Cerebral perfusion: Dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging. Part I: Principle and theory;Perfusion cérébrale: IRM dynamique de contraste de susceptibilité magnétique. Partie I: Principe et théorie

Medecine Nucleaire

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 547-556

  De Marco, G ^a   Idy Peretti, I ^b   Tropres I ^c   Franconi, J M ^d   Henry Feugeas, M C ^e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

^b HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

^c HÔPITAL MICHALLON   (France)

^d CNRS University Bordeaux Segalen   (France)

^e BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Bolus tracking MR imaging; Cerebral perfusion; Dynamic susceptibility contrast; MR contrast agent; MRI

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT;

BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN METABOLISM; BRAIN MICROCIRCULATION; BRAIN PERFUSION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; REVIEW;

EID: 0348042105     PISSN: 09281258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Sorensen A.G., Tievsky A.L., Ostergaard L., Weisskoff R.M., Rosen B.R. Contrast agents in functional MR Imaging. JMRI 1997; 7: 47-55.
2. Ostergaard L., Weisskoff R.M., Chesler D.A., Gyldensted C., Rosen B.R. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: mathematical approach and statistical analysis. MRM 1996; 36: 715-725.
3. Askienay S., Syrota A. Neurologie. In: Najean, eds médecine nucléaire 1990; Paris: ellipses: 259-300.
4. Rosen B.R., Belliveau J.W., Vevea J.M., Brady T.J. Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents. Magnetic résonnance in medicine 1990; 14: 249-265.
5. Weisskoff R.M., Kahne S. MRI susceptometry: image-based measurement of absolute susceptibility of MR contrast agents and human blood. Magnetic résonnance in medicine 1992; 24: 375-383.
6. de Marco G., Hindré F., Le Jeune J.J., Pouliquen D., Denizot B., Jallet P. Mise au point de nanoparticules de magnétite-dextran destinées à la lymphoscintigraphie par voie intraveineuse. Médecine nucléaire - Imagerie fonctionnelle et métabolique 1996; 20: 6-16.
7. de Marco G., Bogdanov A., Marecos E., Moore A., Simonova M., Weissleder R. MR Imaging of gene delivery to the central nervous system with an artificial vector. Radiology 1998; 208: 65-71.
8. Rozenman Y., Zou X., Kantor H.L. Cardiovascular MR imaging with iron oxide particles: utility of a superparamagnetic contrast agent and the role of diffusion in signal loss. Radiology 1990; 175: 655-659.
9. Rozenman Y., Zou X., Kantor H.L. Signal loss induced by superparamagnetic iron oxide particles in NMR spinecho images; the role of diffusion. Magnetic résonnance in medicine 1990; 14: 31-39.
10. Dormann. Le phénomène de superparamagnétisme. Revus Phys Appl 1981; 16: 2756301.
11. Roch A., Bach-Gansmo T., Muller R. In vitro relaxometric characterization of superparamagnetic contrast agents. MAGMA 1993; 1: 83-88.
12. Hardy P.A., Henkelman R.M. Transverse relaxation rate enhancement caused by magnetic particulates. Magnetic résonnance in medicine 1989; 7: 265-275.
13. Hendrick R.E., Haacke E.M. Basic Physics of MR Contrast Agents and Maximization of Images Contrast. JMRI 1993; 3: 137-148.
14. Kennan R.P., Zhong J., Gore J.C. On the relative importance of paramagnetic relaxation and diffusion-mediated susceptibility losses in tissues. Magnetic résonnance in medicine 1991; 22: 197-203.
15. Fossheim S., Johansson C., Fahlvik A.K., Grace D., Klaveness J. Lanthanide-Based Susceptibility Contrast Agents: Assessment of the Magnetic Properties. MRM 1996; 35: 201-206.
16. Griebel J., Mayr N.A., de Vries A., Knopp M.V., Gneiting T., Kremser C., Essig M., Hawighors H., Lukas P.H., Yuh W.T.C. Assessment of fumor microcirculation: a new role of dynamic contrast MR imaging. JMRI 1997; 7: 111-119.
17. Mayr N.A., Hawighorst H., Yuh W.T.C., Essig M., Magnotta V.A., Knopp M.V. MR microcirculation assessment in cervical cancer: correlations with histomorphological tumor markers and clinical outcome. Journal of Magnetic Resonance imaging 1999; 10: 267-276.
18. Brix G., Semmler W., Port R. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd DTPA enhanced MR Imaging. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1991; 15: 621-627.
19. Lauffer. Paramagnetic Metal Complexes as water Proton Relaxation Agents for NMR Imaging: Theory and Design. Chem Rev 1987; 87: 901-927.
20. Boxerman J.L., Bandettini P.A., Kwong K.K., Baker J.R., Davis T.L., Rosen B.R., Weisskoff R.M. The intravascular contribution to fMRI signal change: Monte-Carlo modeling and diffusion-weighted studies in vivo. MRM 1995; 34: 4-10.
21. Boxerman J.L., Hamberg L.M., Rosen B.R., Weisskoff R.M. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. MRM 1995; 34: 555-566.
22. Majumdar S., Gore J.C. Studies of diffusion in Random Fields Produced by Variations in Suceptibility. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 1988; 78: 41-55.
23. Troprès I., Grimault S., Vaeth A., Grillon E., Julien C., Payen J.F., Lamalle L., Décorps M. Vessel size imaging. Magnetic résonnance in medicine 2001; 45: 397-408.
24. Moseley M.E., Butts K. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Diffusion and Perfusion. In: D.D. Stark, W.G. Bradley Jr, eds MOSBY, Inc. 1999; Volume 3: 1515-1536.
25. Gillis P., Koenig S.H. Transverse relaxation of solvent protons induced by magnetized spheres: application to ferritin, erythrocytes and magnetite. Magnetic résonnance in medicine 1987; 5: 323-345.
26. Fisel C.R., Aekerman J.L., Buxton R.B., Garrido L., Belliveau K.W., Rosen B.R., Brady T.J. MR contrast due to microscopically heterogeneous magnetic susceptibility: numerical simulations and applications to cerebral physiology. Magnetic résonnance in medecine 1991; 17: 336-347.
27. Kennan R.P., Zhong J., Gore J.C. Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues. MRM 1994; 31: 9-21.
28. Weisskoff R.M., Zuo C.S., Boxerman J.L., Rosen B.R. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. MRM 1994; 31: 601-610.
29. Hardy P., Henkelman R.M. On the transverse relaxation rate enhancement induced by diffusion of spins through inhomogeneous fields. Magnetic resonance in medicine 1991; 17: 348-356.