Geschlechtsunterschiede in Partnerwahlpräferenzen: Ein Beitrag zur Diskussion zwischen Evolutionspsychologie und Sozioökonomie

Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 95-106

  Luszyk, Dagmar ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evolutionary psychology; Gender differences; Human mate choice; Role theory; Socioeconomic status

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347602841     PISSN: 00443514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024//0044-3514.32.2.95     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allgeier, E. R. & Wiederman, M. W. (1994). How useful is evolutionary psychology for understanding contemporary human sexual behavior? Annual Review of Sex Research, 5, 218-256.
2. Bereczkei, T. & Csanaky, A. (1996). Mate choice, marital success, and reproduction in a modern society. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 17-35.
3. Borkenau, P. (1993). Reicher Mann und schöne Frau? Zwei Studien zu Geschlechtsunterschieden in der Partnerpräferenz. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 24, 289-297.
4. Bortz, J. (1993). Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler (4. Neubearbeitete Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer.
5. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
6. Buss, D. M. (1994). The strategies of human mating. American Scientist, 82, 238-249.
7. Buss, D. M. & Angleitner, A. (1989). Mate selection preferences in Germany and the United States. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1269-1280.
8. Buss, D. M. et al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-47.
9. Buss, D. M. & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
10. Christensen, H. T. (1947). Student views on mate selection. Marriage and Family Living, 9, 85-88.
11. De Raad, B. & Doddema-Winsemius, M. (1992). Factors in the assortment of human mates: Differential preferences in Germany and the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 103-114.
12. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Eagly, A. H. & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior. Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
14. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981-993.
16. Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125-139.
17. Friebel, H. (1991). Die Gewalt, die Männer macht. Leseund Handbuch zur Geschlechterfrage. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
18. Haviland, W. A. (1993). Cultural anthropology (7th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
19. Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554-558.
20. Jones, S., Martin, R. & Pilbeam, D. (Eds.) (1992). The Cambridge encyclopedia of human evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kasser, T. & Sharma, Y. S. (1999). Reproductive freedom, educational equality, and females' preference for resource-acquisition characteristics in mates. Psychological Science, 10, 374-377.
22. Leacock, E. B. (1981). Women's status in egalitarian society. Implications for social evolution. In E. B. Leacock, Myth of male dominance: Collected articles on women cross-culturally (pp. 133-182). New York: Monthly Review Press.
23. Lee, R. B. (1968). What hunters do for a living, or how to make out on scarce resources. In R. B. Lee & I. DeVore (Eds.), Man the hunter (pp. 30-48). Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
24. Pérusse, D. (1994). Mate choice in modern societies. Testing evolutionary hypotheses with behavioral data. Human Nature, 5, 255-278.
25. Scheib, J. E., Kristiansen, A. & Wara, A. (1997). A Norwegian note on «sperm donor selection and the psychology of female mate choice». Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 143-149.
26. Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q. & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074-1080.
27. Townsend, J. M. (1989). Mate selection criteria. A pilot study. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 241-253.
28. Vivelo, F. R. (1995). Handbuch der Kulturanthropologie (2., veränderte Auflage). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
29. Walter, A. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of mate selection in Morocco. Human Nature, 8, 113-137.
30. Wiederman, M. W. (1993). Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 331-352.
31. Wiederman, M. W. & Allgeier, E. R. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 115-124.