The influence of inversion on the judgment of facial and non-facial attributes

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 96, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 27-42

  Bäuml, Karl Heinz ^a   Schnelzer, Maria ^a   Zimmer, Alf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Face perception; Facial attributes; Inversion effect; Rotation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041762656     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00003-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bäuml, K.-H., 1992. Diskriminationslernen bei rotierten Gesichtern: Eine Markov-Analyse von Kodierungsund Assoziationsprozessen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 39, 1-17.
2. Bäuml, K.-H., 1994. Upright versus upside-down faces: How inter-face attractiveness varies with orientation. Perception & Psychophysics 56, 163-172.
3. Bäuml, K.-H., M. Schnelzer and A. Zimmer, 1997. Discrimination and association processes for faces and non-faces: The effect of rotation. Acta Psychologica 95 (in press).
4. Bruce, V., 1988. Recognising faces. London: Erlbaum.
5. Bruce, V. and A. Young, 1986. Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 77, 305-327.
6. Diamond, R. and S. Carey, 1986. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115, 107-117.
7. Farah, M.J., J.W. Tanaka and H.M. Drain, 1995. What causes the face inversion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 628-634.
8. Lindgren, B.W., 1976. Statistical theory (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
9. Mark, L.S., J.B. Pittenger, H. Hines, C. Carello, R.E. Shaw and J.T. Todd, 1980. Wrinkling and head shape as coordinated source of age-level information. Perception & Psychophysics 27, 117-124.
10. Perrett, D.I., J.K. Hietanen, M.W. Oram and P.J. Benson, 1992. Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 335, 23-30.
11. Pittenger, J.B. and R.E. Shaw, 1975. Ageing faces as viscal-elastic events: Implications for theory of nonrigid shape perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1, 374-382.
12. Rolls, E.T., 1992. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 335, 11-21.
13. Tanaka, J.W. and M.J. Farah, 1991. Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: Testing a theory of face perception. Perception & Psychophysics 50, 367-372.
14. Valentine, T., 1988. Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 79, 471-491.
15. Valentine, T. and V. Bruce, 1988. Mental rotation of faces. Memory & Cognition 16, 556-566.
16. Wells, G.L. and B. Hrywic, 1984. Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory & Cognition 12, 338-344.
17. Winograd, E., 1978. 'Encoding operations which facilitate memory across the life span'. In: M.M. Gruneberg, P.E. Morris and R.N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic Press.
18. Winograd, E., 1981. Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7, 181-190.
19. Yin, R., 1969. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 81, 141-145.