Clinical performance - A reflection of damage accumulation in ceramic dental crowns

Key Engineering Materials

Volumn , Issue 198-199, 2001, Pages 115-134

  Rekow, E Dianne ^a   Thompson, Van P ^a  

^a RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ceramics; Damage; Dental Prostheses; Fatigue; Shaping

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; CERAMIC MATERIALS; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; MICROSTRUCTURE; ZIRCONIA;

CERAMIC DENTAL CROWNS; DAMAGE ACCUMULATION; ESTHETIC MATERIALS;

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

EID: 0035035485     PISSN: 10139826     EISSN: 16629795     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. DeLong, R. and W.H. Douglas, Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res,62(1) (1983), pp. 32-6.
2. Estafan, D., et al., A new approach to restorative dentistry: fabricating ceramic restorations using CEREC CAD/CAM. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 20(6), (1999), pp. 555-60.
3. Masek, R.T., Cutting time and expenses with the Cerec 2 CAD/CIM System. Dent Today, 18(4), (1999) pp. 64-7.
4. Cornish, G., Single appointment ceramics. A look at the CEREC II system. J Colo Dent Assoc, 77(2), (1998), pp. 12-4.
5. May, K.B., et al., Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent, 80(4), (1998), pp. 394-404.
6. Neiva, G., et al., Resistance to fracture of three all-ceramic systems. J Esthet Dent, 10(2) (1998), pp. 60-6.
7. Andersson, M., et al., Procera: a new way to achieve an all-ceramic crown. Quintessence Int, 29(5), (1998), pp. 285-96.
8. Razzoog, M.E., L.A. Lang, and K.S. McAndrew, AllCeram crowns for single replacement implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent, 78(5), (1997, pp. 486-9.
9. Russell, M.M., et al., A new computer-assisted method for fabrication of crowns and fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int,26(11), (1995), pp. 757-63.
10. Brunton, P.A., et al., Procera all-ceramic crowns: a new approach to an old problem? Br Dent J, 186(9), (1999), pp. 430-4.
11. Prestipino, V., A. Ingber, and J. Kravitz, Clinical and laboratory considerations in the use of a new all-ceramic restorative system. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent,10(5), (1998), pp. 567-75; quiz 576.
12. Zitzmann, N.U., C.P. Marinello, and H. Luthi, [The Procera Allceram all-ceramic system. The clinical and technical laboratory aspects in the use of a new all-ceramic system]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 109(8), (1999), pp. 820-34.
13. Edwards, M., P. Jacobsen, and G. Williams, The Three-Point Beam Test for Evaluation of Dental Porcelain. Journal of Dental Research, 62(10), (1983), pp. 1086-1088.
14. Hornberger, H. and P. Marquis, Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of In-Ceram - a Ceramic-Glass Composite for Dental Crowns. Glastec Ber Glass Sci Technology, 68(6), (1995), pp. 188-194.
15. Zeng, K., A. Oden, and D. Rowcliffe, Flexure tests on dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont, 9(5),(1996), pp. 434-9.
16. Grossman, D. Structure and Physical Properties of Dicor/MGC Glass-Ceramic. in International Symposium on Computer Restorations. (1991), Zurich, Switzerland: Quintessence.
17. Giordano, R., Dental Ceramic Restorative Systems. Compendium, 17(8), (1996), pp. 779-794.
18. Höland, W., M. Schweiger, M. Frank, V. Rheinberger, A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress® 2 and the IPS Empress®Glass-Ceramics, J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater), 53, (2000), pp. 297-303.
19. Magne, P. and U. Belser, Estshetic Improvements and In-Vitro Testing on In-Ceram Alumina and Spinell Ceramic. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 10(5), (1997), pp. 459-466.
20. Seghi, R. and J. Sorensen, Relative Flexural Strength of Six New Ceramic Materials. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 8,(1995), pp. 239-246.
