Seeing two as one: Linking Apparent Motion and Repetition Blindness

Psychological Science

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 74-79

  Chun, Marvin M ^a   Cavanagh, Patrick ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346789362     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00686.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anstis, S.M. (1980). The perception of apparent movement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 290, 153-168.
2. Armstrong, I.T., & Mewhort, D.J.K. (1995). Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: Encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1044-1052.
3. Bavelier, D., & Potter, M.C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 134-147.
4. Bjork, E.L., & Murray, J.T. (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review, 84, 472-484.
5. Cavanagh, P. (1996). Attention-based visual processes. Canadian Psychology, 37, 59.
6. Chun, M.M. (in press). Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
7. Downing, P., & Kanwisher, N. (1995). Types and tokens unscathed: A reply to Whittlesea, Dorken, and Podrouzek (1995) and Whittlesea and Podrouzek (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1698-1702.
8. Egeth, H.E., & Santee, J.L. (1981). Conceptual and perceptual components of interletter inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 506-517.
9. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1995). Repetition blindness: Perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 275-292.
10. Green, M. (1986). What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion? Vision Research, 26, 599-607.
11. Green, M. (1989). Color correspondence in apparent motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 15-20.
12. Hochhaus, L., & Johnston, J.C. (1996). Perceptual repetition blindness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 355-366.
13. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D.R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B.J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
15. Kanwisher, N. (1986). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
16. Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
17. Kanwisher, N. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 404-421.
18. Kanwisher, N., & Driver, J. (1992). Objects, attributes, and visual attention: Which, what, and where. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 26-31.
19. Kanwisher, N., Driver, J., & Machado, L. (1995). Spatial repetition blindness is modulated by selective attention to color or shape. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 303-337.
20. Kanwisher, N., & Potter, M.C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 30-47.
21. Kanwisher, N., & Yin, C. (1993). Repetition blindness for pictures: Evidence for rapid computation of abstract visual representations [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 34, 1131.
22. Luo, C.R., & Caramazza, A. (1996). Temporal and spatial repetition blindness: Effects of presentation mode and repetition lag on the perception of repeated items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 95-113.
23. Marohn, K.M., & Hochhaus, L. (1988). Different-case still leads to perceptual blindness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 29-31.
24. Mozer, M. (1989). Types and tokens in visual letter recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 287-303.
25. Navon, D. (1976). Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 130-138.
26. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Repetition blindness: Effects of timing, load and stimulus configuration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 500-519.
27. Pylyshyn, Z. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition, 32, 65-97.
28. Pylyshyn, Z.W., & Storm, R.W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197.
29. Ramachandran, V.S., & Anstis, S.M. (1986). The perception of apparent motion. Scientific American, 254, 102-109.
30. Ternus, J. (1938). The problem of phenomenal identity. In W.D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 149-160). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner. (Original work published 1926)
31. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
32. Trick, L.M., & Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80-102.
33. Wertheimer, M. (1961). Experimental studies on the seeing of motion. In T. Shipley (Ed. and Trans.), Classics in psychology (pp. 1032-1089). New York: Philosophical Library. (Original work published 1912)
34. Whittlesea, B.W.A., Dorken, M.D., & Podrouzek, K.W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists, Part I: Encoding and representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1670-1688.
35. Whittlesea, B.W.A., & Podrouzek, K.W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists, Part II: Remembering repetitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1689-1697.