Within factors involved in the vertical signalling perception: Holistic processing vs. analytical;Factores intrasujeto implicados en la percepción de la señalización vertical: Procesamiento holístico y analítico

Psicothema

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 141-146

  Luna Blanco, Rafaela ^a   Ruiz Soler, Marcos ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347120883     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Amirkhiabani, G. (1998). Relative size of global visual stimulus: advantage and interference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 1427-1441.
2. Amirkhiabani, G. y Lovegrove, W.J. (1996). Processing dominance of global and local information in visual patterns. Acta Psychologica, 73, 131-143.
3. Amirkhiabani, G. y Lovegrove, W.J. (1997). Perceptual organization and the global-local relationship. Psychologia, 40, 41-50.
4. Arnau, J., Salvador, F., y Blanca, M.J. (1992). Efecto de la dimension estimular en el procesamiento global-local. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 45, 13-21.
5. Blanca, M.J., López, D., Luna, R., Zalabardo, C. y Rando, B. (2000). Similitud entre el «target» y nivel no relevante en el procesamiento global y local de estímulos visuales jerárquicos. Psicothema, 12, 77-80.
6. Boselie, F. (1994). Local and global factors in visual occlusion. Perception, 23, 517-528.
7. D.G.T. (1996). 10 Años de Investigación para la Educación Vial. Dirección General de Tráfico. Ministerio de Justicia e Interior. Madrid.
8. Greany, J. y MacRae, A.W. (1992). The order of visual processing: top-down, bottom-up, middle-out, or none of these?. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 30, 255-257.
9. Grice, R. G., Canham, L., y Boroughs, J. (1983). Forest before trees?. It depends where you look. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 121-128.
10. Han, S., Humphreys, G.W. y Chen, L. (1999). Parallel and competitive processes in hierarchical analysis: Perceptual grouping and encoding of closure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1411-1432.
11. Hoffman, J.E. (1980). Interaction between global and local levels of form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 222-234.
12. Hoffman, J. y Kunde, W. (1999). Location specific target expectancies in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1127-1141.
13. Kimchi, R. (1983). Perceptual organization of visual patterns. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1982. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44.
14. Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.
15. Kimchi, R. (1994). The role of wholistic/configural properties versus global properties in visual form perception. Perception, 23, 489-504.
16. Kimchi, R. (1998). Selective attention to global and local levels in the comparison of hierarchical patterns. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 189-198.
17. Kimchi, R. y Block, B. (1998). Dominance of configurai properties in visual form perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 135-139.
18. Kimchi, R. y Palmer, S.E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 521-535.
19. Kimchi, R. y Palmer, S. E.(1985). Separability and integrality of global and local levels of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 11, 673-687.
20. Kinchla, R.A. (1974). Detecting target elements in multielement arrays: A confusability model. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 149-158.
21. Kinchla, R.A. (1977). The role of structural redundancy in the perception of visual target. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 19-30.
22. Kinchla, R.A. y Wolfe, J.M. (1979). The order of visual processing: «Top-down», «bottom-up» or «middle-out». Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 225-231.
23. Lamb, M.R. y Robertson, L.C. (1989). Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global and local level information? Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 254-258.
24. Lovegrove, W.J., Lehmkuhle, S., Baro, J.A. y Garzia, R. (1991). The effect of uniform field flicker and blurring on the global precedence effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 289-291.
25. Luna, R. (1993). Estilo cognitivo y diferenciación hemisférica: nivel de procesamiento. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 46, 15-21.
26. Luna, R. (2000). El modelo múltiple de regresión logística en la percepción de figuras geométricas. Psicothema, 12, 348-351.
27. Luna, D. y Marcos-Ruiz, R. (1995). Selective attention to global and local information: Effects of visual angle, exposure duration, and eccentricity on processing dominance. Visual Cognition, 2, 183-200.
28. Luna, D., Marcos-Ruiz, R. y Merino, J. (1995). Selective attention of global and local information: Effects of visual angle, exposure duration, and eccentricity on processing dominace. Visual Cognition, 2, 183-200.
29. Luna, D. y Merino, J. (1998). Efectos de la reducción parcial del sesgo hacia el procesamiento del nivel local sobre la transición en el orden del procesamiento. Psicológica, 19, 259-274.
30. Luna, D., Merino, J. y Marcos-Ruiz, R. (1990). Processing dominance of global and local information in visual patterns. Acta Psychologica, 73, 131-143.
31. Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory and Cognition, 7, 476-484.
32. Merino, J. y Luna, D. (1997a). Influencia de la posición retiniana de la información global y local sobre la transición en el orden de procesamiento. Psicológica, 18, 119-138.
33. Merino, J. y Luna, D. (1997b). Procesos sensoriales y primacía del procesamiento de la información global y local. Cognitiva, 9, 159-173.
34. M.O.P.T. (1991). Borrador de Instrucción 8.1-IC/91 «Señalización Vertical». Secretaría General para las Infraestructuras del Transporte. Dirección General de Carreteras. Madrid.
35. Navon, D. (1977). Forest berofe trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
36. Navon, D. (1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research, 43, 1-32.
37. Navon, D. (1983). How many trees does it take to make a forest?. Perception, 12, 239-254.
38. Navon, D. (1991). Testing a queue hyphotesis for the processing of global and local information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 173-189.
39. Navon, D. y Norman, J. (1983). Does global precedence really depend on visual angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 955-965.
40. Nicoletti, R., Rumiati, R., Peressotti, F. y Job., R. (1993). Sulla precedenza del livello globale nella percezione e nell'elaborazione di stimoli visivi complesi. Ricerche di Psicologia, 17, 37-56.
41. Pasnak, R.T. y Tyer, Z. (1985). Distintive local features of visual patterns. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 113-115.
42. Pomerantz. J.R., y Pristach, E. A. (1990). Emergent feature, attention and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 635-649.
43. Robertson, L. y Lamb, M. (1991). Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 299-330.
44. Sekuler, A. (1994). Local and global minima in visual completion: effects of symmetry and orientation. Perception, 23, 529-545.
45. Ward, L.M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 562-581.