21. Kumin, P., H. Luthy, and W.H. Mormann, [The strength of ceramic and polymer after CAD/CIM treatment and in a bond with dentin]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 103(10), (1993), pp. 1261-8.
22. Bieniek, K. W. and R. Marx, [The mechanical loading capacity of new all-ceramic crown and bridge materials]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 104(3), (1994), pp. 284-9.
23. Hegenbarth, E., Procera aluminum oxide ceramics: a new way to acheive stability, precision, and esthetics in all-ceramic restorations. Quintessence Dental Technology, 20(1996), pp. 21-34.
24. Wagner, W.C. and T.M. Chu, Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent, 76(2), (1996), pp. 140-4.
25. Cales, B. Colored Zirconia for Dental Applications, in Bioceramics 11. (1998), New York, NY.
26. Lehner, C. and P. Scharer, All Ceramic Crowns. Current Opinions in Dentistry: Current Science - Prosthodontics and Endodontics, (1992), pp. 45-52.
27. Quinn, J., Materials Properties of Ceramics for Dental Applications", in Material Science. 2000, University of Maryland: College Park, MD.
28. Zhang, G., Assessment of Machining Performance of Dental Ceramics. Transactions of the North American Manufacturing Research Institute of ASME, XXVI, (1998), pp. 105-110.
29. Luthy, H., et al., Effects of veneering and glazing on the strength of heat-pressed ceramics. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 103(10), (1993), pp. 1257-60.
30. Dong, J.K., et al., Heat-pressed ceramics: technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont, 5(1), (1992), pp. 9-16.
31. Drummond, J.L., et al., Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics. Dent Mater,16(3), (2000), pp. 226-233.
32. Peterson, I.M., et al., Mechanical characterization of dental ceramics by hertzian contacts. J Dent Res, 77(4), (1998), pp. 589-602.
33. Gibbs, C.H., et al., Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent, 46(4), (1981), pp. 443-9.
34. Bochard, R., H. Erpenstein, and T. Kerschbaum, Langzeitergebnisse von glavanokeramicschen und glaskeramischen (Dicor®) Einzelkronen unter klinischen Bedingungen. Dtsch Zahrnärztl Z, 53, (1998), pp. 616-619.
35. Kelsey, W.P., 3rd, et al., 4-year clinical study of castable ceramic crowns. Am J Dent, 8(5), (1995), pp. 259-62.
36. Sjogren, G., R. Lantto, and A. Tillberg, Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns (Dicor) in general practice. J Prosthet Dent, 81(3), (1999), pp. 277-84.
37. Malament, K.A. and S.S. Socransky, Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years. Part II: Effect of thickness of Dicor material and design of tooth preparation. J Prosthet Dent, 81(6), (1999), p p. 662-667.
38. Malament, K.A. and S.S. Socransky, Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years: Part I. Survival of Dicor complete coverage restorations and effect of internal surface acid etching, tooth position, gender, and age. J Prosthet Dent, 81(1), (1999), pp. 23-32.
39. Hankinson, J.A. and E.G. Cappetta, Five years clinical experiences with a leucite-reinforced porcelain crown system. Intern J of Periodon and Restor Dent, 14, (1994), pp. 138-143.
40. Fradeani, M. and A. Aquilano, Clinical experience with Empress crowns. Int J Prosthodont, . 10(3), (1997), pp. 241-7.
41. Sorensen, J.A., et al., IPS Empress crown system: three-year clinical trial results. J Calif Dent Assoc,. 26(2), (1998), pp. 130-6.
42. Sjogren, G., et al., Clinical examination of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns (Empress) in general practice: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont, 12(2), (1999), pp. 122-8.
43. McLaren, E. and W. SN, Survival of In-Ceram Crowns in a Private Practice: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 83(2), (2000), pp. 216-222.
44. Probster, L., Four year clinical study of glass-infiltrated, sintered alumina crowns. J Oral Rehabil, 23(3), (1996), pp. 147-51.
45. Malament, K. and V. Thompson. Weibull Analysis of a Clinical Data Base of Molar Ceramic Crowns. in International Symposium on Advanced Materials with Biomedical Applications, NIST. (1999).
