Accountability testing without accountability?

Interchange

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 191-202

  Lam, Tony C M ^a   Bordignon, Catherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346904874     PISSN: 08264805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1013022527681     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ainsworth, L. (2000, November). Test Pilots. Canadian Living. 171-174.
2. American Educational Research Association (2000, July). Position statement concerning high-stakes testing in Pre K-12 education. Available at AERA web site (http://www.aera.net).
3. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Casas, F.R. & Meaghan, D.E. (2001). Renewing the debate over the use of standardized testing in the evaluation of learning and teaching. Interchange, 32(2).
5. Froese-Germain, B. (2001). Standardized testing + high stakes decisions = educational inequity. Interchange, 32(2).
6. Haertel, E.H. (1999). Performance assessment and education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(9), 662-666.
7. Lam, C.M. & Bordignon, C. (2001). An examination of English teachers' opinions about the Ontario Grade 9 reading and writing test. Interchange, 32(2).
8. Linn, R.L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16.
9. Linn, R.L. (1993). Educational assessment: Expanded expectations and challenges. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 1-16.
10. McLaughlin, M.W. & Shepard, L.A. (1995). Improving education through standards-based reform: A report of the National Academy of Education panel on standards-based education reform. Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.
11. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23 (3), 13-23.
12. OECTA Report. (1977, Fall). Expert analysis of grade 3 assessment confirms teacher concerns. The Reporter, 37-38.
13. Popham, W.J. (1999). Where large scale educational assessment is heading and why it shouldn't. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(3), 13-17.
14. Shavelson, R.J., Baxter, G.P. & Pine, J. (May 1992). Performance assessments: Political rhetoric and measurement reality. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 22-27.
15. Taylor, C. (1994). Assessment for measurement or standards: The peril and promise of large-scale assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 231-262.
16. Shepard, L.A. (1989). Why we need better assessments. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 4-9.
17. Shepard, L.A. (1997). The centrality of test use and consequences for test validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 5-8.
18. Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
19. Whitford, B.L. & Jones, K. (2000). Kentucky lesson: How high stakes school accountability undermines a performance-based curriculum vision. In B.L. Whitford & K. Jones (Eds.), Accountability assessment, and teacher commitment: Lessons from Kentucky's reform efforts (pp. 9-24). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
20. Wiggins, G. (1989, April). Teaching to the (authentic) test. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41-47.