Reproductive freedom, educational equality, and females' preference for resource-acquisition characteristics in mates

Psychological Science

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 374-377

  Kasser, Tim ^a   Sharma, Yadika S ^b  

^a KNOX COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347359101     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00171     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, 909-917.
2. Buss, D.M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
3. Buss, D.M. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanksi (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 3-38). New York: Guilford Press.
4. Buss, D.M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
5. Buss, D.M., et al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-41.
6. Buss, D.M., & Schmitt, D.P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
7. Caporael, L.R. (1989). Mechanisms matter: The difference between sociobiology and evolutionary psychology [Commentary on Buss, 1989]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 17-18.
8. Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
9. Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125-139.
10. Hrdy, S.B. (1997). Raising Darwin's consciousness: Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Human Nature: An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 8(1), 1-49.
11. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R.M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410-422.
12. Miller, L.C., & Fishkin, S.A. (1997). On the dynamics of human bonding and reproductive success: Seeking windows on the adapted-for-human-environmental interface. In J.A. Simpson & D.T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 197-236). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
14. Smuts, B. (1995). The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 6, 1-32.
15. Townsend, J.M. (1989). Mate selection criteria: A pilot study. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 241-253.
16. Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine.
17. United Nations. (1991). The world's women 1970-1990: Trends and statistics. New York: Author.
18. United Nations. (1995). The world's women 1995: Trends and statistics. New York: Author.
19. United Nations Development Programme. (1990). Human development report 1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Wiederman, M.W., & Allgeier, E.R. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 115-124.