46. Walton, T.R., A 10-year longitudinal study affixed prosthodontics: clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metal-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont, 12(6), (1999), pp. 519-26.
47. Smales, R. and W. Hawthorne, Long-Term Survival of Extensive Amalgams and Posterior Crowns. Journal of Dentistry, 25(3-4), (1997), pp. 225-227.
48. Felden, A., et al., Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig, 2(4), (1998), pp. 161-7.
49. McLean, J. The Future of Dental Porcelain, in First International Symposium on Ceramics. Quintessence Publishing Co, Chicago, IL, (1983).
50. Le, D., et al., Microstructural Effects on the Machining Performance of Dental Ceramics. ASME Manufacturing Science and Technology, MED 6-1, (1997), pp. 245-251.
51. Rekow, E. Relation of Microstructure and Milling Conditions in Glass Ceramics for Dental Restorations, in 9th CIMTEC International Conference on Modern Materials and Technologies. Florence, Italy, (1998), pp. 301-309.
52. Wilson, O.C. Jr., et al., Environmental Effects of Material Removal and Damage in Dental Ceramics. Journal of Dental Research, 76(Abstract 3091), (1997).
53. Qi, L., Machining of Dental Ceramics with Applications on CAD/CAM Dental Resotrations, in Mechanical Engineering. University of Maryland: College Park, MD, (2000).
54. Xu, H. and S. Jahanmir, Effect of Microstructure on Damage Tolerance in Grinding Micaceous Glass-Ceramics. Journal of Materials Research, 13, (1998), pp. 2231-2236.
55. Jung, Y.G., et al., Damage modes in dental layer structures. J Dent Res, 78(4), (1999), pp. 887-97.
56. Jung, Y.G., et al., Contact damage resistance and strength degradation of glass-infiltrated alumina and spinel ceramics. J Dent Res, 78(3) (1999), pp. 804-14.
57. Jung, Y.G., et al., Lifetime-limiting strength degradation from contact fatigue in dental ceramics. J Dent Res, 79(2), (2000), pp. 722-31.
58. Peterson, I.M., et al., Role of microstructure on contact damage and strength degradation of micaceous glass-ceramics. Dent Mater, 14(1), (1998), pp. 80-9.
59. Kappert, H. and H. Knode, InCeram: Testing A New Ceramic Material. Quintessence Dental Technology, (1993), pp. 87-97.
60. Lawn, B., et al., Making ceramics "ductile". Science, 263, (1994), pp. 1114-1116.
61. White, S., et al., Cyclic Mechaical Fatigue of a Feldspathic Dental Porcelain. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 8, (1995), pp. 413-420.
62. Guiberteau, F., et al., Indentation Fatigue: A Simple Cyclic Hertzian Test for Measuring Damage Accumulation in Poycrystalline Cermics. Philosophical Magainze A, 68, (1993), pp. 1003-1016.
63. Lawn, B., et al., A Model of Strength Degradation from Hertzian Contact Damage in Tough Ceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 81, (1998), pp. 1509-1520.
64. Pajares, A., F. Guiberteau, and B. Lawn, Hertzian Contact Damage in Magnesia-Partially-Stabilized Zirconia. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 78(4), (1995), pp. 1083-1086.
65. Pature, N. and B. Lawn, Fatigue in Ceramics with INterconnecting Weak Interface: A Study Using Cyclic Hertzian Contacts. Acta Metall Mat, 43(4), (1995), pp. 1609-1617.
66. Sobrinho, L.C., et al., Investigation of the dry and wet fatigue properties of three all- ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont, 11(3), (1998), pp. 255-62.
67. Chen, H.Y., et al., Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM and pressed-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent, 82(4), (1999), pp. 468-75.
68. Clegg, W., et al., A Simple Way to Make Tough Ceramics. Nature, 347(10), (1990), pp. 455-457.
69. Marshall, D., J. Ratto, and F. Lange, Enhanced Fracture Toughness in Layered Microcomposites of Ce-ZrO2 and AL2O3. Journal of the :American Ceramics Society, 74(2), (1991), pp. 2979-2987.
70. Marshall, D., Deisgn of High-Toughness Laminar Zirconia Composites. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, 71(6), (1992), pp. 969-973.
