Whose Gap? Whose Mind? Plural rationalities and disappearing academics

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 273-282

  Gough, Stephen ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346488266     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504620220145429     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. CONNELL, S., 1997. Empirical-analytical methodological research in environmental education: response to a negative trend in methodological and ideological discussions. Environmental Education Research, 3(2): 117–132.
2. DOUGLAS, M., and WILDAVSKY, A., 1982. Risk and Culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. GOUGH, S., 1995. Environmental education in a region of rapid economic development: the case of Sarawak. Environmental Education Research, 1(3): 327–336.
4. GOUGH, S., and REID, A., 2000. Environmental education research as profession, as science, as art and as craft: implications for guidelines in qualitative research. Environmental Education Research, 6(1): 47–57.
5. GOUGH, S., and SCOTT, W., 1999. Education and training for sustainable tourism: problems, possibilities and cautious first steps. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 4: 193–212.
6. GOUGH, S., and SCOTT, W., 2001. Curriculum development and sustainable development: practices, institutions and literacies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(2): 137–153.
7. GOUGH, S., SCOTT, W., and STABLES, S., 2000. Beyond O'Riordan: balancing anthropocentrism and ecocentrism. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 9(1): 36–47.
8. HOLLING, C.S., 1995. “ Sustainability: the cross-scale dimension ”. In Defining and Measuring Sustainability: the biogeophysical foundations, Edited by: MUNASINGHE, M., and SHEARER, W., 65–75. Washington, DC: United Nations University/World Bank.
9. JAMES, P., and THOMPSON, M., 1989. “ The plural rationality approach ”. In Environmental Threats: perception, analysis and management, Edited by: BROWN, J., 87–94. London: Belhaven Press.
10. KOULMUSS, A., and AGYEMAN, J., 2002. Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the harriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3): 239–260.
11. O'RIORDAN, T., 1989. “ The challenge for environmentalism ”. In New Models in Geography, Edited by: PEEI, R., and THRIFT, N., vol. 1, 77–102. London: Unwin Hyman.
12. REID, A., and GOUGH, S., 2000. Guidelines for reporting and evaluating qualitative research: what are the alternatives?. Environmental Education Research, 6(1): 59–91.
13. ROBOTTOM, I., 1987. Contestation and consensus in environmental education. Curriculum Perspectives, 7(1): 23–26.
14. SCHWARZ, M., and THOMPSON, M., 1990. Divided We Stand: redefining politics, technology and social choice, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
15. SHLEIFFER, A., and VISHNY, R.W., 1998. The Grabbing Hand: government pathologies and their cures, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. SIOBERG, L., 1997. Explaining risk perception: an empirical evaluation of cultural theory. Risk Decision and Policy, 2(2): 113–130.
17. THOMPSON, M., 1990. “ Policy making in the face of uncertainty ”. In Concepts of the Environment in the Social Sciences: Readings, Vol. 3, 161–187. London: University of London, Wye College.
18. THOMPSON, M., 1997. Security and solidarity: an anti-reductionist framework for thinking about the relationship between as and the rest of nature. The Geographical Journal, 163(2): 141–149.
19. WILDAVSKY, A., and DAKE, K., 1990. Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why?. Daedalus, 4(119): 41–60.