Similarity between target and irrelevant level in global and local processing of hierarchical stimuli;Similitud entre el «target» y nivel no relevante en el procesamiento global y local de estímulos visuales jerárquicos

Psicothema

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2000, Pages 77-80

  Blanca, M J ^a   Lopez D ^a   Luna, R ^a   Zalabardo, C ^a   Rando, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348004130     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Amirkhiabani, G. y Lovegrove, W. J. (1996): Processing Dominance of Global and Local Information in Visual Patterns. Acta Psychologica, 73, 131-143.
2. Arnau, J., Blanca, M.J. y Salvador, F. (1992): Diferenciación hemisférica, estilos cognitivos y procesamiento de la información visual. Psicothema, 4(1), 237-252.
3. Duncan, J. y Humphreys, G. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Pshychological Review, 96 (3), 433-458.
4. Duncan, J. y Humphreys, G. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18 (2) 578-588.
5. Grice, R. G., Canham, L. y Boroughs, J.(1983): Forest before trees?. It depends where you look. Perception & Psychophysics, 33 (2), 121-128.
6. Hoffman, J.E. (1980): Interaction between global and local levels of form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6(2), 222-234.
7. Kimchi, R., (1988): Selective attention to global and local levels in the comparison of hierarchical patterns. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 189.
8. Kinchla, R. A. (1974): Detecting target elements in multi-element arrays: A confusability model. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 149-158.
9. Lamb, M.R. y Robertson, L.C., (1989): Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global and local level information?. Perception & Psychophysics, 46(3), 254-258.
10. Luna, D., Marcos-Ruiz, R. y Merino, J. M. (1995): Selective attention of global and local information: Effects of visual angle, exposure duration, and eccentricity on processing dominance. Visual Cognition, 2 (2/3), 183-200.
11. Luna, D. y Merino, J.M. (1990). Processing dominance of global and local information in visual patterns. Acta Psychologica, 73(2), 131-143.
12. Martin, M. (1979): Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory & Cognition, 7(6), 476.
13. Navon, D. (1977): Forest before Trees: The Precedence of Global Feature in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
14. Navon, D. y Norman, J.(1983): Does global precedence really depend on visual angle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35, 955-965.
15. Treisman, A. y Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95 (1), 15-48.
16. Wolfe, J. y Friedman-Hill, R.S. (1992). On the role of symmetry in visual search. Psychological Science, 3(3), 194-198.