71. Folsom, C., F. Zok, and F. Lange, Flexural Properties of Brittle Multilayer Materials: I. Modeling. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 77(3), (1994), pp. 689-696.
72. Fosom, C., F. Zok, and F. Lange, Flexural Properties of Brittle Multilayer Materials: II. Experiments. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 77(8), (1994), pp. 2081-2087.
73. Liu, H., B. Lawn, and S. Hsu, Hertzian Contact Response of Tailored SiliconNitride Multilayers. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 79(4), (1996), pp. 1009-1014.
74. Liu, H. and S. Hsu, Fracture Behavior of Multilayer Silicon Nitride/Boron Nitride Ceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 79(9), (1996), pp. 2452-2457.
75. Chai, H., b. Lawn, and s. Wuttiphan, Fracture Modes in Brittle Coatings with Large Interlayer Modulus Mismatch. Journal of Materials Research, 14(9), (1999), pp. 1-13.
76. Craig, R., Restorative Dental Materials. St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby. (1998).
77. Spears, I.R., et al., The effects of enamel anisotropy on the distribution of stress in a tooth. J Dent Res, 72(11), (1993), pp. 1526-31.
78. Gilmore, R.S., R.P. Pollack, and J.L. Katz, Elastic properties of bovine dentine and enamel. Arch Oral Biol,15(8), (1970), pp. 787-96.
79. Xu, H.H., et al., Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res, 77(3), (1998), pp. 472-80.
80. Lin, C.P. and W.H. Douglas, Structure-property relations and crack resistance at the bovine dentin- enamel junction. J Dent Res, 73(5), (1994), pp. 1072-8.
81. Rasmussen, S.T., et al., Fracture properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res,. 55(1), (1976), pp. 154-64.
82. Rasmussen, S.T., Fracture properties of human teeth in proximity to the dentinoenamel junction. J Dent Res, 63(11), (1984), pp. 1279-83.
83. Rasmussen, S.T. and R.E. Patchin, Fracture properties of human enamel and dentin in an aqueous environment. J Dent Res, 63(12), (1984), pp. 1362-8.
84. Hayashi, K. and H. Kiba, Microhardness of enamel and dentine of cat premolar teeth. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi, 51(5), (1989), pp. 1033-5.
85. Meredith, N., et al., Measurement of the microhardness and Young's modulus of human enamel and dentine using an indentation technique. Arch Oral Biol, 41(6), (1996), pp. 539-45.
86. Kinney, J.H., et al., Hardness and Young's modulus of human peritubular and intertubular dentine. Arch Oral Biol, 41(1), (1996), pp. 9-13.
87. Balooch, M., et al., Dental hard tissue interfaces: optical emission spectroscopy. J Dent Res, 79(Spec Issue) (2000), pp. 302, Abst No. 1275.
88. Marshall, G.W., M. Balooch, and S.J. Marshall. Dentin-enamel junction: AFM nanohardness and modulus, in Transactions of the Sixth World Biomaterial Congress. Kamuela, Hawaii: ARDEL Associates, (2000).
89. Kelly, J., Clinically Relevant Approach to Failure Testing of All-Ceramic Restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 81(6), (1999), pp. 652-661.
90. Kelly, J., S. Campbel, and H. Bowen, Fracture-Surface Analysis of Dental Ceramics. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 62, (1989), pp. 536-541.
91. Kelly, J., et al., Fracture Surface Analysis of Dental Ceramics: Clinically Failed Restorations. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 3, (1990), pp. 430-440.
92. Thompson, J., et al., Fracture Surface Characterization of Clinically Failed all-Ceramic Crowns. Journal of Dental Research, 73, (1994), pp. 1824-1832.
93. Baharav, H., et al., Effect of Glaze THickness on the Fracture Toughness and Hardness of Alumina-Reinforced Porcelain. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 81(5), (1999), pp. 515-519.
94. Anusavice, K.J. and B. Hojjatie, Tensile stress in glass-ceramic crowns: effect of flaws and cement voids. Int J Prosthodont,. 5(4), (1992), pp. 351-8.
95. Hojjatie, B. and K.J. Anusavice, Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glass-ceramic dental crowns. J Biomech, 23(11), (1990), pp. 1157-66.