Subcritical Crack Growth Behavior of AI2O3-Glass Dental Composites

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 233-238

  Zhu, Qingshan ^a,b   De With, Gijsbertus ^b   Dortmans, Leonardus J M G ^c   Feenstra, Frits ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF PROCESS ENGINEERING   (China)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alumina glass composite; Dental ceramics; Dynamic fatigue; Mechanical properties; Subcritical crack growth

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; CHEMICAL ATTACK; CRACK PROPAGATION; DENTAL COMPOSITES; DYNAMIC LOADS; GLASS; INFILTRATION; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); STRESS CORROSION CRACKING;

SUBCRITICAL CRACK GROWTH (SCG);

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; GLASS; WATER;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CORROSION; DYNAMIC FATIGUE; FATIGUE; MECHANICAL PROPERTY; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANICS; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; SUBCRITICAL CRACK GROWTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0347506027     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.10007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kelly JR. Ceramics in restorative and prosthetic dentistry. Annu Rev Mater Sci 1997;27:443-468.
2. Rekow ED, Thompson P. Clinical performance - A reflection of damage accumulation in ceramic dental crowns. Key Eng Mater 2001;198-199:115-134.
3. Holand W, Schweiger M, Frank M, Rheinberger V. A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress® 2 and the IPS Empress® glass ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:297-303.
4. Zeng K, Oden A, Rowcliffe D. Flexure tests on dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:434-439.
5. Seghi R, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:239-246.
6. Wolf WD, Vaidya KJ, Francis LF. Mechanical properties and failure analysis of alumina-glass dental composites. J Am Ceram Soc 1996;79:1769-1776.
7. Hornberger H, Marquis PM, Christiansen S, Strunk HP. Microstructure of a high strength alumina glass composite. J Mater Res 1996;11:855-858.
8. Wagner WC, Chu TM. Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:140-144.
9. Giordano R. Dental ceramic restorative systems. Compendium 1996;17:779-794.
10. Hegenbarth E. Procera aluminum oxide ceramics: A new way to achieve stability, precision, and esthetics in all-ceramic restorations. Quintessence Dent Technol 1996;20:21-34.
11. Andersson M, Oden A. A new all-ceramic crown: A dense sintered, high-purity alumina coping with porcelain. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:59-64.
12. Mclaren E, White SN. Survival of In-Ceram crowns in a private practice: A prospective clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:216-222.
13. Walton TR. A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: Clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metal-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:519-526.
14. Wiederhorn SM. Subcritical crack growth in ceramics. In: Bradt RC, Hasselman DPH, Lange FF, editors. Fracture mechanics of ceramics. New York: Plenum; 1974. vol 2, pp 613-646.
15. Fett T, Munz D. Evaluation of subcritical crack extension under constant loading. J Eur Ceram Soc 1990;6:67-72.
16. Morena R, Beaudreau GM, Lockwood PE, Evans AL, Fairhurst CW. Fatigue of dental ceramics in a simulated oral environment. J Dent Res 1986;65:993-997.
17. Myers ML, Ergle JW, Fairhurs CW, Ringle RD. Fatigue failure parameters of IPS-Empress porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:549-553.
18. Myers ML, Ergle JW, Fairhurst CW, Ringle RD. Fatigue characteristics of high-strength porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:253-257.
19. Sobrinho LC, Glover RH, Knowles JC, Cattell MJ. Comparison of the wet and dry fatigue properties of all ceramic crowns. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998;9:517-521.
20. Jung YG, Peterson IM, Kim DK, Lawn BR. Lifetime-limiting strength degradation from contact fatigue in dental ceramics. J Dent Res 2000;79:722-731.
21. Tyszblat M. Process for the preparation of a dental prosthesis by slight solid phase fritting of a metal oxide based infrastructure. U.S. Patent No. 4 772 436, 1988.
22. Chantikul P, Anstis GR, Lawn BR, Marshall DB. A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness: II, strength method. J Am Ceram Soc 1981;64:539-543.
23. Zhu Q, de With G, Dortmans LJMG, Feenstra F. Mechanical properties of alumina-glass dental composites. Key Eng Mater 2002;206-213:1603-1606.
24. Fuller ER, Lawn BR, Cook RF. Theory of fatigue for brittle flaws originating from residual stress concentrations. J Am Ceram Soc 1983;66:314-321.
25. Lawn BR, Marshall DB, Anstis GR, Dabbs TP. Fatigue analysis of brittle materials using indentation flaws. J Mater Sci 1981;16:2846-2854.
26. Zeng K, Breder K, Rowcliffe D. Comparison of slow crack growth behavior in alumina and SiC-whisker-reinforced alumina. J Am Ceram Soc 1993;76:1673-1680.
27. Ebrahimi ME, Chevalier J, Fantozzi G. Slow crack-growth behavior of alumina ceramics. J Mater Res 2000;15:142-147.
28. Barinov SM, Ivanov NV, Orlov SV, Shevchenko VJ. Influence of environment on delayed failure of alumina ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 1998;18:2057-2063.
29. 2. J Am Ceram Soc 1981;64:563-566.
30. 3. J Am Ceram Soc 1980;63:169-174.