintero AK, 1995. Variation of short tandem repeats within and between species belonging to Canidae family. Mamm Genome 6:11-18.
6. Goldstein DB, Ruiz Linares A, Cavalli-Sforza LL, and Feldman MW, 1995. An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. Genetics 139:463-471.
7. Gottelli D, Sillero-Zubiri C, Applebaum GD, Roy MS, Girman DJ, Garcia-Moreno J, Ostrander EA, and Wayne RK, 1994. Molecular genetics of the most endangered Canid: the Ethiopian wolf, Canis simensis. Mol Ecol 3:301-312.
8. Gundel H and Reetz I, 1981. Exclusion probabilities obtainable by biochemical polymorphism in dogs. Anim Blood Groups Biochem Genet 12:123-132.
9. Hartl DL and Clark AG, 1988. Principles of population genetics. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
10. Jeffreys AJ, Hillel J, Hartley N, Bulfield G, Morton DB, Wilson V, Wong V, and Harris S, 1987. The implications of hypervariable DNA regions for animal identification: hypervariable DNA and genetic fingerprint. Anim Genet 17:141-142.
11. Jeffreys AJ and Morton DB, 1987. DNA fingerprints of dogs and cats. Anim Genet 18:1-15.
12. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, and Thein SL, 1985. Individual specific DNA "fingerprints" of human DNA. Nature 316: 76-79.
13. Mellersh CS and Sampson J, 1993. Simplifying detection of microsatellite length polymorphisms. Biotechniques 15:582-584.
14. Nei M, 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
15. n markers for genetic mapping in dog. Genomics 16:207-213.
16. Pena SDJ and Chakraborty R, 1994. Paternity testing in the DNA era. Trends Genet 10:204-209.
17. Queller DC, Strasmann JE, and Hughes CR, 1993. Microsatellites and kinship. Trends Ecol Evol 8:285-288.
18. Roy MS, Geffen E, Smith D, Ostrander EA, and Wayne RK, 1994. Patterns of differentiation in North American wolf-like canids, as revealed by analysis of microsatellite loci. Mol Biol Evol 11:553-570.
19. Slatkin M, 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457-462.
20. Valdes AM, Slatkin M, and Freimer NB, 1993. Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise model revisited. Genetics 133:737-749.
21. Zajc I, 1996. Repetitive DNA sequences in different breeds of domestic dogs (PhD dissertation). Ljubljana, Slovenia: University of Ljubljana
22. Zajc I, Mellersh CS, Kelly EP, and Sampson J, 1994. A new method of paternity testing for dogs, based on microsatellite sequences. Vet Rec 135:545-547.
23. Zajc I, Mellersh CS, and Sampson J, 1997. Variability of microsatellites within and between different dog breeds. Mamm Genome 8:182-185.